Where Is the Real Al-Aqsa Mosque?

21

As is well known, the Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik, based in Damascus, planted his flag on the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism and the site from where, he wanted Muslims to believe, Muhammad had ascended to Heaven on his winged steed Buraq, in his famous Night Journey. Abd al-Malik built what he called the “Al-Aqsa Mosque,” meaning that this was the “farthest mosque” (al-masjid al-aqsa) referred to in Qur’an 17:1, from which Muhammad took flight on Buraq. Not everyone agrees. A Saudi lawyer and journalist has just offered what he believes is the site of the real Al-Aqsa Mosque; a report on his claim is here.

Al-Aqsa Mosque, the third-holiest site in Islam, is not located on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, Saudi lawyer and journalist Osama Yamani is claiming.

In an article in the Saudi news outlet Okaz, Yamani claims that the mosque is actually located in Al Ju’ranah, near Mecca in Saudi Arabia.

Story continues below advertisement

Yamani writes that the confusion between the two sites stems from the fact that many history books state that Al-Aqsa is located in Jerusalem.

“Jerusalem is not Al-Aqsa, which is not cited in the missions that Allah gave Muhammad and the caliphs. Similarly, Jerusalem is a city, and Al-Aqsa is a mosque,” he states.

Jerusalem, as Osama Yamani notes, is not mentioned by Allah in his command for Muhammad to go on his Night Journey. He is told only to go to the “farthest mosque” – al-masjid al-aqsa – but the city is not specified. In fact Jerusalem is not mentioned even once in the Qur’an. Muhammad made his Night Journey, according to Muslim sources, around 621 A.D.; he died in 632 A.D. It would have been impossible for him to visit the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem; that mosque wasn’t finally completed until 715 A.D., some 94 years after his Night Journey and 73 years after his death.

Jerusalem was selected to be the site of the “farthest mosque” because the Umayyad Caliph in Damascus, Abd al-Malik, wanted to appropriate for Islam, and for his own power and glory, the Temple Mount. He was at the time engaged in war with Byzantium and its Syrian Christian allies on the one hand, and with the rival caliph Ibn al-Zubayr, who controlled Mecca, on the other. Scholars suggest that by building these two structures on top of the Temple Mount – the Dome of the Rock, between 685 and 691, and Al-Aqsa Mosque, which he began in about 695 (some sources claim It was completed in 705, but others say it was not fully completed until 715, by his son al-Walid I), Abd al-Malik was laying claim to a site that had once been important in Christianity, remained the holiest site in Judaism and, he hoped, might for Muslims become a kind of lesser Mecca, which his enemy Ibn al-Zubayr controlled. It was not Muslim texts that placed Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, but the geopolitical considerations of Umayyad Caliph Abd al-Malik.

Yamani adds that originally, Muslims did not face in the direction of Al-Aqsa while praying.

Muslims in Arabia first prayed in the direction north-northwest, which was taken to mean that the qibla was Jerusalem. Some scholars, such as Len Gibson, believe that there was another city lying in the same north-northwest direction from Mecca and Medina, that was the first qibla: the ancient Nabataean capital of Petra. The controversy over Petra as the first qibla remains. And now Osama Yamani suggests another site, also in a north-northwest direction from Mecca and Medina, Al Ju’ranah, which is near Mecca.

Yamani backs up his argument with historic facts, such as the fifth caliph from the Umayyad dynasty, Abd al-Malik, building the Dome of the Rock in the year 691 CE. Al-Malik built the dome nine years after Abd Allah Ibn al-Zubayr rebelled and prevented local residents from fulfilling the obligation to make the haj pilgrimage to Mecca.

If local residents in Abd al-Malik’s domain, including Damascus and Jerusalem, were prevented by his political rival Ibn al-Zubayr from making the hajj to Mecca, then Abd al-Malik would make Jerusalem into an alternative site for Muslims to visit, by building two important edifices: the Dome of the Rock, and the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The latter would be identified as the “farthest mosque” that Muhammad visited before ascending into Heaven on his Night Journey, without anyone having the bad taste to point out that when Abd al-Malik began building that “farthest mosque,” Muhammad had been dead for 64 years.

“At that stage, he changed the direction of prayer toward Jerusalem,” Yamani says, referring to al-Malik.

Yamani explains that “There are stories influenced by political considerations that served purposes of that time, and sometimes claims are made that they have nothing to do with faith or following religious dictates.”

