ELECTION FRAUD: Supreme Court Alito’s Ruling Last Night Has ALTOGETHER DIFFERENT MEANING In Light of NEW EMERGENCY FILING

14

Last night I reported on a SCOTUS ruling: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. Gives State Officials Until Dec. 9 To File Response, General Assembly’s Republican Leadership “have No Intention of Doing So”

I wrote that before another Emergency Application, substantially similar, was filed yesterday, December 3.

Preeminent legal mind William Jacobson explains what Alito’s ruling actually means

Story continues below advertisement

Pennsylvania – Don’t Assume Alito Giving Until 12/9 To Respond To Emergency Application Means He’s Letting It Die On the Vine

By: William Jacobson, December 4, 2020:

On December 1, 2020, we covered an emergency application for injunctive relief sought to halt any further actions by Pennsylvania to certify the election, Pennsylvania: Emergency Injunction Sought From SCOTUS To Halt Any Further Certification Actions.

See that post for background on the case, and my admittedly pessimistic assessment.

Another Emergency Application, substantially similar, was filed yesterday, December 3. That made no sense to me, why would they file twice?

I spoke to an attorney handling the case, and the explanation is that the first filing took place prior to a stay being sought from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which issued the decision at issue. Out of concern that the US Supreme Court might deny the stay on the procedural ground that a request had not been made to the state court, the attorneys waited for the PA Supreme Court predictably to deny the stay, and then refiled on December 3.

According to the Supreme Court docket, Justice Alito, who covers the Third Circuit, gave Pennsylvania and the other Respondents until next Wednesday to file responses.

Response to application (20A98) requested by Justice Alito, due Wednesday, December 9, by 4 p.m.

There is a lot of chatter that such a long period of time, under the circumstances, must be a way for Alito to let the application die on the vine, that the application would be “moot” or otherwise pushing it off to make meaningful relief impossible. Certainly, we can’t read Alito’s mind, but if there’s anyone on SCOTUS I don’t worry about playing such games, it’s Alito (and Thomas, too early to tell for Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barrett).

In my mind-reading exercise, Alito giving the respondents’ enough time to fully prepare opposition likely means he and some other Justices take the matter seriously, and plan to rule on the merits once the opposition is submitted, rather than limiting their ruling to emergency injunctive relief. They could treat the Emergency Application as a Petition for Certiorari, accept it, and rule substantively. The few days gives the Justice enough time to prepare their respective opinions — it’s not like they really need briefs from the respondents to know the counter-arguments.

What that ultimate merits ruling would be remains to be seen. In my prior post, I was very pessimistic that SCOTUS would take the case or rule in a way that would change the state result. That’s not to say that what the PA Supreme Court did was right — it wasn’t and that PA Court has acted more like a litigant throughout this process. Mark Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation has filed an Amicus Brief laying out the defects with the PA Supreme Court ruling.

The issue I keep coming back to is what is the remedy. SCOTUS could rule that the non-absentee mail-in votes were unlawful, and order that PA certify the vote and appoint electors based on the lawful vote only. That seems to be the only remedy to grant relief that works under the timeline for selecting the electoral college. (Denying the Application of course also is a possiblity.) Kicking the matter over the the PA legislature to select electors could be an alternative though less timely, but again, it would require disqualifying the mail-in vote as unlawful.

Would SCOTUS take such a step? It would mean that millions of voters who honestly thought they were lawfully voting would not have their votes counted. Don’t think for a second that the Justices don’t understand the political implications or are not sensitive to them.

Editor’s note: Yes, but, if they don’t, it would mean over half of the American people will be disenfranchised because their vote didn’t count.

I think we’ll find out one way or the other, but I don’t think Justice Alito is playing games to allow the case to die on the vine.

 

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
zke007
zke007
3 years ago

English please ?

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago
Reply to  zke007

Rather than getting choked in the weeds, and not a lawyer,
just understand it is not over!

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
3 years ago

Word games while Democrats commit Insurrection, Sedition and Treason!

These black robed pricks would read a jar of olives while the Titanic sinks!

felix1999
felix1999
3 years ago

Thank you!

