St. Louis prosecutor investigating gun-toting couple was backed by George SOROS

Try facing down 300 pavement monkeys and see what you do. You would wet your pants.

So then you would let the rioters/looters beat or kill you and rob you and rape and murder your wife and/or children rather than brandish a firearm?

Now THAT was a comment worth its weight in bitcoin, times a thousand.

The Gunnery Sergeant that kept me from getting into trouble, as a shave tail second lewey, had graduated from Carlos Hathcock’s school. I realize that optics, ammunition, and firearms have improved, but I doubt that even Sgt. Edwards would have even dreamed of taking someone out at a mile.

You don’t have to. I survived. Others did not. BTW you are now blocked.

Maybe in your state.

The problem is, like all PRETEND attorneys-at-law, you used a search engine under “brandishing”, as opposed to reviewing/reading the actual law. I have posted said statute for you, numerous times. However, as in the case of most PRETEND attorneys-at-law, you simply cannot make it through, much less understand.

You poor, poor little thing.

Be my guest. Hopefully the judge and jury will follow the law, not your legal expertice and you can have a long relationship with a man named Bubba behind bars. You see idiot, I don’t care about you at all. Hopefully others will read and follow the law. But I don’t worry about them much either.

First Mr. Handjob. It’s FD not JD. Two years of contract law at Universidy of San Francisco. Not a member of the Bat but I did legal briefs for a DA in a California County for 12 years and did successfully stve off a brandishing a weapon’s charge made against me when I fended off a home invasion and was falsely accused of brandishing a firearm, despite the fact the invaders were attempting to kill me in my own home. So, Mr. Handjob, what’s your field of legal expertice?

Right, you’re a lawyer. That’s why you use a troll name like Achmed Mohandjob.

So let’s see now
A gun collector, a fully qualified marksman too. And a sniper too.
Tough guy spec ops
In between all that you did legal briefs for a DA for 12 years and two years of contract law U.SF. But you aren’t a member of the ……..Bat?, or is it the Bar. I can see why you aren’t a lawyer.

So you “brandished” a weapon while fending off an attack at home. Sounds familiar

How about that surgical practice. How’s that going?

Am I testing your resolve……………………………………Dave?

Dave, you are insane. Paranoid? Are you confined? A shut-in? Drinking your food through a straw?

Private property is another matter. These protesters were on private property.
Gun handling was by no means the best but the protesters forced the escalation.

You weren’t there. And you aren’t a lawyer, just a Monday Morning Leftist quarterback. If they are in your house it’s generally too late.

Leftists will twist themselves into pretzels to have us disarmed.

Are you sure that you replied to the correct post?

No problem. I figured it was to the idiot with the handle “Freeland_Dave”.

They threatened to kill the couple and their dog. What don’t you get?
You want to play stupid games and test people then be prepared to win stupid prizes.
It does make a difference. Many store owners stood outside and guarded their businesses
with rifles and pistols during rioting. It seems rules only apply to certain people in your world. In a world where police may never show up , the rules may get bent and broken accordingly with the force used against them. I didn’t see that they had enough time to get a referee to make a call. No harm no foul.

Awe. So you obviously do not believe in the 1st amendment. The part about freedom of speech. And to think, you call me treasonous and a coward. Which ANTIFA group do you belong to.? Cover your face little boy, hide behind that mask. Or are you a rootin tootin gun toting cowboy gun nut on the far right with the likes of the KKK? Tell you what, being your gun and make me. Make certain your affairs are in order.

Tisk tisk tisk. My what a bold keyboard warrior you are.

Wrong! They broke an iron gate to get there and made threats. ..

First, little PRETEND attorney-at-law, NO one was shot.

Second point that needs to be raised, is that you are a PRETEND attorney-at-law. You’re entire legal experience was fetching coffee, for the lawyers, and picking up their dry cleaning.

Getting the lunch orders straight is one of its hardest jobs. And, they do carry files sometimes, if trusted, they can actually be a courier.

The uppity ones have to be constantly put in their place.

I remember one paralegal, in the few times that I actually practiced, could never get my sandwich right. Simple order, pastrami and Swiss on pumpernickel. If they’re out of pumpernickel, dark German rye.

