[ May 1, 2024 ]
Free states versus slave states.
Photo: Lockdown Protesters Gathered Outside Capitol Calling To Reopen The State
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down Tony Evers’ stay-at-home order that closed businesses, schools to limit spread of coronavirus
By: Molly Beck and Patrick Marley, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 13, 2020 =
Story continues below advertisementMADISON – The Wisconsin Supreme Court has struck down Gov. Tony Evers’ order shutting down daily life to limit the spread of coronavirus — marking the first time a statewide order of its kind has been knocked down by a court of last resort.
The state’s highest court sided with Republican lawmakers Wednesday in a decision that curbed the Evers administration’s power to act unilaterally during public health emergencies.
The 4-3 decision was written by four of the court’s conservatives — Chief Justice Patience Roggensack and Justices Rebecca Bradley, Daniel Kelly and Annette Ziegler.
The court’s fifth conservative, Brian Hagedorn, wrote a dissent joined by the court’s two liberals, Ann Walsh Bradley and Rebecca Dallet.
The court issued the decision a month after Kelly lost his seat on the court. He will be replaced in August by Dane County Circuit Judge Jill Karofsky, a liberal who beat him by 10 points in the April 7 election.
The ruling mmediately threw out the administration’s tool to control a disease for which there is no vaccine. It came after Evers had already begun lifting some restrictions because the spread of the virus has slowed for now.
To put any limits in place, the Democratic governor and Republican-controlled Legislature will be forced to work together to deal with the ebbs and flows of the outbreak — something the two sides have rarely been able to achieve before.
With no COVID-19 policies in place, bars, restaurants and concert halls are allowed to reopen — unless local officials implement their own restrictions. That raises the prospect of a patchwork of policies, with rules varying significantly from one county to the next.
GOP leaders offered no immediate response to the decision or indicated whether they wanted to put any limits in place to fight the pandemic. State Sen. Dan Feyen, R-Fond du Lac, contended in a statement that state officials would develop a reopening plan soon and in the mean time citizens should exercise “good old-fashioned common sense and personal responsibility.”
But the Legislature’s top leaders, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos of Rochester and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau, remained mum about what plan they might try to advance for the state.
In the majority opinion, Roggensack determined Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm should have issued regulations through a process known as rule making, which gives lawmakers veto power over agency policies.
Without legislative review, “an unelected official could create law applicable to all people during the course of COVID-19 and subject people to imprisonment when they disobeyed her order,” the majority wrote.
Other justices saw it differently.
“This decision will undoubtedly go down as one of the most blatant examples of judicial activism in this court’s history. And it will be Wisconsinites who pay the price,” Dallet wrote in her dissent.
GOP lawmakers who brought the lawsuit have said the legal challenge was necessary to get a seat at the table where Evers and state health officials make decisions about how to respond to the outbreak, which has killed 418 people in the state in two months.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin are providing this story for free. For more coronavirus coverage, sign up for our daily newsletter. To support local journalism, consider subscribing to one of our publications.
The ruling was issued a day after a poll showed the public trusts Evers more than the Republican-led Legislature on when to begin reopening and relaxing restrictions related to the outbreak.
Evers has maintained his administration needs to be nimble and is relying on health experts to guide his decisions. He has said the procedure GOP lawmakers successfully sought will mean the state won’t be able to act quickly.
Hagedorn, who worked as chief legal counsel for former GOP Gov. Scott Walker, wrote in one of the court’s two dissents that the administration did not need permission to order such restrictions.
“In striking down most of Order 28, this court has strayed from its charge and turned this case into something quite different than the case brought to us,” Hagedorn wrote. “To make matters worse, it has failed to provide almost any guidance for what the relevant laws mean, and how our state is to govern through this crisis moving forward. The legislature may have buyer’s remorse for the breadth of discretion it gave to (the Department of Health Services). But those are the laws it drafted; we must read them faithfully whether we like them or not.”
Rebecca Bradley criticized Hagedorn, typically one of her allies, writing that his argument “contains no constitutional analysis whatsoever, affirmatively rejects the constitution, and subjugates liberty.”
The majority concluded Evers has broader powers during emergencies, but stressed that those powers have limits.
“If a forest fire breaks out, there is no time for debate. Action is needed. The governor could declare an emergency and respond accordingly. But in the case of a pandemic, which lasts month after month, the governor cannot rely on emergency powers indefinitely,” Roggensack wrote for the majority.
