My former NYU colleague, Corinna Hawkes, who now directs the Agrifood Systems and Food Safety Division at FAO in Rome, sent a link to its new publication, Transforming Food and Agriculture through a Systems Approach.

This publication provides an organizing framework for applying a systems approach to the transformation of food and agriculture. Building on evidence from systems science and practical real-world examples from countries, it identifies six core elements of a systems approach and specifies key practices and shifts needed to implement in practice. It includes examples from across the world of how systems-based practices are already being taken forward at different scales.

This publication is about food systems, why they matter, and how to use a food systems approach to improve food quality and access.

It is beautifully illustrated.  The definition:

And here’s how it works.

There is much more in this report.  I view it as a how-to manual. Use it!

Resources

• Download the publication: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd6071en
• Dr. Hawkes’ Tweet and Post about the report
• Register for briefing sessions: 12 September (11-12 CEST) or 15 September (15-16 CEST)

David Kessler, a physician, lawyer, and former FDA Commissioner, has done a great service for the Make America Healthy Again movement.  He has written a letter to RFK Jr presenting a Citizen’s Petition to the FDA: “Petition to Limit the Exposure of Refined
Carbohydrates used in Industrial Processing in order to Prevent Obesity, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease in Children and Adults.”

His petition argues that processed refined carbohydrates should no longer be considered Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS).

These are:

1) refined sweeteners, including corn syrup, corn solids, glucose syrups, dextrose, invert sugar, xylose, maltose, and high fructose corn syrups; and maltodextrin

2) refined flour and starches that are subjected to food extrusion technology, including wheat, corn, tapioca, oat and potato  flour, and starches that are processed by extraction or similar technology, and

3) sucrose, refined flours, or starches that are used with emulsifiers (e.g. mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, DATEM, sodium stearoyl lactylate, polysorbates); dough conditioners and strengtheners (e.g. azodicarbonamide, L-cysteine, calcium peroxide); humectants (e.g. propylene glycol); stabilizers and gums (e.g. carboxymethylcellulose, methylcellulose); or modified starches and fillers (e.g. regelatinized starch, modified food starch, dextrins).

The carefully argued and lengthy petition makes a strong case for the unhealthy nature of processed refined carbohydrates.

Wow.

If the FDA agrees—and it has to deal with the petition within 180 days—these ingredients would no longer be GRAS and foods containing them would be considered adulterated and illegal to sell.

Here’s what I said to the press:

• This would cover an extraordinarily large percentage of foods that are ultraprocessed…an extraordinarily impressive document” (New York Times).
• Kessler has given the FDA a way to define the vast majority of ultra-processed foods. In doing so, he has handed RFK Jr a huge gift on the path to regulating these products. It’s just what MAHA has asked for. I hope they take it seriously (CNN).

Can’t wait to see how RFK Jr and the FDA handle this.

The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) commission was rumored to be releasing its second report, this one on policy, yesterday, but that did not happen.

CNN reported: “New ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report to be released in weeks”

The commission is “on track” to deliver its report to the White House by August 12, White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. “The report will be unveiled to the public shortly thereafter as we coordinate the schedules of the President and the various cabinet members who are a part of the Commission.”

We have had plenty of hints about what it might be promoting:

• Get rid of artificial foods dyes   [ok]
• Cane sugar is better than high fructose corn syrup.  [not when it comes to sugars and calories]
• Beef tallow is better than seed oils [not when it comes to heart disease risk].
• Close the GRAS loophole (the rule that lets food companies say whether the additives they use are safe).  [good idea, about time]

According to Politico, after an

outcry from major food businesses and farm groups that are traditionally allies to Trump, the White House promised to stay away from a crackdown on pesticides and avoid surprising the food industry with new additive targets or regulations.  Industry insiders are expecting the report to…secure more voluntary commitments from companies on the transition to natural food dyes, define “ultra-processed foods,” update the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, reform the “generally recognized as safe” designation and limit recipients of federal food aid from purchasing junk food with their benefits.

I love Politico’s quote from a food industry lobbyist: “The White House has certainly gotten the message, both from agriculture and the food sector, that they are on the edge of a nanny state…Like this is Michelle Obama on steroids. The message we’ve gotten from the White House is, ‘Don’t worry, we’re not letting the crazy people run rampant over the food sector.’”

In anticipation of the report’s release, Food and Water Watch issued a statement: “Making America Healthy Will Require Big Ag Confrontation, Not Capitulation.”

