[ April 16, 2024 ]
So we are supposed to believe they could track down every grandma and patriotic American that took selfies in the Capitol but not the leaker.
They took no investigative steps that the FBI or an outside law enforcement agency could have taken.
With that said, evidence for this sort of thing (if it exists) could be outside the building, such as phone logs, messages on private accounts, etc. But unless I'm missing it, the only reference to out-of-building evidence collection was this: pic.twitter.com/qhV6imUwgb
— Orin Kerr (@OrinKerr) January 19, 2023
Story continues below advertisement
The Marshal apparently didn't do the kind of outside-the-building investigation the FBI could do, like issuing subpoenas/warrants to get internet/phone records or contents from private providers. They requested phone/text logs from private accounts only on a voluntary basis: pic.twitter.com/F9RBJY8QuE
— Orin Kerr (@OrinKerr) January 19, 2023
In this day and age with office technology, there is a trail. Printers are attached to servers. Desktops are attached to networks. Who printed out the Opinion? Scanned it? Copied it. Hands that touched it – check home computers and emails. The answer is there somewhere.
— Brandi 🇺🇸✝️ (@gramby2020) January 19, 2023
But they want us to believe they can’t identify the Supreme Court leaker
Quick reminder: this leak led to a failed assassination attempt of a Supreme Court judge. Washington Examiner: After nearly 11 months of an investigation into who leaked a draft decision signaling overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court announced Thursday its investigation is inconclusive. The court released a 20-page public copy of the investigation. Chief Justice John Roberts initially tapped the marshal of the Supreme Court to conduct the investigation (Washington Examiner). Spencer Brown: The Marshal’s report noted that “if a Court employee disclosed the draft opinion, that person brazenly violated a system that was built fundamentally on trust with limited safeguards to regulate and constrain access to very sensitive information,” and pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic as contributing to an “expansion of the ability to work from home, as well as gaps in the Court’s security policies” that “created an environment where it was too easy to remove sensitive information from the building and the Court’s IT networks” (Townhall). Life News: The House Judiciary Committee intends to continue investigating the Supreme Court draft opinion leak that surrounded Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Life News).
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
23 Comments
1 year ago
The House should investigate it.
1 year ago
They didn’t investigate the judges as I understand it
1 year ago
As Snowedin has stated on here before on another topic, I doubt anything was and will be done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 year ago
The supreme court would not see the leaker if he was staring them in the face.
1 year ago
Reply to
Snowedin
These clowns would not find the leaker if it was an elephant that just took a dump in front of them.
D
1 year ago
They are lying, we all know they are lying, they know we know, they don;t care.
D
1 year ago
Reply to
dunce
I agree. They will never name the name as it would make one of the members of SCOTUS look bad. The SCOTUS will quietly lay off the leaker and all will be well with all the members of SCOTUS’ reputations intact.
1 year ago
Spoiler alert – it was the new girl – Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The genius unable to define what a woman is!
https://twitter.com/D_B_Harrison/status/1506600201913466881?s=20
Last edited 1 year ago by AM1G0
1 year ago
Remember the Pogo comic strip? We have met the enemy and he is us.
D
1 year ago
This means they know who it is and it’s someone from a protected class.
1 year ago
Let’s admit it – SCOTUS is just another 3-letter agency.
D
1 year ago
It’s impossible to find something when you are not looking for it
1 year ago
One of the “justices” was “appointed” in February, 2022 and confirmed April 7, 2022.
The “leak” occurred May 2, 2022.
Ask her, UNDER OATH, is she “leaked”.
1 year ago
If the Court is this inept, corrupt and frankly un American, then why would we trust anything they do or say?
They have squandered their authority and now all they have is power.
1 year ago
The Republicans were stupid in giving this to the Supreme Court before the elections. Give everyone lie detectors tests.
1 year ago
BS. They keep it quiet in order to prevent further riots. Our government should clamp down on destructive rioters that want to burn our country down. These fckers need to be locked up for life.
1 year ago
My trust levels are low…could it have actually have been one of the justices? Hmmmm
D
1 year ago
How come FBI didn’t raid their homes yet?
D
1 year ago
I call crap on this. they know exactly who did it.
