The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty must be stopped. It risks superseding parliamentary democracy, public health laws and human rights within 194 countries. Unelected technocrats should never decide sovereign public health policy. Biden rejoined the USA into WHO. He is now looking into joining a “WHO Pandemic Control Treaty”.

The World Health Organization can declare a pandemic without justifying or even publishing their reasons. There is no appeal, no transparency, no fairness.

The Biden regime intends to sign the treaty which gives the WHO complete control to have a single body control any future pandemic, including censoring anyone who disagrees with any WHO actions.

If Biden signs the Pandemic Treaty giving the WHO it should be considered treason. We live in a Constitutional Republic. The power of every politician is drawn from the consent of the people as written in the Constitution.

In a few days, officials from your country are meeting to discuss a "Pandemic Treaty".

A draft proposal sits before the WHO in Geneva.

56 pages of acronyms, obscure references & nonsense.

I spent 12 hours translating it into English, so you can understand it in 12 minutes. pic.twitter.com/mtOWxgD0Cu

— Critical Sway (@CriticalSway) May 17, 2022

Jair Bolsonaro… Brazil *will not* sign the WHO Pandemic Treaty. “National sovereignty is not something to be handed over to WHO or other entities and to be renounced just to join a club of seemingly advanced nations”… pic.twitter.com/DdVSkHlzLd

— Pelham (@Resist_05) May 19, 2022

According the treaty, vaccines and essential medicines will not be distributed according to need but according to “equity”. Not the sickest, but the most favored. Further, there is no graver violation of medical ethics.

The Biden regime is handing over our sovereignty to third world charlatans.

▪️lockdown
▪️hard borders & quarantine zones
▪️vaccine passports
▪️mandatory contact tracing
▪️mandatory health tests
▪️mandatory removal & quarantine

Global government control.

WATCH THIS:

Tucker: Biden administration is close to giving WHO power over every intimate aspect of your life

Tucker calls out the violation of medical ethics and an alleged power grab by the W.H.O

By: Tucker Carlson, Fox News, May 20, 2022:

We want to open this evening with a story you may not have heard, but that you should definitely know about. It begins early last year when Joe Biden, in one of his very first acts as president, brought the United States back into the World Health Organization.

We saw this, and we thought: Why would Biden be so anxious to do something like that? At the time, we assumed it was just part of his larger de-orangification effort. Trump had pulled the U.S. out of the World Health Organization, so Biden had to do the opposite. Childish, but that seemed like a fair explanation.

Still, it did seem a little weird because there aren’t many international bodies that are more thoroughly discredited than the World Health Organization, particularly after COVID. It’s a laughingstock. There’s one thing it’s not good at, it’s public health.

Since the very first cases of the coronavirus were reported in Wuhan, the W.H.O. slavishly ran interference for the Chinese government and did it in the most cartoonish and obvious way. First, W.H.O. claimed there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission of the virus. Remember this? They cited Chinese officials who were obviously lying, and we now know they were lying.

Then, when it became clear the virus probably came out of a Chinese government lab, W.H.O. sabotaged the investigation into the origin of the virus by appointing a gain-of-function researcher to lead the investigative team. Pretty shocking, if you think about it and to this day, the W.H.O. still has not acknowledged it did any of that, though it definitely did.

Instead, they’ve continued to praise China’s response to COVID as “transparent,” which is the one thing it’s not. It’s almost amusing. But again, it’s weird if you think about it. Why would Joe Biden want to join a group that every informed person laughs at? Well, more than a year later, we think we know the answer. The Biden administration is very close to handing the World Health Organization power over every aspect, the intimate aspects, of your life.

So, imagine the civil liberties abuses that you lived through during the COVID lockdowns, but permanent and administered from a foreign country. Here’s what we’re looking at tonight. This January, the Biden administration submitted a series of proposed amendments to something called the International Health Regulations (the IHR). Now, the Biden administration’s amendments, along with those from several other countries, will be combined to create a new global pandemic treaty. “We need a pandemic treaty.” That treaty is set to be adopted starting this weekend in Geneva at the World Health Assembly.

