Pamela Geller Files Lawsuit Against Gov. Cuomo and De Blasio Who Support BLM Protests but Suspend First Amendment for All Others

115

Please support the work here.




Cuomo and de Blasio Embrace BLM Protests but Suspend First Amendment for All Others: Lawsuit Filed.

By AFLC, June 18, 2020:

Late yesterday, the American Freedom Law Center filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging the executive orders of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio—orders which prohibit all protests in the City except the government-approved protests of Black Lives Matter (BLM).

Story continues below advertisement

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of political activist Pamela Geller, challenges the Governor’s and Mayor’s executive orders which prohibit “non-essential gatherings” of more than 10 people in the City—orders which make it unlawful to peaceably assemble and protest, unless your protest supports the political agenda of the BLM movement.

Geller is an author, a conservative blogger, and champion for the First Amendment.  In addition to successfully challenging government restrictions on free speech in New York, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, and Seattle, she was the organizer of the successful public protest of the Ground Zero mosque construction in Lower Manhattan.

But for the Governor’s and Mayor’s suspension of the First Amendment, Geller would organize and participate in a public protest of their policies, specifically including the draconian restrictions they have imposed upon fundamental liberties during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During a press conference held on May 4, 2020, Mayor de Blasio and New York City Police Commissioner Dermot Shea publicly and officially announced that the “shut down” imposed by the executive orders included the suspension of the right to publicly protest in the City.  In other words, free speech activity was considered a “non-essential gathering” and thus prohibited by executive order.

The May 4, 2020, press conference announcement by de Blasio and Shea was prompted by a question relating to a small group of protestors (unrelated to BLM) who were instructed by New York City police to disband and who were threatened by the police with summonses and arrest if they failed to disband.

Apparently sparked by the death of George Floyd while in police custody in Minneapolis, Minnesota, beginning on May 28, 2020, and continuing daily through the current month of June 2020, hundreds and thousands of protestors have taken to the streets of New York City protesting what they allege to be police brutality against Blacks and what is referred to as systemic racism and calling for various reforms.

Notwithstanding the First Amendment restrictions in place at the time and their enforcement by the Governor and Mayor against other New Yorkers engaged in public group activity, including activity protected by the First Amendment’s right to freedom of speech and to peaceably assemble, Cuomo and de Blasio have embraced these protestors and their message and have encouraged their public demonstrations and protests.

For example, on June 1, 2020, just four days after the start of the government-approved BLM protests, Cuomo and de Blasio issued a press release stating that the BLM movement is “too important and the message must be heard,” that they “stand behind the protestors and their message,” and that they “encourage people to protest peacefully and make their voices heard.”

AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi commented:

It is astounding that Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio have so much disdain for our most fundamental liberties.  For months they have issued draconian edicts destroying our economy and stealing our freedom in the name of public health.  But when the message is politically important for their ends and for their political careers, public health evaporates into the not-so-thin, putrid air of hypocrisy.  The courts have not done well to preserve our liberties among the cries of a public health crisis by the political and media elites.  This lawsuit is an opportunity for justice to finally regain a foothold.

AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise added:

We have reached a critical point in our nation.  We are experiencing a tyranny like we have never seen before.  Left-wing government officials are acting like dictators, unilaterally suspending and modifying the Constitution to suit their personal political agenda.  If we and the courts are to accept this current state of affairs, then it is the fiat of left-wing governors and mayors, and not the Constitution, that is the supreme law of the land.  This must stop.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
115 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
3 years ago

Pamela Geller is like Xena Warrior Princess but stronger and in real life.

Keep Pamela Great

edit: Pamela Geller doesn’t need bodyguards but her bodyguards need Pamela Geller to survive. Pamela Geller is a shield

Philip
Philip
3 years ago

It’s whispered that her bodyguards have better bodyguards all focused on guarding her 24/7.

SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
3 years ago
Reply to  Philip

it sounds a bit like a conspiracy to keep Pamela in good shape. Fine. I hope the bodyguards of the bodyguards bear leashes and collars like in 50 shades of Pamela 🙂 lol

I am saying Pamela is a Domina for Muslims and obedient Democrats 🙂

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

I think it comes naturally for her. She is a strong, beautiful woman with courage.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Definite progress on Covid-19 This shows cumulating mortality in the US and Canada. When it stops cumulating, and it flattens off, the epidemic is over, because mortality has stopped. The curves are similar because mortality rates are falling off in both countries.
comment image

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Her advanced maternal age aside, she’s a floozy who was selfish enough to divorce her husband and hug a much younger man, Russell Brand. Google it if you don’t believe me. There’s a clear photo of her hugging Russell.