According to Yamani, then, the real “farthest mosque” was in Al-Ju’ranah, close to Mecca, which unlike Jerusalem, apparently had a mosque during Muhammad’s lifetime. As a matter of political self-aggrandizement, Abd al-Malik built the Dome of the Rock, and the mosque he called “Al-Aqsa” (that was completed by his son Walid I), to endow Jerusalem with religious significance for Muslims and at the same time, to appropriate the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism, for Islam.

Why should we care about what some may see as quibbles over qiblas? If enough Muslims were to become convinced that Jerusalem is not where the real Al-Aqsa Mosque was located – which means they would be willing to recognize the embarrassing fact that during Muhammad’s lifetime, and for more than three-quarters of a century after his death, there was no mosque on Temple Mount nor anywhere else in Jerusalem – the effects could be startling, and salutary.

If Jerusalem were reduced in its religious significance for Muslims, this could – one hopes — lessen the level of fury among Believers at Israel’s possession of the city. What would it take to convince Muslims of this version of history? They already know that Muhammad died long before he could have visited a mosque in Jerusalem, but simply suppress that thought and what it signifies. Now the archeological evidence for locating the “farthest mosque” elsewhere needs to be presented by Osama Yamani. If there are ruins of a mosque in al-Ju’ranah, is there any way to date them (carbon dating only works if the material was once part of a living organism)? Is there any evidence that al-Ju’ranah was in the 7th century a place of some significance? Is it mentioned, for example, anywhere in the Hadith, possibly even as a place that Muhammad might have visited? It’s not enough to point out that the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem could not have been, given when it was built and despite what is called, the Al-Aqsa Mosque that existed in Muhammad’s lifetime. One must build the case for alternative sites. We need to know much more from Yamani about al-Ju’ranah, and whether, at the time of the Night Journey in 621, the mosque in that settlement was indeed farther from Mecca, where Muhammad was then living, than any other.

Were Jerusalem, as a result of this research on the real site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, to diminish in religious significance for a considerable number of Muslims, that would be one way to possibly lessen tensions with Israel. It won’t affect the Palestinians, whose hysteria and rage are not susceptible to appeals to history and common sense. For them, Israel would still be an enemy, holding onto “Palestinian” land. But the extreme passion that other Muslims now feel because Jerusalem is in Israeli hands might be reduced, especially as several Arab states clearly want to improve their relations with the Jewish state.

If Al-Aqsa has been misplaced on Temple Mount, so, too, has the Dome of the Rock, for that is supposed to cover the “rock” that marks the very spot from which Muhammad, on Buraq, ascended into Heaven. If the “farthest mosque” is elsewhere – say, at al-Ju’ranah — then so must be the “rock,” which necessarily would be next to that “farthest mosque.”

And there is one other geopolitical consideration. Saudi Arabia has an obvious interest in researching and promoting this claim by Saudi lawyer Osama Yamani. If the “farthest mosque” Is determined by researchers to be within Saudi Arabia, this would give the country the three most important sites in Islam: Mecca, Medina, and now, Al-Ju’ranah. What Saudi would not be delighted with that result? And how many billions of dollars might Riyadh spend to sponsor conferences, publish books, subsidize sermons and broadcasts, all over the Muslim world, in support of a Saudi site for “the farthest mosque”? And the U.A.E. and Bahrain, the Saudis’ closest Arab allies, that have their own obvious reasons for wanting to tamp down anti-Israel passions now that their normalization of relations with the Jewish state is in full spate, should also welcome a finding that the “Mosque Formerly Known As Al-Aqsa” in Jerusalem, however impressive as a feat of architecture, is without religious significance.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
knightsstrength
knightsstrength
3 years ago

Petition to declare that an insurrection exists to overthrow the will of we the people and to utilize military tribunals
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/petition-declare-insurrection-exists-overthrow-will-we-people-and-utilize-military-tribunals
b

2thegates
2thegates
3 years ago

John Brennan is probably seething over this report!

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  2thegates

It won’t be the first time!
comment image

2thegates
2thegates
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

A commie Muslim. The perfect example of the “Unholy Alliance.”

AlgorithmicAnalyst
AlgorithmicAnalyst
3 years ago

Thanks, interesting history and political analysis.

Clearly101
Clearly101
3 years ago

oop…this dude will promptly have a Fatwa on his head.

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Regardless of the site, it never happened for this fake prophet. Islam copied this idea from the Old Testament. They are so dumb, they can’t even get their lies straight. You will not find Jerusalem mentioned anywhere in the Quran. It means nothing to them It’s all made up and based on stolen parts of the New and Old Testament.