The MAHA Commission’s report is a smokescreen designed to draw attention away from the Trump Administration’s dangerous deregulatory agenda. The report will be most notable in what it lacks: any real action on glyphosate, linked to rising cancer rates nationwide…Food & Water Watch research finds that Bayer has spent over $21 million on federal lobbying since the federal Cancer Gag Act…in 2023… — a 43 percent increase over the past ten quarters. State spending is also on the rise. In the past year, Bayer spent more on lobbying than any other year on record in Iowa, a key battleground state where 89% of voters oppose the Cancer Gag Act. The bill failed.

Clearly, much is at stake.  It looks like MAHA versus the realities of MAGA.

I can’t wait to see how this one resolves and hope the wait isn’t too long.  Stay tuned for this one.

Addition August 15: The New York Times seems to have gotten a leaked copy.of the report.  It has plenty to say about this early draft.

The American Heart Association (AHA) has issued its long-awaited advisory on ultra-processed foods and heart health (and the CDC, just in time, says just about everyone consumes more than half their calories as UPFs).

The AHA advisory is complicated, somewhat schizophrenic in my view.

It says UPFs are bad for you but makes a big deal over how some UPFs are good for you.

It does not seem helpful to make a big fuss over the few UPF foods that are nutritious.

I say this for two reasons: The number of foods in that category is small, and a study of the effects of “healthy” UPFs still finds that people eat more calories from them than they would from minimally processed foods (I will write about this study when Nature Medicine publishes it and my accompanying editorial).

The key statement in the AHA report:

A small number of UPF products such as whole-wheat breads and unsweetened soy milk with emulsifiers can support nutrition security in low-income and low-access communities by offering convenient, affordable, and palatable options. However, the strong evidence linking HFSS {high fat, sugar, salt] UPFs to increased cardiovascular risk underscores the need for targeted policy interventions to regulate their availability, marketing, and accessibility in disproportionately affected communities.

The operative word here is “small.” This is a trivial issue, not worth fussing about.

Obviously the AHA committee thought so too.

Here is my translation of the report’s recommendations.

1. Replace most UPFs with real foods.
2. Enact policies to reduce UPFs, like front-of-package labels and taxation.
3. Increase research funding on UPFs and heart health.
4. Get the FDA to do a better job of assessing and regulating food additives.

I can’t argue with that.  Good job!

Resources

• The CNN article on this report (I’m quoted)
• The AHA press release
• The report’s supplemental tables

NutraIngredients-Europe, a newsletter I subscribe to, published this gem: Salmon nose cartilage for younger skin?  Supplementing with salmon nose cartilage could significantly reduce signs of skin aging in the middle aged…. Read more

What’s great about the newsletters in this series is that they provide references.  I went right to this one.

The study: Clinical Trial of Salmon Nasal Cartilage-Derived Proteoglycans on Human Facial Antiaging: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.  J Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025;24(7):e70218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70218

Background: “Proteoglycans (PGs) derived from salmon nasal cartilage are believed to have antiaging effects on the skin.”

Methods: This was a two-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing 20 mg PG to a placebo.

Results: “Subjects receiving PG supplementation showed significant improvements in skin elasticity and hydration…with reductions in skin roughness and wrinkles…and a significant decrease in melanin content and brown spots.”

Conclusion: “Our findings suggest that daily oral intake of 20 mg PG effectively improves skin health by enhancing elasticity, hydration, and reducing signs of aging such as wrinkles and pigmentation.”

Funding: “This study was supported by the Shanghai Huiwen Biotech Corp. Ltd., Shanghai, China.”  As NutraIngredients-Europe helpfully explains, “Founded in 2001 as a spin out of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Huiwen Biotech Co. produces its salmon nose cartilage powder using a water-based enzymatic extraction process.”

Comment: My big question: How do you harvest salmon nose cartilege?  I’m trying to imagine how they do this.  Oh well.

Dietary supplements never fail to fascinate me.  There is so little evidence for their benefits, and what evidence there is almost invariably is paid for by whoever profits from them.  Never mind.  If you are worried about wrinkles, you can give this a try.  It is unlikely to be harmful–the supplement should soon be broken down by enzymes.  Whether they really do anything or not, supplements make takers feel better.  Worth it?  You decide.

I’ve gotten way behind on posting reports, so I thought I’d take care of several today.  These international reports on one or another aspect of food systems are all worth a read.

The UK Food Resilience report: Just in Case: 7 steps to narrow the UK civil food resilience gap

This is Tim Lang’s masterful analysis of what the UK needs to bounce back after interruptions to its food supply.  The UK currently depends on emergency services from police, ambulance, firefighters, and rescue services, but these “have next to no engagement on food matters.” The report considers who and what is needed to make sure populations have enough to eat during crises of one kind or another.  There is much useful to be learned here.