If they do that on camera, then imagine what happens behind closed doors.

I thought you were a “conservative.” True conservatives don’t support divorce @severedseclusiveidiom:disqus

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Go to hell.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago

Good for you. Thanks. see my post above. It’s just a Soros/Killary troll. It’s what they do.

John
John
3 years ago

Sorry, but I stated the truth.

ed
ed
3 years ago
Reply to  John

We can only imagine what you and your boyfriend do behind closed doors….

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  ed

I’m not a homosexual like you, leftist clown. Please don’t project.

ed
ed
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Ummm, sorry to have to tell you this, but this is a RIGHT-leaning site. You, little hom0sexual, are the leftist clown. Go play in traffic, TROLL……

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  ed

If you want to be treated like a right-winger, then you need to ACT like one. I don’t care what you identify as; behave like a lefty, get treated like a lefty.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Then, little one, why don’t you cease acting like a Left Wingnut Regressive? Or, are you one?

John
John
3 years ago

In what way am I acting like a leftist?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I will be more than happy to answer your question, when you get around to answering those, that I have asked of you.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Claims of being a homosexual, or accusations thereof, are nothing. If someone commits a sin that is grievous as to be a stench unto the nostrils of the Lord, that is between them and the Creator.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Are you actually Warren Wilhelm, Jr.?

John
John
3 years ago

No. Rather than resorting to ad hominem attacks, why not address the issue at hand?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

How is a question an ad hominem attack, little one?

Your exceedingly poor level of education is glaringly obvious. And, that is not an ad hominem attack. That is a statement of fact.

You poor, poor little thing. I truly pity you.

John
John
3 years ago

You asked no question. Instead, you deflected by refusing to answer why Pamela divorced her husband and hugged a younger man.

Could she have filed for a divorce because her husband got fed up with her promiscuity and so rightfully called her out on it? She also hugs her daughters’ boyfriends, another sign that she’s a phony.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

“You asked no question.”

The following is a verbatim quote from that comment. point of fact it’s the entire comment:

“Are you actually Warren Wilhelm, Jr.?”

That, little one, is a question.

It was obvious that you are poorly educated. However, I did not realize that your education was THAT limited.

It seems as if your intellect is as, if not more so, limited as your education.

John
John
3 years ago

That, little one, is a question.

That was an ad hominem attack, not an actual question. Rather than resorting to ad hominem, why not address the issues I raised?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

That WAS (special emphasis added) a question, little one. Please consult a dictionary to discover the definition of “ad hominem”, you poor little thing.

Why not answer the direct question?

John
John
3 years ago

According to Merriam-Webster, ad hominem can either refer to

a) appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect

b) marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made

By attacking my intelligence and questioning my level of education, you deflect from the issue at hand. No, I’m not Warren Wilhelm Jr. You asked that question NOT because you wanted an answer, but to attack me. Your “question” was clearly rhetorical and only served the purpose of making an ad hominem attack.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I did not “attack” your intelligence or “question” your level of education.

Rather, I made observations, based upon overwhelming evidence.

The question was not rhetorical. A simple yes or no answer was all that was required.

Why do you insist upon not answering the simple questions asked of you?

John
John
3 years ago

I’ve already said that I’m not Warren Wilhelm Jr. at least several times now. If you aren’t being purposely obtuse, you’re doing a terribly poor job of gaslighting.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I have yet to “gaslight” anyone. You finally answered the question of you being Warren Wilhelm, Jr.

You have yet to answer the questions of
1) Why are you so poorly educated?
2) Why are you a bald faced liar?

John
John
3 years ago

All you got to offer is just more ad hominem.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Nothing “ad hominem” about questions.

Why don’t you answer them?

If you do not hug your daughter(s) or your mother, do you, have you ever hugged your son?

I assume not, as I doubt that you wanted to turn him into a homosexual.

John
John
3 years ago

Sounds like you don’t know how to read. There’s nothing wrong with hugging one’s spouse or one’s immediate family members, but one should NOT hug non-spousal, non-familial members of the opposite gender.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

So, you WANT to turn your male progeny into homosexuals? That’s downright sick.