Now, the full text of the treaty is not yet finished, but a W.H.O. working group has summarized what it’s going to look like. The document begins by promising to restrict the W.H.O’s authority just to pandemics. Calm down, it’s just pandemics: “W.H.O. Secretariat to play the leading, convening and coordinating role in operational aspects of emergency response to a pandemic.” 

So, don’t get paranoid. Someone just needs to coordinate the pandemic response globally because it’s a global problem. Got it? Settle down, conspiracy nut,

But here’s the catch. The World Health Organization gets to define what a pandemic is, when a pandemic is in progress and how long a pandemic lasts. Then you read the fine print and you realize the W.H.O will have total authority over emergency operations in the United States if there’s ever a “public health emergency.” Huh?

What qualifies exactly as a public health emergency? Well, they don’t define that, but they get to. They get to decide what a public health emergency is, and then they have total authority. You can see where this is going. Now, the Biden administration has made certain that unelected bureaucrats, the W.H.O., have total authority to declare and define public health emergencies. They did it explicitly. The White House eliminated a provision that would have required the World Health Organization to “consult with an attempt to obtain verification from the state party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in.”

President Biden delivers remarks during an event for the 2022 National and State Teachers of the Year in the White House on April 27, 2022, in Washington, D.C.  (Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

So, as originally written, they couldn’t do anything without the permission of their member countries’ governments. But thanks to the change that the Biden administration pushed, effectively there is no limit at all on W.H.O’s power and then it gets worse from there. The treaty also mandates a “whole of government and a whole of society approach to pandemic preparedness.” 

Think about that. Every society is always preparing for a pandemic, and that means there will not be a moment ever when the W.H.O. doesn’t have operational control over so-called public health matters in this country. Now, what’s that going to mean exactly? You’ve already guessed. It’s not really about public health. It never is, but before we tell you what exactly it’s going to mean, you should know that none of this is going to be optional.

Thanks to an amendment from the Biden administration, the treaty contains a provision for a compliance committee. oh, there’s always the stick. It provides that every member country in the W.H.O. must, “inform W.H.O. about the establishment of its national competent authority responsible for overall implementation of the IHR that will be recognized and held accountable.”

Under this treaty, W.H.O. members must enforce orders from the W.H.O. They have to act as the heavies for the W.H.O. and if they don’t, they’ll be sanctioned. The White House is going to be the muscle for the director of the World Health Organization.

So, who is the director of the World Health Organization?  Well, that would be a former member of Ethiopia’s Marxist-Leninist Party called Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. He once led the Ministry of Health in Ethiopia. He’s not a physician, but as the head of the Ministry of Health in Ethiopia for political reasons, he covered up three cholera outbreaks, the opposite of what he’s supposed to do. He wrote off cholera as simply acute watery diarrhea. He’s not a doctor, so maybe he didn’t know, but he did know. He did it for political reasons.

Those outbreaks are taking place among disfavored groups. Then, Tedros tried to appoint Robert Mugabe, the racist murderer who ran Zimbabwe into the ground as an international goodwill ambassador for public health. Now, at the time, Zimbabwe was the poorest, most mismanaged, most racist country in the world and yet Tedros thought he should be a goodwill ambassador for public health. These are some of the reasons that Tedros, needless to say, is a close friend of Tony Fauci’s.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, White House Chief Medical Advisor and Director of the NIAID, participates in the White House COVID-19 Response Team’s regular call with the National Governors Association in the South Court Auditorium in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House Campus, Monday, Dec. 27, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

DR. ANTHONY FAUCI:  So, Tedros is really an outstanding person. I’ve known him from the time that he was the Minister of Health of Ethiopia. I mean, obviously over the years, anyone who says that the W.H.O. has not had problems has not been watching the W.H.O., but I think under his leadership, they’ve done very well.  

Yeah, they’ve done very well. He’s an outstanding person, that friend of Robert Mugabe’s and because he’s such an outstanding person, we are days away from giving him operational control over our government’s public health system, the one that you pay for and thought you controlled in this democracy.

So, what will this operational control mean? Let’s be specific.

Right off the bat, the treaty demands, “national and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation and stigmatization that undermine public health.” Oh, here we go, right to censorship.

People are criticizing us and for public health reasons that can’t be allowed. If you criticize us, people will die.