I too was pessimistic and feeling very deflated when I read your posting. This is a relief!

Certainly, we can’t read Alito’s mind, but if there’s anyone on SCOTUS I don’t worry about playing such games, it’s Alito (and Thomas, too early to tell for Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barrett).

AGREE!

Amathius
Amathius
3 years ago

The political implications ?

The political implications for the SCOTUS r/t Rigged Banana Republic elections – are that the SCOTUS will be stacked with 10 – 20 new justices by Democrats immediately.

The political implications for Rigged Banana Republic elections are that the elections are a total fraud and voting is completely useless. In Venezuela Banana Republic elections resulted in people being hunted whenever they left a city – like animals – they would just disappear and never come back. Trucks were unable to haul goods anywhere due to ambushes and political assasinations , bombings , killsquad ambushes etc. skyrocketed in direct response to rigged elections.

The political implications for Rigged Banana Republic elections are that you no longer have a country – you get war instead.

Those who believe they can insulate themselves from the consequences of Banana Republic elections – while living in a Banana Republic – are delusional , per all of modern history.

StevenRobert
StevenRobert
3 years ago
Reply to  Amathius

Don’t expect anything from SCOTUS.
They’re fine with packed court.
Roberts couldn’t be happier.

Jack Holan
Jack Holan
3 years ago

I will be earth shaking. We will see.

Martha Parisi
Martha Parisi
3 years ago

I heard that a/some PA legislatures r suing the Governor! Let’s hope that those in the silent majority that still lay silent will open their mouths finally and fight. The demoRATS are arrogant enough to put their puppet in a transition situation. They r in solidarity and in hyper attack mode…….. so y the hell aren’t WE??????

PS Ms. Geller, please add a “Parler” share-button so we can post ur articles on Parler (many ppl have joined and are defecting from Twitt Dorsey’s platform. Once the election is called in favor of the rightful winner, Donald J. Trump, I will be closing my account there too) Thanks!

Martha Parisi
Martha Parisi
3 years ago

I heard that a/some PA legislatures r suing the Governor! Let’s hope that those in the silent majority that still lay silent will open their mouths finally and fight. The demoRATS are arrogant enough to put their puppet in a transition situation. They r in solidarity and in hyper attack mode…….. so y the hell aren’t WE??????

PS Ms. Geller, please add a “Parler” share-button so we can post ur articles on Parler (many ppl have joined and are defecting from Twitt Dorsey’s platform. Once the election is called in favor of the rightful winner, Donald J. Trump, I will be closing my account there too) Thanks!

volksnut
volksnut
3 years ago

Time will tell – with an abundance of evidence of fraud on an unimaginable scale –

RetiredNavyphotog
RetiredNavyphotog
3 years ago

Pennsylvania is corrupt…the granny killing governor, the confused secretary of health and the super corrupt sec. of state.

ed de fonzo
ed de fonzo
3 years ago

thank the lord i live there no more

Eddie

brian crawford
brian crawford
3 years ago

It doesnt matter the out come, its still gonna end up in the streets…

CodeRed50
CodeRed50
3 years ago

I agree with another individual that already posted. Please have a MeWe link or Parlor link so we can share your articles. There are well over 7 million people that switched over by the second week of November and most of us have learned that Facebook, Twitter, Google/UTube are far left owned businesses that want nothing more than to silence conservatives. We are looking for outlets that appreciate our Constitution and our rights to free speech without being censured all the time. Facebook never used to censure anyone unless someone committed suicide live, or people complained about horrible post and they may have taken something down due to how gross it was. But now they are just flat out letting conservatives know that we are not wanted and they prefer to delete us completely so they can have all the power with nobody keeping them in check. With the voluminous amount of evidence that piles up on a daily basis since the election, I believe Congress calling all of our witnesses’ testimony “lies” makes me so sick! Sorry, but just because you refuse to accept it, does not make it a lie. Have the poll workers and people providing those affidavits take lie detector tests! Problem solved. Once that proves to whom is telling the truth, then move forward to casting out all votes counted when conservatives were unable to view and/or watch. If you do that, Trump wins in a landslide!!!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!