[ April 24, 2024 ]
Not so strangely this video is hard to find. But you must watch it, share it, email it. And come to my talk on August 15th in NYC, it’s time to war council.
The exchange between Senator Ted Cruz and Google expert Dr. Robert Epstein should shake every American. The Left will not be able to defeat Trump on the issues, so they will surely cheat. And big-tech giants make cheating easy through censorship and search engine manipulation. In the case of Google, bias search results and bias search suggestions would be incredibly damaging to President Trump in 2020.
Dr. Epstein believes that this tactic provided Hilary Clinton with “between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes” which is a huge number. However, Epstein believes that this number could reach 15 million in 2020.
Story continues below advertisement
President Trump must address big-tech cheating before the 2020 presidential election.
Read Professor Epstein’s explains how Congress can immediately end Google’s worldwide monopoly on search here:
Professor Robert Epstein told Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) that Google is manipulating voters “on a massive scale,” using tools that it has at its disposal exclusively, and that “no one can counteract them.” Epstein warned the Senator of big tech election meddling that he called “invisible,” “subliminal,” and more powerful than anything he’s seen in 40 years of behavioral sciences.
Epstein — who said that he personally supported and voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 — testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, where he told Sen. Cruz that Google election meddling gave Hillary Clinton at least 2.6 million additional votes in the 2016 election and said that figure is even way too low.
“The 2.6 million is a rock bottom minimum,” said Epstein, “The range is between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes, depending on how aggressively they use the techniques that I’ve been studying now for six and a half years — such as the search engine manipulation effect, the search suggestion effect, the answer bot effect, and a number of others.”
“They control these and no one can counteract them,” added the professor, “These are not competitive, these are tools that they have at their disposal exclusively.”
“I believe in democracy, I believe in a free and fair election more than I have any kind of allegiance to a candidate or a party,” affirmed Epstein on Tuesday. “In 2020 — if all these companies are supporting the same candidate — there are 15 million votes on the line that can be shifted without people’s knowledge, and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.”
Epstein elaborated on his assertion by describing an example involving Facebook.
If [in 2016] Mark Zuckerberg, for example, had chosen to send out a ‘Go Vote’ reminder, say, just to Democrats — and no one would have known if he had done this — that would have given that day an additional — at least 450,000 votes to Democrats, and we know this without doubt, because of Facebook’s own published data — they did an experiment that they can tell anyone about during the 2010 election — they published it in 2012, it had 60 million Facebook users involved.
They sent out a ‘Go Vote’ reminder, and they got something like 360,000 more people to get off their sofas and go vote, who otherwise would have stayed home. The point is, I don’t think that Mr. Zuckerberg sent out that reminder in 2016, I think he was overconfident, I think Google was overconfident, all these companies were. I don’t think he sent that out — without monitoring systems in place, we’ll never know what these companies are doing — but the point is, in 2018, I’m sure they were more aggressive, we have lots of data to support that.
“And in 2020, you can bet that all of these companies are going to go all out,” continued Epstein, “And the methods that they’re using are invisible, they’re subliminal, they’re more powerful than most — any effects I’ve ever seen in the behavioral sciences, and I’ve been in the behavioral sciences for almost 40 years.”
“What you are testifying to is that a handful of Silicon Valley billionaires and giant corporations are able to spend millions of dollars, if not billions of dollars collectively, massively influencing the results of elections?” asked Cruz.
“Senator, with respect, I must correct you,” replied Epstein, “If Mark Zuckerberg chooses to send out a ‘Go Vote’ reminder just to democrats on Election Day, that doesn’t cost him a dime.” (Breitbart)
Donald Trump’s claim that Google has been manipulating search results has been debated hotly in the media. Trump has recently reignited his suspicions about Google.
View this post on Instagram
Google Expert to Senator Cruz: 15 Million 2020 Votes At Risk
By Corinne Weaver | Newsbusters, July 17, 2019:Big Tech’s biggest threat to democracy isn’t censorship or privacy: it’s election manipulation.
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, “Google and Censorship through Search Engines,” Dr. Robert Epstein, who researches the impact of Google, informed the hearing that “upwards of 15 million votes” were in jeopardy in the 2020 election. During his testimony, Epstein told Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) that in 2016, Google gave at least 2.6 million votes to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, “through bias and search results.” He stressed that was the lowest number.
When questioned further by Cruz, Epstein gave a more concise answer: “The range is between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes depending on how aggressive they were in using the techniques that I’ve been studying, such as the search engine manipulation effect, the search suggestion effect, the answer bot effect, and a number of others. They control these and no one can counteract them. These are not competitive. These are tools that they have at their disposal exclusively.”
Cruz was shocked by this, responding, “If any headline comes out of this hearing, that should be it.”
Epstein further warned, “In 2020, you can bet that all of these companies are going to go all out, and the methods they are using are invisible, they’re subliminal, they are more powerful than most any effects I’ve ever seen in behavioral sciences and I’ve been in behavioral sciences for almost 40 years.”