So, you saw yesterday the Biden administration, in the face of universal laughter and derision, had to fire the head of its new Ministry of Truth, but they found another way to do it. “W.H.O. Secretariat to build capacity to deploy proactive countermeasures against misinformation and social media attacks.”

Oh. Are you following this? So, they’re going to get to censor anybody who doesn’t agree with what they do as they control the intimate details of your life and they will control those details. Under this treaty, the World Health Organization will get to establish vaccine passports and regulate travel. World Health Organization will “develop standards for producing a digital version of the International Certificate of vaccination and prophylaxis.”

Okay. So, you may be thinking, “Well, it’s just about COVID and I went along with mandatory vaccines and vaccine passports at the time. How bad could it be?” First of all, if you went along with that, you should be repenting right about now, but it’s not just about COVID, because W.H.O. will be in charge of, “the digitalization of all health forms.” World Health Organization will also “share real time information about travel measures.”

So, you’re going to find out exactly when you’re allowed to get on a bus or train or airplane or how about your bicycle? Will they regulate that too? Maybe. Now, the World Health Organization has sought this authority for years. Of course, who doesn’t want more power?

Here’s Tedros back in April of 2020.

TEDROS: People in countries with stay-at-home orders are understandably frustrated with being confined to their homes for weeks on end, but the world will not and cannot go back to the way things were. There must be a new normal – aworld that’s healthier, safer and better prepared.

Okay. So, there’s a guy with a long and documented history of subverting public health, who is clearly a liar, who is acting as an agent for the Chinese government, and you have to ask yourself, “Did I vote for that guy? Is he one of my elected representatives in this democracy? How did he get power over where I can travel and when?” Good question.

And it’s not just lockdowns that man Tedros would be able to dictate. The World Health Organization would also assume total control over vaccine manufacturing and distribution. We’re not making this up, by the way. According the document, W.H.O. would create a,”truly global end-to-end platform for vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics and essential supplies, shifting from a model where innovation is left to the market, to a model aimed at delivering global public goods.” Now, we’re not making it up. That’s a verbatim quote. It actually says that. No more innovation, centralized control.

According to the treaty, those vaccines and essential medicines—because it gets better on every page—will be distributed not on the basis of need, but on the basis of equity. Equity is quoted, says, “critically important for global health, both as a principle and as an outcome.” That’s what the treaty declares.

Therefore, the World Health Organization will ensure “equitable and effective access to vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics and essential supplies and for clinical trials” and that means, again quoting, “health care workers and the most vulnerable will have priority access.” Not the sickest, not the people who need the medicine most, but the most vulnerable in a larger sense. In other words, favored groups get medicine first.

There is no graver violation of medical ethics than this. Every physician, practicing in the United States, promises not to do what you just heard, and it would become mandatory under this treaty. And by the way, the language you just heard, that is exactly the justification that officials in several states threw out when they were caught passing out vaccines based on race. This is a power grab. It’s dangerous. It is, by the way, a reward to the very people who screwed up two years of COVID response. Oh, let’s give them more power. This is lunacy. And people who know that it’s happening are upset.

It’s a seismic grab of global power.

WHO’s push for new pandemic treaty stokes fears of global governance |

Just The News

Negotiations have begun to establish a globally binding agreement to combat future pandemics, raising concerns that such an accord would undermine national sovereignty and centralize too much power in the hands of the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations’ health agency.

In a recent open letter, the World Council for Health, a coalition of scientists, doctors, lawyers, and civil society advocacy organizations, lambasted the idea as dangerous and illegitimate.

“The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights,” the council wrote. “It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.”

Prominent health experts such as Drs. Pierre Kory and Astrid Stuckelberger have endorsed the council’s open letter and been outspoken against the treaty under discussion.

The agreement would effectively create one world government under the guise of creating a standardized global pandemic response, according to Stuckelberger, a member of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva and Lausanne.

“This pandemic committee wants everything in a standardized way,” she said. “One health, one government, one emergency all the time.”

Stuckelberger noted the WHO constitution gives it broad authority to adopt global regulations concerning standards and procedures to prevent the spread of disease, including quarantine and certain pharmaceutical requirements.