John
John
3 years ago

Straw man. Rather than putting words in my mouth, why not read my actual response?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I did. Think of this, little one. If hugging someone, of the opposite sex is sexual, then hugging ANYONE is sexual. Hugging should NOT be between ANYONE, other than between spouses. And, a male hugging a male, family member or otherwise, is sexual. Doing so perpetuates homosexuality.

I pray that you’re not one of them (homosexuals). Think about what you might be doing to your children.

John
John
3 years ago

If hugging someone, of the opposite sex is sexual, then hugging ANYONE is sexual.

Objectively false. Hugging is only sexual when it’s done between non-spousal, non-familial (of age) members of the opposite gender.

Hugging should NOT be between ANYONE, other than between spouses. And, a male hugging a male, family member or otherwise, is sexual. Doing so perpetuates homosexuality.

It should only be between spouses, yes. It can be between family members, but again, this depends on the family.

If you get aroused from hugging your family members, then that’s you. Fortunately, most of us are NOT perverted like you are. A male relative hugging another male relative is unusual, but not sexual, unless of course either you or him are homosexuals.

Don’t project your weird perversions onto me. Normal people don’t get aroused when they hug family members; they only get aroused when they hug non-familial members of the opposite gender.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Obviously, you DO get aroused hugging males. Unfortunately, homosexual perverts, such as you, are the reason that today’s population has such a large percentage of homosexuals.

When you hug a male family member, you are teaching them that it is acceptable for a male to hug a male.

You should be ashamed of yourself. Moreover, homosexual groomers, such as you, should be castrated and locked away for life.

John
John
3 years ago

Don’t project your sick perversions onto me. Your issues are your OWN responsibility, not mine. I never said that I hugged male relatives.

However, there’s nothing wrong with male relatives hugging. Only a pervert like you would see something sexual in a hug between *family members*.

By your logical, a man shouldn’t hug his aunt because he may get aroused. Only perverts get aroused from hugging family members. Like I said, seek help.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

You are nothing more than a homosexual pervert. You actually believe that “there’s nothing wrong with male relatives hugging.”

Judas, you are SICK. A foul and filthy stench unto the nostrils of the Lord.

And, now you’re promoting grooming children to have sex with older women … forcing them to hug one’s aunt. Male homosexuals. Female homosexuals.

Sick perverts, such as you, should be castrated and locked up until the end of their foul and filthy days.

John
John
3 years ago

You never hugged your grandfather growing up? If you see something sexual in a hug between family members, then you’re not only a homosexual but also a pervert.

And, now you’re promoting grooming children to have sex with older women … forcing them to hug one’s aunt. Male homosexuals. Female homosexuals.”

Your words, not mine. Don’t project YOUR issues onto me. Please seek help before God punishes you for your sinful behaviors.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

There is NO way to reason with homosexual perverts, such as you. Especially those that attempt to groom innocent young family members.

A special place in hell has your name written on it.

Again, homosexual perverts that seek to groom their own family members, such as you … there is no hope. I would tell you to repent, but you are so deeply immersed in your evil, you are a lost cause.

You, foul and filthy pervert, are blocked.

John
John
3 years ago

Good riddance. Please seek help for your perversions. Rather than projecting YOUR problems onto others, accept some responsibility and good luck.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Hugging a male makes her promiscuous? Gee, what world do you live in? You make the Amish look like secular people. You’re probably very repressed.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Yes, it does. She hugged a non-spousal, non-familial male (Russell Brand) who was significantly younger than her…old enough to be her son. She essentially committed adultery.

You do know that she divorced her last husband? She’s a floozy no matter how you put it.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Committed adultery? Hilarious! Are you award this is the 21st century. So, pretty much all women are “floozies” right?

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Why do you hate marriage so much? The period of time is irrelevant. Adultery is adultery.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Were you beaten with a bible growing up. Were you forced to repent your sins deep into the night by your angry father. You need many years of intense psychotherapy to get through it all.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

I grew up in a non-religious household and for most of my life, I was an atheist. Even then, I still lived with good morals.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

A father had nothing to do with John’s condition. It was his mother that turned him into a homosexual.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Sorry, little one, but your poor education is, once again, glaringly obvious.