Blithering idiot would bring back corned beef. And, some of them believe that they know the law.

I have no experience, of which I know, with actors. Other than taking Acting 101, at Iowa. Randy Alderson was the instructor. He’d have us, on the floor, being trees, or rocks, or some other such folderol. I remember when he called me out for just sitting there. I believe that we were supposed to be trees. I told him that I was still working on “my rock part”.

Interesting story about Acting 101. We were asked to do some “solo” acting bit. For mine, I brought in bricks, and haydite concrete blocks. I gave a tameshiwari demonstration. I tried to have everyone in the class just break one 24×12 one inch haydite block. I provided padding, although in my demonstration I used none. NO one could break a simple brittle piece of haydite. So, I put two of them together, placed a piece of newspaper on top, single piece, and did a head break.

From that point forward, Alderson never asked me to be a tree again.

Wimpy little bastid gave me an A for the semester.

I’ll agree with the Missouri Attorney General who said they are covered under the Castle Doctrine.

I have…and in a country of “I can indict a ham sandwich” it doesn’t surprise me they found a judge to do this.

Then read what the McCloskeys said you dumbo! They said they were threatened with death! People like you are part of the problem. Wake up.

It’s my lay opinion based on my studies on Missouri laws where the term ‘displaying a firearm illegally’ (brandishing) is defined unless you have a immenient (immediate present) threatn againist your life, someone elses life or grave bodily harm. i also learned a lot about brandishing a weapon when I was arrested fordoing just that as a non-sworn worker in my local PD for 12 years. I was entirely legal in that I was fending off a home invasion where the guy, a convicted felon, attempted to kill me inside of my home. Still, it took me 3 years and $5,000 to prove I was innocent before the court agreed and I was aquitted. I lost my job at PD during that time and almost lost the security clearances that enabeled my main job. Fortunately I had the training and presence of mind to do everything legally. Even then, it wasn’t a walk in the park. Experience is a good teacher.

Missouri has a Castle Doctrine law, moron. They can brandish whatever weapon they like. Especially if they felt threatened.

It’s Liberals like you who don’t like the idea of self defense.
When the mob finally comes for you they won’t care what political party you belong to. And you will wish you had purchased a weapon.

A gun nut idiot. Yeah, you are a liberal because you just had to go there.

And you are a gun collector, a fully qualified marksman too. And a sniper too. Of course you are. Wow. “Chuck” Mawhinney is in the house!

Could you be anymore full of s**t? Test your resolve? Gee dude, I’m scared now. I think maybe you have a $499 Ruger American with the stock scope and 50 yds is about your speed. I also think the only thing you ever served was time.

You know Dave, you are the second guy this week who has threatened to take me out at a distance of a mile. He was going to do it with his 783 Remington .380. (MSRP: $354). Not exactly high end. He would have been lucky to reach out about 700 yds with that caliber. What a dooshe.

And he spiced it up when he said he was an MMA champion too. He folded after a couple of posts because his lies didn’t add up.

So, another virtue signaling loser who feels the need to puff up his “resume.” I’ll have to add your vast “experience and credentials” to my list below. Total loser. But I have to admit, the gun/citizen’s arrest/expert marksman angle is a new one

This is an anonymous board Wavy Davy. You can say anything and there’s no way to prove it. Why is it that I run into so many millionaires, multi degree science whizzes, PhDs, real estate moguls, defense contractor research scientists and captains of industry on these boards, and they are all Democrats and liberals with nothing better to do than spend hours defending Obama and the Dems. And pining away for days gone by.

Just remember Dave the business end of your pop gun does not go in your mouth, although that’s where it should be.

Man, you hard guy special forces wannabes are a hoot! Have I “tested your resolve” yet, Dave?

I suggest you stop playing lawyer.

I can read comprehend and follow the law too. And what is allowed one day in court is not allowed the next day. It really depends on the politics of the judge. Why do you think the Left always goes judge shopping to the 9th Circus and then it gets overturned on appeal.

There are lib judges and conservative judges. That’s why the left is in such a panic over Ginsburg keeling over. The law has never been absolute. Iguess that is why Roberts can be a conservative for minute and a liberal for the next hour.