Michael Maistelman, an attorney who at times has represented Evers, said the justices had “legislated from the bench to make up their own laws to satisfy their political ends.”
“This action will inevitably lead to more sickness and more death,” he said in a text message. “The court will have blood on their hands and the people of Wisconsin will not forget.”
Wisconsin was one of 43 states to be locked down by its governor and as of Wednesday, it was one of 11 with such restrictions still in place.
At the heart of the lawsuit was a state law governing communicable diseases that says the Department of Health Services “may close schools and forbid public gatherings in schools, churches, and other places to control outbreaks and epidemics,” and gives it the power to “authorize and implement all emergency measures necessary to control communicable diseases.”
But the majority found Palm also had to follow another state law that requires regulations to be submitted to a legislative committee that can block them.
The first laws providing emergency powers to government officials were crafted in 1887, about 30 years before the 1918 flu pandemic that epidemiologists have said is similar to this year’s coronavirus outbreak.
In 1981, amid the HIV and AIDS epidemic, the state Legislature gave the power to DHS to issue orders — instead of using rulemaking.
Wednesday’s ruling came after a few thousand protested against the governor’s restrictions at rallies across the state, some comparing Evers to a murderous dictator and others complaining the order had nearly ruined their livelihoods.
More than 500,000 people filed for unemployment benefits after Evers ordered the closure of businesses providing what he has defined as non-essential, such as bars, hair salons and tattoo parlors.
But the orders also had broad support from the public. A poll released Tuesday by Marquette University Law School showed 69% of voters surveyed believed Evers’ actions were appropriate, though that support had decreased since March when more than 80% supported the restrictions.
Support and opposition has largely fallen along partisan lines.
Less than an hour after the ruling was released, the Tavern League of Wisconsin told its members they could greet customers again in their bars and urged them to adopt safety guidelines recommended by the state’s economic development agency.
The decision was not a surprise after Evers and his administration came under fire last week by conservative justices during oral arguments.
“Isn’t it the very definition of tyranny for one person to order people to be imprisoned for going to work among other ordinarily lawful activities?” asked Rebecca Bradley, who later questioned whether the administration could use the same power to order people into centers akin to the U.S. government’s treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
During discussions over the validity of Wisconsin’s ‘safer at home’ plan, Justice Rebecca Bradley compares it to the Japanese Internment camps of World War II. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Evers and his attorney said the lawsuit would upend life-saving measures and needlessly put more residents’ health — and their lives — at risk.
“Everyone understands such an order would be absolutely devastating and extraordinarily unwise,” Assistant Attorney General Colin Roth said during arugments. “If safer-at-home (order) is enjoined with nothing to replace it, and people pour out into the streets, then the disease will spread like wildfire and we’ll be back in a terrible situation with an out-of-control virus with no weapon to fight it — no treatments, no vaccine, nothing.”
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
16 Comments
3 years ago
What these DEM governors are doing is totally unConstitutional! They are power hungry, controlling tyrants, not being reasonable. They are so sick, they are willing to totally collapse our economy and rearange our world to get Trump out. That is ALL ths amounts to. When people RISE UP, they BACK DOWN. They know they can’t win this one.
Attorney General Bill Barr Issues DOJ Memo:
“The Constitution is Not Suspended in Times of Crisis”…
Posted on April 27, 2020 by sundance
The U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Bill Barr, has issued a memo (pdf here)
https://www.justice.gov/opa/page/file/1271456/download
citing a needed balance between COVID-19 mitigation efforts and U.S. civil rights under the constitution. Notably AG Barr identifies both “religious freedom”, and “undue interference with the national economy” within his memo.
…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/27/attorney-general-bill-barr-issues-doj-memo-the-constitution-is-not-suspended-in-times-of-crisis/
3 years ago
Reply to
felix1999
It ain’t just “DEM” governors. In Nohio (special emphasis upon the “No”), little mikki da-whiner has placed almost as many draconian “orders” as any of the totalitarian, fascist Left Wingnuts have.
That thing is not only a disgrace to the Republican Party, mikki da-whiner is a disgrace to humankind.
3 years ago
When I was a proposal coordinator for a company in Oak Ridge, I reduced the “boilerplate” legalize from 23 pages to 3. The manager checked with his personal attorney, who said my version carried all the protections needed.
