Racist Airbnb corporate antisemitism in violation of U.S. laws on boycotts

6

Airbnb advances a vicious blood libel against the Jewish state while operating in countries under brutal, racist regimes (ie Pakistan, Iran)

Airbnb says: No Jews allowed. The apartment-sharing service has sided against Israel by banning and delisting the apartments of peaceful Jewish civilians living in Judea and Samaria. And that’s not even the worst part.

Nor is the worst part that Airbnb is helping propel the destructive myth that Jews would abandon their claim to the disputed West Bank if only there were enough international pressure.

Story continues below advertisement

No, the worst part is that Airbnb has singled out Jews, and only Jews, as the one group in the world that is worthy of such censure. That’s what makes its boycott a naked act of corporate anti-Semitism.

Airbnb says an entire team “struggled to come up with the right approach.” And the right approach evidently was to bar Jews from listing the apartments and homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Airbnb is only targeting Jews — not the present government of Israel or the “Zionists” or any political entity — who live on disputed land.

Read the rest here.

Airbnb tests new U.S. laws on boycotts after dropping settlement listings

An author of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act in the Senate, Rob Portman of Ohio, a Republican, wants to hear from Airbnb, his office told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

By Michael Wilner, Jerusalem Post, November 21, 2018:

A general view shows the Jewish settlement of Kiryat Arba in Hebron, in the occupied West Bank Septe

A general view shows the Jewish settlement of Kiryat Arba in Hebron, in the occupied West Bank September 11, 2018. Picture taken September 11, 2018. (photo credit: MUSSA QAWASMA / REUTERS)

WASHINGTON – Airbnb’s move this week to delist properties located in Jewish settlements in the West Bank from its website prompted enough of an outcry in Israel to be heard in Washington, where key lawmakers are expressing concern and raising the prospect of legal action against the service giant.

The decision by Airbnb, an online marketplace for property rentals, sparked furor from Israeli officials this week. Cabinet ministers, including Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan, said they are exploring whether the San Francisco-based company had violated any US laws designed to address the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

ADVERTISING
Be the first to know – Join our Facebook page.

There are many such laws to review. Over half of US states have passed anti-BDS legislation in the past three years, which threaten to nix state government contracting and participation with companies that discriminate on the basis of national origin or place of residence.

And a bill making its way through Congress – with bipartisan support in both houses– seeks to shield Israeli businesses engaged in the West Bank by criminally penalizing US entities who participate in international boycotts.

An author of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act in the Senate, Rob Portman of Ohio, a Republican, wants to hear from Airbnb, his office told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

“We are looking into this. We have questions and concerns,” said Emily Benavides, Portman’s spokesperson. “Senator Portman has long fought highly selective and discriminatory efforts to isolate Israel.”

On the state level, sources tell the Post that the Illinois state legislature – which passed the nation’s first local anti-BDS law in 2015 – will meet in mid-December and is expected to debate whether Airbnb had violated its statute.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:

The law defines boycotting Israel as “engaging in actions that are politically motivated and are intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or otherwise limit commercial relations with the State of Israel or companies based in the State of Israel or in territories controlled by the State of Israel” – an explicit reference to those boycotting the Jewish State’s policy in the West Bank.

“If state regulators and boards of investment determine Airbnb’s action was politically motivated, Airbnb will become the most high-profile company blacklisted for boycotting Israel,” said Richard Goldberg, a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who was involved in the drafting of the Illinois law.

Airbnb says it struggled with its decision to delist its 200-odd properties previously offered in the area. But Human Rights Watch, who advocated for the move over the course of two years during private talks with the company, said that Airbnb’s discrimination against national origin was actually practiced against Palestinians, as they are unable to rent properties on the website on lands they own.

The argument provides Airbnb with a potential legal arrow in its quiver as it prepares for the potential battle with at least one or more states, and possibly with some senior members of Congress.

Their struggle will vary by state. Several legislatures did not include reference to territory “controlled” by Israel, leaving room for boycotts that are tailored to West Bank activity. But prospective federal anti-boycott legislation seems to cover this sort of activity.

It is the policy of Congress, according to the bill, to view “companies that either operate, or have business relations with entities that operate, beyond Israel’s 1949 Armistice lines, including east Jerusalem,” as amounting to “policies as actions to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel.”

Israel attained land beyond the Green Line in the 1967 War, its settlements in those areas are a subject of concern to Palestinian groups and some countries.

“We are most certainly not the experts when it comes to the historical disputes in this region. Our team has wrestled with this issue and we have struggled to come up with the right approach,” Airbnb said on Monday. “We concluded that we should remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians.”

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0349 JAT
0349 JAT
5 years ago

Boycott airbnb in the USA

Gina Randelli
Gina Randelli
5 years ago

“Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians.” Rubbish, Jew hatred is the real ‘core’ issue.

BigMG
BigMG
5 years ago

With the mass invasion into the West, there’s been a resurgence of diseases once subdued. Measles, Small Pox, Tuberculosis, and parasites.

Jews should look at this as a good thing since they now know what to avoid for their own health and safety.

The same people who want to kill them are busy killing themselves with murder, disease, and inbreeding.

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
5 years ago

Bit of news from Australia

New laws will strip Australian extremists of citizenship
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/new-laws-will-strip-australian-extremists-of-citizenship

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
5 years ago

It is very possible that Airbnb or someone on its behalf is willing to test each and every one of those BDS laws, forcing SCOTUS to decide on both 1A and to revisit Valentine v. Chrestensen (the case that established the doctrine of commercial speech). Also interesting is that Airbnb does business worldwide, including in countries without formal relations with Israel.

For the most part, I see those anti-BDS laws as unconstitutional as they are in violation of the First Amendment (as decided in NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Company, which would run up against the Chrestensen case mentioned prior). One can be pro-Israel and oppose those laws, as the USA is a country of a Constitution, with laws and popular will coming second.

Mike Kevins
Mike Kevins
5 years ago

I do not travel much, so I have never had the occasion to use smearbnb. Looks like I never will.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!