Someone, in the instance that you relay, would not be “old enough” to be someone’s son. In this instance, to be correct, and not display an exceedingly poor intellect, it should read, “young enough to be …”

Your poorly educated, with an exceedingly limited intellect, no matter how you put it.

John
John
3 years ago

Actually, it can be written either way. Russell Brand may be young enough to be her son, but he’s also old enough to be her son.

Your poorly educated, with an exceedingly limited intellect, no matter how you put it.

This coming from the guy who doesn’t know the difference between your and you’re. The correct form in the above blockquote would be the latter.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I left our an apostrophe. For that, I stand corrected.

Since we’re on the subject of punctuation and word usage, “This coming from the guy who doesn’t …” “This” should be followed by a comma (“,”).

Little one, you, being poorly educated, is glaringly obvious.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Yes, it does. She hugged a non-spousal, non-familial male (Russell Brand) who was significantly younger than her…old enough to be her son. She essentially committed adultery.

You do know that she divorced her last husband? She’s a floozy no matter how you put it.

John
John
3 years ago

And explain to me why Geller chose to have kids so late in life.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I have no idea, regarding that, little one. Why did you choose to be so poorly educated?

John
John
3 years ago

What does education have to do with pointing out the immorality of another? Moreover, why do you assume that I am “poorly educated”?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

What does you, being poorly educated, have to do with pointing out the immorality of another? Nothing.

You asked why someone had children late in life. I attempted to explain that it was a personal choice, such as YOU (special emphasis added) chose to not pursue your education beyond third grade, primary school, level.

Why do I assume? With the greatest of assurance I KNOW that you are very poorly educated. Even the most casual reader, of any of your comments, KNOWS that plain and simple fact.’.

John
John
3 years ago

I attempted to explain that it was a personal choice, such as YOU (special emphasis added) chose to not pursue your education beyond third grade, primary school, level.

Choosing to partake in drugs is also a personal choice, but that doesn’t make it commendable.

Why do I assume? With the greatest of assurance I KNOW that you are very poorly educated. Even the most casual reader, of any of your comments, KNOWS that plain and simple fact.’.

Yawn. More ad hominem. You fail to address the issue at hand. I ask again, why do you support Pamela despite her despicable lifestyle?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Why do you continue too attempt to construct a paragraph, when you are far too poorly educated to do so?

That, little one, is not an ad hominem. Rather, it is a simple question.

Why do you avoid answering?

John
John
3 years ago

Already answered. No, I’m not the mayor of NYC. Now answer my question(s).

Why do you support Pamela despite her promiscuity?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

I have not supported Ms. Geller. I assume that she already has enough that do so.

So, why are you asking questions that intimate an answer? That’s a very common practice of Left Wingnut Regressive bald faced liars.

Now, the question that you have yet to answer, why are you so poorly educated?

And, I’ll add another. Why are you such a liar?

Please answer those two simple questions.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

WTF? What is your obsession with Pamela’s choice on having kids. You’ve got serious problems. Are you that guy that preaches on the street corner with a bullhorn, screaming at people, etc.? Do you walk around in a priest costume so you can sanctimoniously shame people.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

It’s extremely immoral to bear children past thirty. I don’t have issues…only you do. No, I’m not a preacher, however, I try to do my best to educate you tools. It’s a civil service which I perform with my time.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

“It’s extremely immoral to bear children past thirty.” Oh, by you’re Islamic standards. Simply. Hilarious! If you were a man of God as you claim, you wouldn’t be calling people “tools.” So, disingenuous. The only service you should be performing, is on the orderlies at the institution for extra keyboard time. Cheers!

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

No, it’s immoral to bear kids past the age of thirty because it increases the likelihood of autism and Down Syndrome. It’s not about the woman…it’s about her child.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

And how does millions of normal children born to women past thirty jibe with your manifesto. Better rethink that one, sport!

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

That is untrue. Notice how the percentage of children born with Down Syndrome and autism began to increase as parents (especially mothers) began to have kids later in life.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Wow…you must be a Saint….only saints can Judge others….

However, I think you’re more like one of those Muslim paid trolls that were hired back in 2016 when Killary and Soros paid out 2 million to hire 800 of you….you’re probably sitting up their in Canada like many of them…..and, what a dirty, dirty mind you have…..BLOCKED.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  ladywarrior

I’m not a Muslim, biddy. You’re nothing other than a floozy grasping at straws in a poor attempt to excuse your own promiscuity and immorality.

