After Going to War Under False Pretenses in Iraq, High-Level Officials of the Biden Regime Want War With Russia

26

Newsweek reported Sunday that Igor Korotchenko, a Russian journalist, which essentially means a spokesman for the Russian government, “has claimed on state TV that the U.S. has declared war on the country following reports of the White House’s approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.” Korotchenko’s remarks “follow on from a previous statement made by the U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland.” Then on Wednesday, Elon Musk tweeted: “Nobody is pushing this war more than Nuland.” The UK’s far-Left Independent ridiculed Musk for this Thursday with an article entitled, “Elon Musk mocked for claiming ‘no one’ pushing Ukraine war more than US diplomat: ‘Putin for example?’” Yet there is good reason to believe that Musk is right.

Nuland said, according to Newsweek, that “Washington supports Ukrainian attacks on military targets on the peninsula and has called for it to be demilitarized. Crimea was illegally annexed by Russia from Ukraine in 2014.” Crimea’s population is largely Russian, and the Kremlin believes it to be rightly theirs. Consequently, attacks on Crimea could be the flashpoint that make the Russia-Ukraine war into World War III.

Korotchenko declared: “After the U.S. crossed every imaginable and unimaginable red line, today the U.S. State Department actually announced that it was going to war with Russia. I assume that this is how we should interpret Nuland’s statement. There is no need for halftones. The U.S. is an enemy of Russia, a military adversary.” He added: “If it expects massive missile strikes on Russian territory to be carried out with their help, but as if by someone else’s hands, then perhaps we can regard this as a casus belli (cause for war) and react accordingly.”

Story continues below advertisement

Michael Clarke, a professor in the War Studies department at King’s College London, dismissed Korotchenko’s statements: “This is just more bluster and repeats things being said on the channel at regular intervals.” Maybe so. But is it just more bluster from the Biden regime? Victoria Nuland is a longtime Washington insider who oversaw the 2014 revolution in Ukraine that led to the installation of the current regime, which has so many questionable ties to the Leftist establishment in the U.S., including suspicions of money-laundering. Would Nuland, therefore, have an interest in preserving and protecting that Ukrainian regime, even to the point of sparking a war between Russia and the United States?

Would an American official advocate going to war on such a flimsy pretext? There are precedents. On Friday, the investigative journalist who goes by the name “Kanekoa” tweeted: “Victoria Nuland’s husband, Robert Kagan, wrote an open letter to George W. Bush nine days after the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, urging him to invade Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein ‘even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack.’”

The letter to Bush, of which the chief signer was William Kristol, states: “We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein ‘is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….’ It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”

The Iraqi government hadn’t aided in the 9/11 attacks, and Saddam wasn’t among the chief sponsors of international terrorism. But the invasion went ahead anyway, with disastrous results both for Iraq and for the U.S. Now, Kagan and Nuland might be the George and Kellyanne Conway of the foreign policy establishment; they might not see eye-to-eye on Iraq, or Ukraine, or anything else. But there is certainly good reason to believe that Nuland, at very least, is part of a coterie of foreign policy “experts” who are happy to see war come, for the benefits they perceive it would bring.

These people have learned no lessons from the debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan, and have been casting around now for a new source of income for the military industrial complex now the catastrophe in Afghanistan has ended what was once a profitable cash cow. Are they hoping to get us into World War III? The possibility cannot be ruled out.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tony Whiterossich
Tony Whiterossich
1 year ago

False flags, unfortunately, are what characterize US foreign policy. And this fact is destructive both for America and for the whole world.

T D
T D
1 year ago

RUSSIANS are Neo-cons.
Never met a war they didn’t like. Never met a dictator they didn’t like. fact.

They arrest anti-war protesters, thousands each month.

They make John Bolton look like a member of the CATO institute.

Last edited 1 year ago by T D
T D
T D
1 year ago

RUSSIA is the largest state-sponsor of Islamist Terrorism.
Supporters of Hamas, IRAN, Syria, and Hezzbolah.

You can’t be an anti-Islamist and also be Pro-Russia.

It seems that Robert Spencer, Geller Report, and some in the Anti-Islamist community have a blind spot.

Last edited 1 year ago by T D
garry pollackD
garry pollack
1 year ago
Reply to  T D

U can’t eff w/them & expect them 2 play patty cake w/U!!!

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  garry pollack

They don’t play patty cake with anyone.
Russian supremacists don’t get along with anyone, not even the Swiss who are neutral.

Not even Moldova which is neutral too.
Not even other Russians like the Belarus, Ukraine, Chechnya.

sally
sally
1 year ago
Reply to  T D

not! we are the terrorists. we have started every war after WW1. we are bullies. no wonder we are hated by most other countries. we take their country and ravish the land. Bush..you know, Poppy took over the poppy fields and the CIA ran the drugs. do your research..you are so far off. Putin destroyed the labs that were killing children for drugs.

armaros
armaros
1 year ago
Reply to  sally

We started WWII
Do tell….

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  sally

” we have started every war after WW1″
Lost credibility right here. Didn’t read the rest of the comment past this statement.

Last edited 1 year ago by T D
armaros
armaros
1 year ago
Reply to  T D

The KGB (that Putin was a ranked member of in East Germany) created the PLO and ran its anti-Israel campaigns and terrorism through East Germany

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  armaros

And Russia’s continues to try and destabilize Israel, Post cold war 1.

Like I said, Russian Nationalists don’t get along with anyone. Ukraine, Poland, Israel, even Switzerland which is neutral. Or Moldova which is neutral. They don’t even get along with other Russians like Belarus, Chechnya, Ukraine.