Mohammad was an illiterate gigolo looking for attention. As a trader/merchant for his wealthy wife, in his travels, he heard about Judaism and Christianity. It impressed him so he created Islam and borrowed from both. He hoped his fake religion would replace Judaism and Christianity. It didn’t.

comment image

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Jay Smith and Robert Spencer have had an interesting set of discussions on youtube discussing whether or not the “prophet” muhammad existed at all. Robert Spencer has written an entire book on the subject. Robert Spencer seems to advance the idea that neither muhammad “the prophet” nor the rightly guided caliphs even existed.

Mike Kevins
Mike Kevins
3 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Exactly!

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
3 years ago

Fake myth from a fake religion.

ed
ed
3 years ago

Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu) will be upset and call this report “pisslam-o-faux-bia”….

leonore35
leonore35
3 years ago

Not only is the claim of Islam to the Temple Mount quite spurious does nobody see how colonialist the claim is?
Not to mention as the article states, cultural appropriation
Yet the Muslims and their fellow travelers claim the Jews are the colonisers

Bikinis not Burkas
Bikinis not Burkas
3 years ago

They also suppress the fact written in their sacred books that Muhammad was WHITE and a red head, seen the Pakistani men that have dyed their beards ginger to look like the scum bag.

Schiff has Bette Davis Eyes
Schiff has Bette Davis Eyes
3 years ago

You’ve said nothing new…I know a few sikhs suffered from mistaken identity after 9/11.. I can tell the difference and honestly even Sikhs would not mind seeing Muslims get what they deserved especially since their daughters also are targeted for rape buy Muslims, but so what it’s nothing compared to what they have done across the planet and the media covering for them for the last 20 years. Unfortunately I’ll never be in power because if I was I kick most of them out and destroy the ones who are known terrorists. They have no mercy on us and out families, it’s time they get it back three fold.
The left ignores the Christians killed by Muslims in Africa and Middle East.. They ignore race based slavery from Arabs towards black Africans…Feminists ignore the atrocities committed against women in mostly Muslim countries. And of course it is mostly the left who feel mansplaining and man spreading are more important than women getting raped, and unless they have four male witnesses she’s executed for fornication..But wha about mansplaining you say?..Bitch Stfu..Also look up the Royhinga hoax..You can download it for free online..That book tells what many already know..That peaceful Buddhists are not the ones harassing, murdering and raping Muslims. Information the media once again deliberately spreads and millions believe cause of their deceitful spins and Omissions..But the fact is it’s yet another case of Muslims trying to dominate, rape, murder, and convert by force other cultures religions or races, and their victims are always the ones being blamed for it..Something they’ve gone for over 1400 years. The media will pa for what they do.

Murielle
Murielle
3 years ago

I doubt this will make much difference, even if every muslim in the world embraced it as divine truth, because once a muslim sets foot on a land the land entire is claimed for their god.
Still, it is gratifying to know that they absolutely have no claim to Jerusalem.

Maranatha
Maranatha
3 years ago

Even the Quran says the Land belongs to Israel:
”….because the Land that We (Allah)….gave to Mosses after We (Allah) defeated the Pharaoh….will belong to Israel even to the last day when Israel will be gathered from all nations”
Surah 17:100-104
Quran..

Dorrie_
Dorrie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Maranatha

One real problem is that there is no “Allah.” Unless it’s the name of one of Satan’s minions in hell. GOD HIMSELF defeated Pharaoh, and all Jews and those grafted in to the Olive Tree (i.e. believers in Yeshua the Messiah who keep His Feasts & Sabbaths) know and understand that.

Dorrie_
Dorrie_
3 years ago
Reply to  Maranatha

Moses … or Moshe

kgolfinghawaii
kgolfinghawaii
3 years ago

One day I believe that rock will be destroyed along with that monstrosity on the Temple mount. This leads one to think it could happen with less bloodshed.

Mike Kevins
Mike Kevins
3 years ago

As is typical the muslim’s beliefs are based on lies and inaccuracies. If you point this out, you will be beheaded with a chorus of “allahu akbar” being screamed in the background. These people need to be educated instead of indoctrinated and then, maybe there could be peace.

MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
3 years ago

The real Al Aqsa mosque is a urinal located on the second floor of the Tijuana bus station. Muhammad flew his donkey with the woman face to Tijuana once because he had a hankering for some street vendor fish tacos.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!