The authors of this article need to reflect on their extremely verbose post.
3 years ago
Reply to
tedlv
The verbose article you refer to, tedlv, was written by Molly Beck and Patrick Marley of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, not Pam Geller or this site. So your comment should really go to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
3 years ago
Sign, everyone needs to sign!
3 years ago
The virus was supposed to give Democrats a smear campaign and a fear campaign. The smear campaign didn’t work. The fear campaign to “justify” voting by mail nationwide didn’t work. Voting by mail in key states is still part of the calculation, but the lockdowns they’re using aren’t working out very well to that end. The lockdowns are also a distraction from the past, which has been a top priority since 2016. Treason, and the players involved, must be concealed or the Democrats won’t take the WH. They’ve been protecting that information by every possible means.
The clowns and freaks we’ve been forced to look at, including Biden, are not going to win the next election. All the Democrats look rotten if you focus on them for long. When the chosen one rises up we’re supposed to be so sick freaks and clowns and dirty crooks that she’ll look clean, and so will her running mate. Exposure of the past is their worst nightmare because it reveals the treason during the Obama regime and two of the players involved who are supposed to look clean when they pop up at the last moment to run in the next election.
3 years ago
This is what happens when these tiny tyrant governors conveniently mistake suggestions for instructions and impose their own individual will on the citizenry.
3 years ago
Meantime, I have a firm impression of the interlinking between DEMOCRATS, CPC, WHO and FAUCI.
CORRUPT LIAR FAUCI is just one powerful slimy grimace of the HYDRA.
SHIFTY BIRX is the despicable Yeasayer and Staffage in the background.
Their hands are as bloody as the CPC and WHO and DEMOCRATS.
3 years ago
This ruling restores the Rule Of Sanity to Wisconsin. Why should the rest of the state shut down because there is a hot spot in Milwaukee? Let The legislature and the local authorities determine what is best. 3/4 of the counties in the USA have little or no CCP Virus cases. Should hey shut down because a few high-density counties have outbreaks? Who is going to supply food and necessities to hot spot cities? The people, including some deluded libtards, are beginning to understand these shutdowns are simply an exercise by wannabee tyrants of powers they do not have.
3 years ago
Reply to
John Acord
Milwaukee is a nonwhite-majority hell-hole that is approximately 40% black, which largely explains why it’s a “hot spot” for the Chinese-Wuhan virus. Thus to reopen cities and counties that are 90% white while Milwaukee remains in “lockdown” would be “racist” and “discriminatory.” That is why Evers and the left insist the entire state be shutdown when most of the state should have never been shutdown. the economy of the state must be destroyed and myriads of people must lose they jobs and liberties because blacks in Milwaukee are more likely to be afflicted with the Chinese-Wuhan virus.
3 years ago
Reply to
John Acord
I live in Eau Claire, a college town of 70,000 in west-central Wisconsin. The last I heard, there were some 20-25 cases of covid19 and no deaths in the city and county but the city has been shutdown since March 18. I was exercising at Anytime Fitness, watching Tucker Carlson on TV while riding a stationary bicycle, when at 7:10 PM the manager told me I had to leave, immediately, because of the corona virus. He just received a phone call from the health department, apparently. I couldn’t exercise for another 45-50 minutes and catch the 8 PM bus. I had to walk home, roughly 2-miles in pouring rain. Since then, I’ve been denied the right to exercise, 6-nights a week from 6-9 PM, for almost 2 months. Now that the SC has “stuck down” Evers’ shutdown, how long must I wait to have the right to exercise again? A week, 2 weeks, even longer? I’m not optimistic
3 years ago
Freedom from Government tyranny! Hoorah!
3 years ago
Will be interesting to see if Republicans have the guts to end the neurotic lock down in Wisconsin. Open America fire Fauci.
3 years ago
“If … people pour out into the streets, then the disease will spread like wildfire and we’ll be back in a terrible situation”.
It’s only about controlling society. Period.
3 years ago
How come no one asks if these governors’ executive orders have any legality on the general public? Did any legislature pass them as laws? If they did go through state legislatures, because I haven’t seen any news report that claims they were passed. I think we would like to know which representatives voted for them, if the laws exist. Last time I checked, governors do not make laws, legislatures do. The governors’ unlegislated proclamations or edicts have no force in law among the public. Maybe within their branch of government they do (e.g., the governors’ employees), but not to the general citizens.