Others argue a pandemic treaty can address the holes exposed by the world’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“If the world was able to pass a strong pandemic treaty, it would turn a crisis into an opportunity — a historic, once in a lifetime opportunity,” said Georgetown University Professor of Global Health Law Lawrence Gostin in an interview. “We’re attempting to solve all the major gaps in pandemic response.”

Gostin and other supporters of such a new, “transformative” agreement note pandemics don’t recognize borders and argue the only way to fight them effectively is for the world to collaborate in better ways.

WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has criticized nations for adopting “‘me-first’ approaches that stymie the global solidarity needed to deal with a global threat,” referring to COVID-19.

In a recent article, Gostin similarly condemned “nationalistic leaders” for “taking a stance of ‘my country first.'”

The treaty they’re pushing is expected to include measures to improve information sharing between countries.

Gostin, who is director of the WHO’s Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law, added the treaty would require prompt reporting of outbreaks (which China came under fire for not doing with COVID-19), mandate investigations into the origins of outbreaks; and “try to embed equity in the pandemic response so we won’t have huge disparities in vaccine distribution between rich and poor.”

Skeptics worry an agreement could require countries to send a certain amount of its vaccines abroad, arguing it’s fine to share surplus vaccines but the priority must be helping a country’s own people first.

Others are concerned the treaty could supersede certain state and national laws and possibly require some form of health passports or digital IDs.

However, at this point there’s no actual document with specific items to be included in the agreement. The treaty is an idea being negotiated, and it’s unclear what a preliminary — let alone final — version would look like.

“The devil is in the details,” said Dr. Jeffrey Singer, a practicing general surgeon and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. “If the treaty involves cooperation between countries working together, especially sharing information, that’s a good thing. If it involves everyone having to listen to a central authority, that’s not a good thing.”

Noting that in the U.S. the concentration of power in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “led to mistakes,” Singer argued that big organizations should just focus on updating health experts around the world with the latest good information.

“When you have distant organizations trying to control things, there are always unintended consequences,” he said. “Pandemics act differently in different communities. The WHO’s main role should be information, and let us use that information as we need to locally.”

A major complaint of those opposed to the treaty idea is that it will give the WHO greater authority to declare a pandemic using a looser definition, forcing countries to impose certain restrictions in a uniform, global manner.

“Historically, the WHO leadership has failed the people,” wrote the World Council for Health in its open letter. “Among many examples, it approved the injurious H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine for a controversially declared pandemic. Equally, the WHO failed during the Covid-19 chapter as it encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments, and recommended product interventions that have proven to be neither safe nor effective.”

“The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda,” the letter continued.

On the other hand, University of Virginia law professor Margaret Riley, who teaches health law, noted that “done well, a treaty of this sort might help the WHO be more effective.”

Critics, including Republican lawmakers in the U.S, have scrutinized the WHO for being under China’s influence.

Whatever the treaty contains, one major issue for supporters is how to enforce compliance.

“Unless such a treaty includes mechanisms for real cooperation among major powers, it is unlikely to have a significant effect,” said Riley. “But it is a start.”

Gostin added that “we’re going to have to find better ways to get compliance, including incentives.”

In December, the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly, the WHO’s decision-making body, agreed to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement, or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.”

The decision established an intergovernmental negotiating body to draft what both supporters and opponents of the idea are calling an international “pandemic treaty.”

Negotiations for the treaty began last month, and the next meeting will be held by August to discuss progress on a working draft. The goal is to deliver a progress report to the World Health Assembly in 2023 and adopt the agreement by 2024………..

WHO Pandemic Treaty supersedes the laws of 194 countries. Public health decision making must always be a sovereign right of a country rather than unelected technocrats. #StopTheTreaty pic.twitter.com/37BebQvbSH

— James Melville 🚜 (@JamesMelville) May 11, 2022

Watch:

https://twitter.com/backtolife_2022/status/1525588834121138176?s=20&t=VJmz44BW4HX-hB78jn-eJw

https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1526205079287697408?s=20&t=VJmz44BW4HX-hB78jn-eJw

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

• $25.00 here
• $50.00 here
• $75.00 here
• $100.00 here
• $250.00 here