Divorce is selfish. If one is in a relationship, then one shouldn’t hug other (especially) younger men.

Before you block me once again, I want you to answer the question. WHY was Pamela hugging Russell Brand? Why is she such a floozy? Why did she divorce her husband?

You can’t answer those questions because you’re a coward. No wonder you moved to Vegas…probably to sleep around with toy boys.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  John

“before you block me again”?
Only paid trolls have numerous avatars….tell your master Soros that he’s paying a really stupid troll…see you in the next avatar….Blocked and reported.

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Why are you so poorly educated? Why do you have such a limited intellect? Why are you a bald faced liar?

You cannot answer those questions because you’re a coward.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

No, you jackass. Everyone knows you move to Vegas because you can get a steak dinner with all the fixins’ for $11.95.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

…I would like to build a statue of her…but then the commie dems would just tear it down.
I have been very distressed over seeing statues tore down everywhere….our history erased….Saul Alinsky “RULES FOR RADICALS.” The Commie professors teach it at the universities that we all pay to “educate” our kids.
How dumb are we…..

Adrian Maclean
Adrian Maclean
3 years ago
Reply to  ladywarrior

Pretty dumb; time to smarten up.

John
John
3 years ago

Pamela Geller is nothing other than a promiscuous femi-nazi. She was selfish enough to divorce and have kids past the age of 33 — youngest at 33 and oldest at 39. She even had the audacity to HUG a much younger man. http://www.islamophobiatoday.com/2012/12/10/pamela-geller-discovers-that-russell-brand-is-a-jihadist/

People like her meet their fate in the afterlife. God does not like such behavior, regardless of religion.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Gee “John” your name wouldn’t happen to be Abdullah would it?
Degenerate Russell Brand was hugging her not vice-versa.
As for islamophobia allahtard? It’s “a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.” And I’ll bet you’re a perfect hat trick…

Patriotic American
Patriotic American
3 years ago

Besides, Brand has been a jihad sympathizer.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago

I didn’t know that, I thought he was of Hindu ancestry so that’s kinda disgusting…

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago

See my post above….and I blocked the troll….:0)

John
John
3 years ago

If she truly is a woman of morals, then why did she consent to the hug in the first place?

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Dont write anymore comments on here. You need emergency psychotherapy.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Forgive me for calling out promiscuity and insincerity whenever I see it, but I’m not the Devil. I don’t just ignore blatant displays of moral depravity.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

You claim not to be the devil, but sure seem to delight in your self-righteousness.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

If you say so. I have no desire to force my ideology upon you, but I will pray for you.

Adrian Maclean
Adrian Maclean
3 years ago
Reply to  John

Oh ! So you and God are buddies. Nah ! God wouldn`t want you as a buddy.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  Adrian Maclean

I have morals, unlike you.

Adrian Maclean
Adrian Maclean
3 years ago
Reply to  John

You are a bigot of the first order ! HAYA !!!

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  Adrian Maclean

I’m not a bigot. There is simply no reason for why she divorced her husband and HUGGED Russell Brand. She’s a floozy, much like your mother.

Adrian Maclean
Adrian Maclean
3 years ago
Reply to  John

My mother is a Saint and dwells in the House of the Lord . Judge ye not, lest ye be judged. HAYA !!

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  Adrian Maclean

I’m not a bigot. There is simply no reason for why she divorced her husband and HUGGED Russell Brand. She’s a floozy, much like your mother.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

You are OBSESSED with Pamela allegedly ‘hugging a younger man.’ And, her having kids later in life. WOW! If you are a male and straight, have you ever even talked to a woman? And dont count the latex ones in your basement!

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

God rewards those who resist their urges. Yes, I’m a straight healthy male, but that doesn’t mean I act on every impulse. I have never hugged, flirted, or befriended opposite-gender, non-spousal individuals.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

“I have never hugged, flirted, or befriended opposite-gender, non-spousal individuals.” Do you shake hands with your mom, when you greet her.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Let me rephrase it:

One should not hug, flirt, or befriend opposite-gender, non-spousal, non-familial individuals.

So I suppose giving a quick hug to your mother or grandmother is okay, but nothing more than that.