Master Turkeychoker
Master Turkeychoker
1 year ago

well, i think all our politicians who call for escalating conflicts, should buy ar`s, hop on a boat & go join in the wars, instead of shootin off their well fed flabby mouths about it.

armaros
armaros
1 year ago

No peace can exist between Russia and Ukriane (negotiate or otherwise) with Crimea remaining a militarized Russian occupied territory.
It is not a “peninsula” but sovereign territory of Ukraine.
It was from Crimea that Russia moved its invader army from into Ukraine and it is from the Crimea that Russia attempts to control all of the Black Sea, which is a critical trade route for Europe, Turkey, the Caucasus, Ukraine, and Russia

It is logical for Ukraine to take it back or to neutralize it as a source for more Russian attacks.
And they have been nice about it because Ukraine, by having retaken Kherson is now in control of the Crimean freshwater supply. If they turn off the spigot, the Russians in Crimea will die to thirst or will have to vacate.
In any peace settlement Crimea has to either be split up like Cyprus, taken 100% back by Ukraine, or remain Russian BUT with a 30 or 50 year guarantee of demilitarization.
This is not just a Ukrainian goal but also a goal of every nation and entity that uses the Black Sea for trade. Hence the support given to Ukraine from so many countries. 54 to be exact.
Without the Black Sea Europe will be beholden to Russia for its food and agro supplies. As will be other
Nobody will grant Russia a veto on their food, fertilizer, and food production supplies. Especially not after this aggression.

armaros
armaros
1 year ago

We all supported the invasion of Iraq. Perhaps in retrospect wrongly
The support this page and I had for it wasn’t based on Saddam’s alleged involvement in 911 but his funding of terrorism in Israel and his desire to go for the Saudi oil fields.

The people who orchestrated it weren’t just these democrats like Nuland
It was Cheney, it was Bush, it was Wolfowitz, Perle, Bolton, and even Joe Biden and Hilary
Those who opposed it were Obama and Trump

There’s no plan to take out Putin. Only Putin can take out Putin

Snowedin
Snowedin
1 year ago

The only reason why the US was in Iraq was for the industrial military complex to make money which the dick cheney, both bush and many other corrupt, dirty, politicians had an interest in. The ones responsible for 911 as everyone knows were the Saudis and probably some American politicians. It had to be an inside job as the building that was not hit by an airplane went down for no reason.

angelo
angelo
1 year ago

For the past 30 years, the aggressors have been the US and NATO with encouragement from Washington. How would Washington react to a new Cuban missile crisis. Or imagine Russia or China placing missiles in Mexico or Canada, all aimed at US?

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  angelo

BILL CLINTON negotiated away NATO’s nuclear weapons in the NATO Founding Deal of 1997.
No nuclear weapons for any new NATO members on the Eastern side.
The deal was to appease Russia. Didn’t work.

Putin brought back the Soviet National Anthem in his first term 20+ years ago.
No way was NATO just going to sit back.

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  angelo

Uh let me see:
We expand NATO to prevent Russia from rebuilding the Soviet Union, which is justified.

Russia or China expanding their new version of the Soviet Union in our sphere – not justified.

edD
ed
1 year ago

Forget the ugly stick….Nuland got hit by the whole ugly FORREST !!!!!

LaddyboyD
Laddyboy
1 year ago

Millions of people are tired of the fighting and killing that is going on around the world “in the name of peace” and “they stole my property”! GET BACK TO THE TABLE AND SETTLE THIS ARGUMENT WITH WORDS!!!!!

Stephanie WilsonD
Stephanie Wilson
1 year ago

This is a lie. Bush was right. Why are you parroting the left??! http://reasons-for-war-with-iraq.info

Sly
Sly
1 year ago

You want the face of pure evil, take a look at this traitorous , evil, ugly warmongering, pathological liar Victoria Nuland

TRM
TRM
1 year ago

Now you’re repeating claims from Russian TV.

Putin undoubtedly appreciates Spencer’s and Geller’s continuing support.

T D
T D
1 year ago
Reply to  TRM

“Now you’re repeating claims from Russian TV.”

Yes. Geller Report at least reads RT News, which is run by the Russian Government.
It’s just as bad as Chinese news or MS-NBC.

Jasmine
Jasmine
1 year ago
Reply to  T D
armaros
armaros
1 year ago
Reply to  Jasmine

The same happened in East Germany
Former Nazi Regime officials, including from the SS and Gestapo got positions in the DDR’s security apparatus.
In fact, the DDR funded Neo-Nazi elements inside West Germany
The money conduit was Francois Genoud, the Swiss Nazi who also funded the PFLP which was trained by the DDR and worked with the Marxist Baader Meinhof Gang (aka Red Army Faction) on the Entebbe hijacking

Meanwhile, war criminals from the Soviet Red Army took control of the Warsaw Pact nations.

armaros
armaros
1 year ago
Reply to  TRM

I don’t think Pamela or Robert support Putin
They never glorified him or praised him or even justified the invasion.
Where they’re wrong is in their assessment of Ukraine and the place in history (and geopolitics) this war occupies. They’re focused on the conjecture of why not help America / close the border while Ukraine is getting this and that…
They are naive about the dangers of Russia and the threats it poses to European stability and peace.
There are people on the Right who support and praise Putin. Not Pamela and Robert, but unfortunately a good number of people who see the enemy of their enemy as a friend and gobbled up the Putin propaganda that he’s some savior of the West and Christianity because he made speeches against LGBT radicalism, trans idiocy, and the general moral degeneracy of the West brought by the Left and the Globalist elite.
Hitler too ran on these themes for popularity outside of Germany and it worked for him as many did see him as a saviour or at least as a reaction to the degeneracy of the 20s, the decadence seen in Paris and Berlin, and the injustices meted out on ordinary Europeans who were climbing out of the destruction of WWI.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!