The U.K.’s food strategy (Thanks to Lindsay Graham for this one)

This document sets out the context and key challenges facing the food system, a high-level vision of what the UK food system of the future looks like, its approach to a patriotic campaign to realise that vision, what will make the vision a reality, and the next steps that need to be taken.

Health & Global Food Systems: An Investor’s Guide (Thanks to Carlos Monteiro for sending)

The Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group — the world’s seventh-largest bank with US$2.8 trillion in assets — explains in detail why ultra-processed foods pose major risks to food sector investors, and urges them to push companies to cut reliance on these products.

IFPRI’s 2025 Global Food Policy Report | Food Policy: Lessons and Priorities for a Changing World

This report examines the evolution and impact of food policy research and assesses how it can do better. Written by IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), it explores a broad range of issues and research related to food systems, from tenure and agriculture extension to social protection, gender, and nutrition to conflict, political economy, and agricultural innovation, and more.  A textbook!

That’s enough for today.  More to come!

I could hardly believe it when I saw this item: Taiwan state distillery taps food market with alcohol-based instant noodles.   Taiwan’s state distillery has diversified into the food industry with alcohol-based instant noodles, blending beverage expertise with ready-to-eat innovation… Read more

The Taiwan Tobacco and Liquor Corporation (TTL)’s

most well-known products are Taiwan Beer which is considered an icon in Taiwanese culture and also the most popular beer locally; as well as traditional Chinese Hua Tiao wine.

The latter has been used in TTL’s instant noodle innovation to create its viral TTL Hua Tiao Chicken Noodles, which incorporate not only significant Hua Tiao wine content but also Chinese herbs and meat chunks.

“These are not your average instant noodles – Hua Tiao wine elevates the noodles to another level, as it is traditionally known for its antioxidant content as well as benefits for digestion and blood circulation….”We already have the alcohol in production, and we are indeed well-known for our liquors, so it made a lot of sense to us.”

I’ll bet.

I suppose young people will have to be carded to be allowed to eat it.  Whatever.  You can’t make this stuff up!

Forthcoming November 11, 2025

For Information and Pre-Orders, click here

The safety of pet food matters because we have one and only one food supply.  If pet food is unsafe, our safety is at risk.

You don’t believe me?  Try this: Darwin’s raw pet food linked to human case of E. coli O157:H7 in four-year-old child

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is advising the public not to feed certain lots of Darwin’s Natural Pet Products raw food to their pets after a four-year-old child became ill with E. coli O157:H7…The child was hospitalized, and developed a severe case of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), requiring dialysis. He spent a total of six weeks in hospital and is at risk of permanent injury to his kidneys.

The world of people who care about this sort of thing and demand that authorities do something about it is a small one.  I learned about this from Phyllis Entis, author of  TAINTED. From Farm Gate to Dinner Plate, Fifty Years of Food Safety Failures and TOXIC. From Factory to Food Bowl, Pet Food Is a Risky Business.

She learned about it from food safety advocate Bill Marler.  As the food alert explains,

The contamination came to light after food-safety attorney, William Marler, initiated third-party testing of an previously unopened package of BioLogics All-Natural and Grain Free, Beef Recipe for Dogs found E. coli O157:H7 in the raw, frozen product. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) confirmed that the strain found in the pet food was a match for the strain recovered from the child…when Marler reviewed the files once more, he noted that the family had a dog, and…learned that the dog exclusively ate Darwin’s pet food, and had begun vomiting one day before the child fell ill…Marler arranged for an accredited third-party laboratory to test the sealed packages of food that were still in the family’s freezer.

Marler has plenty of work to do.  He now asks: After Listeria, Salmonella and E. coli positive samples, and HUS in a child, why no mandatory recall by the FDA?

In less than one year Darwin’s Natural Pet Products have been found to be contaminated with Listeria, Salmonella (three times) and E. coli O157:H7.  This year Dawin’s pet food has been epidemiologically and genetically linked to kidney failure in a young child in Utah.

Yet, although Darwin’s has refused voluntary recalls in both instances, the question must be asked, why has the FDA not used its mandatory recall authority?

Comment: It’s great that Bill Marler took lthis on but shouldn’t this be the FDA’s responsibility?  Producers are supposed to produce foods safely—by law.  The FDA is responsible for making sure they do.  Its responsibilities apply to pet foods and well as human foods.  Raw pet food is uncooked and potentially risky; it requires vigilant attention to prevention controls.  This line of pet foods is not getting needed attention to food safety.  The FDA should be enforcing food safety rules, vigilantly, and yes for pet foods too.  What happened to this child and his family was entirely preventable.

Note to dog lovers: if you feed your pet raw food, you are taking a risk, and not only to your animal.

Forthcoming November 11, 2025

For Information and Pre-Orders, click here