And no, I don’t shake hands with any of my family members, male or female. There’s nothing wrong with shaking hands with family members or with people who are of the same gender as you, but I’m not a hand-shaker.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago
Reply to  John

“Quick hug to your mother or grandmother…..” Gee, it would make sense if no one in your family wanted you around for the holidays. What a kill joy you must be to have around. You need to explore the reason(s) for your fear of the opposite sex. You’ve got some serious issues. The question is, why do you insist on making them public.

John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

In what way does celibacy equate to “fear”?

Achmed Mohandjob
Achmed Mohandjob
3 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Hello, santashelper. You’ll find many homosexuals that are that way. Rather commonplace.

santashandler
santashandler
3 years ago

Good point, Mohandjob!

John
John
3 years ago

Pamela Geller is nothing other than a promiscuous femi-nazi. She was selfish enough to divorce and have kids past the age of 33 — youngest at 33 and oldest at 39. She even had the audacity to HUG a much younger man. http://www.islamophobiatoday.com/2012/12/10/pamela-geller-discovers-that-russell-brand-is-a-jihadist/

People like her meet their fate in the afterlife. God does not like such behavior, regardless of religion.

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
3 years ago

Gov cuomo needs to be sued by the family members of a those he murdered in the nursing homes via ccp covid19!

SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
SeveredSeclusiveIdiom
3 years ago
Reply to  Thomas Faddis

you can say cocovid for communist coronavirus disease
edit: I used to watch a webserie on CommieYouTube called Cocovoit (in French) https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHVxCo7tMNY6OrjVnJct–A/videos

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
3 years ago

Let’s get that trending! Thx!

Glen Benjamin
Glen Benjamin
3 years ago
Reply to  Thomas Faddis

Cuomo is a scumbag. He now refuses to comply with congressional requests fir data regarding nursing home deaths. Cuomo thinks he us king and blaming Trump, the NY Post and conservatives fir even asking fir the information.

StevenRobert
StevenRobert
3 years ago
Reply to  Thomas Faddis

I’m not sure the case has merit, not being a lawyer.

The nursing homes might have a case that they were forced to endanger residents by the governor’s orders.

It will be very hard to get a New York judge to accept such a case in their court, since the judiciary has become politicized.

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
3 years ago
Reply to  StevenRobert

Yeah, I was being hyperbolic….the Old definition, lol!

Underzog
Underzog
3 years ago

Joanne of Arc (Jeanne d’arc, fighting for America.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

This is the best news I have seen all day!

Thank you Ms, Geller!!!!!!!

comment image?fit=400%2C288&ssl=1

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

You truly made my day!
Thank you again and again and again!
What’s going on is maddening.

comment image

Andrew
Andrew
3 years ago

P Geller is alone in her fight for the Bill of Rights. NYPD not so much as long as they get paid by Cuomo and DeBozo.

Geller Fan
Geller Fan
3 years ago

GREAT on ya, Pammy !!!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago

Those in politics and the media who see fit to squelch the First Amendment rights of others need to be reminded that those constitutional liberties that allow political discourse are the very same guarantees that allow political debate and a free media to even exist in the first place.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago

….and if that is infringed……we’ve got the good ol’ 2nd Amendment…..our Founding Fathers were freaking AWESOME!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
3 years ago
Reply to  ladywarrior

The Second Amendment protects all the others.

ladywarrior
ladywarrior
3 years ago

YOU, GO, GIRL!
What a freedom fighter Pamela is…..if not for her stopping the Mosque being built on the site of 9/11…Manhattan would be hearing the “call to pray” blasting over the city 5 times a day.
Anywhere Muslims have a “conquest” over a people or country….they build a Mosque on top of it….sort of like a dog marking their territory with their “scent.”

fedup666
fedup666
3 years ago

Fredo was HUD secretary, He pushed government-sponsored lenders (Mae and Mac) to buy more home loans
issued to poor homeowners, in an attempt to end discrimination against minorities. 2007-2010, we had the subprime mortgage crisis. Remember Clinton’s administration with the help of Greenspan, relaxed the banking rules.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
3 years ago

God bless Pamela, David Yerushalmi, and the AFLC staff …

… Don’t forget …

… Paint MAGA #2020 painted on East End and 88th St. …

That’ll be just about right.

*** Everyone at Geller have a wonderful week!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!