Cruz reminded those at the hearing that Google’s parent company, Alphabet, was Clinton’s biggest corporate supporter in 2016. The company donated $1.6 million to the former Secretary of State, according to OpenSecrets.org.
The senator asked Epstein after his testimony if it was true that a “handful of Silicon Valley billionaires and giant corporations are able to spend millions of dollars, if not billions, collectively massively influencing the results of the elections.” Epstein gave the troubling answer, “Senator, with respect I must correct you. If Mark Zuckerberg chooses to send out a go vote reminder to just Democrats on election day, that doesn’t cost him a dime.”
Cruz voiced the fears of the GOP when it came to Big Tech, saying “we have no way of knowing if Google or Facebook or Twitter sends things to Democrats or Republicans or how they bias it because its a black box with no transparency or accountability whatsoever.”
Epstein suggested that Congress move to make Google’s search index public, which would simply reshape the company slightly and make its decisions to rank and order information more transparent.
World Bulletin Interview:
The reality is that people trust the “unbiased” internet search giant Google so much it can actually influence up to 10 million undecided voters to choose Hillary Clinton for president, prominent US psychologist and author Robert Epstein told RT following years of research. This exclusive report in RT highlights how – despite being a supporter of the Democratic presidential nominee – Dr. Epstein believes Google’s unchecked algorithm of placing one candidate over the other in search results constitutes a “threat to democracy.”
RT: Robert, how did you discover that Google is possibly in cahoots with the Clinton campaign?
RE: Well I didn’t find out that they were necessarily supporting Hillary Clinton, that’s not what I found at first. First, through several years of research, I found that they had the power to control elections, the power to shift the votes. So, that was more than four years of experimental research with more than 10,000 people in 39 countries.
So, we established through some very careful experiments that by favoring one candidate in search rankings Google can shift a lot of votes. More than 20 percent of undecided voters overall, and in some demographic groups up to 80 percent of undecided voters. People trust search rankings so much that if one candidate is favored in search rankings that shifts peoples’ votes.
Now, more recently, many people have established that Google has a very close relationship with Hillary Clinton. That didn’t come from my research, that came from all kinds of investigative research by many people.
RT: Are you going to take a look at Facebook and Twitter as well? It looks like social media play an even bigger role in the elections than televised debates.
RE: Well, we know now that Facebook has the power to shift about 600,000 votes to Hillary Clinton on Election Day with no one knowing this is occurring. All they have to do is send out “Go out and vote” reminders to Hillary Clinton’s supporters, but not to Trump’s supporters. That would cause a lot of people to vote who would otherwise stay home. So yes, we’ve looked at Facebook, we’ve looked at Twitter. But again, Facebook can shift 600,000 votes, Google can shift somewhere between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes.
RT: Have you been able to find abnormal search results by Google in some other countries intended to influence the outcome of elections?RE: We haven’t look carefully at too many countries. We’ve looked at the UK election in 2015, we looked at the national election in India, at the Lok Sabha election in 2014. What we do know is that it is the nature of Google’s algorithm to put one candidate ahead of another. That happens automatically. That happens, as Google would say, organically. So, this means that Google’s algorithm has probably been determining the outcomes of close elections around the world for many years, probably actually controlling the winner in as many as 25 percent of the national elections of the world.
RT: What do you think about this threat of big data? Do you think Google and other search engines analyses all search results by an individual for a good purpose?
RE: Well, big data at the moment is a threat. It’s a threat to democracy, at least as we have it in the United States, it’s a threat to human freedom, it’s a threat to civil liberties. This is mainly because the technologies are very new, and new means of control, of surveillance, of manipulation are being developed which at the moment are not regulated – they’re not covered by any laws or regulations. So, the problem is that these technologies have developed quickly, and we have not developed systems for monitoring these technologies, we’ve not developed systems for regulating these technologies. Obviously, we must do so.
RT: You’ve said that unlike Europe, Russia and China were able to overcome the Google monopoly, but a lot of people are still using this search engine. Do you think that the US company can manipulate public opinion in Russia as well?
RE: Well, it’s hard for them to manipulate opinion if they don’t dominate that country. Google dominates most of the countries in the world. The only countries it doesn’t dominate are Russia and China. So, Russia and China are protected a little bit from Google, but Russia and China have their own problems. Russia has Yandex, China has Baidu, and these companies can use techniques just as the ones that Google is using and perhaps they’re already using these techniques. These techniques can be used by any big tech company that provides a search engine. These techniques can be used by any big tech company that provides search suggestions.
My newest research shows, for example, that Google seems to be favoring Hillary Clinton in its search suggestions, the suggestions it gives you when you first start to type an item, and from new research I’ve done, we know that if you suppress negative search suggestions from one candidate, that shifts votes and opinions towards that candidate. So, Google is not the only problem. Any of these big tech companies can use these techniques for surveillance, for manipulation, for control, and I think we have to be concerned about the big tech industries in general around the world, not just Google.
RT: How do you oppose such great power being wielded by one corporation like Google?
RE: Well, the problem with a lot of power being in the hands of one company is that the private company is not answerable to the public. The private company does not have people who we voted on. The private company might be run almost like a monarchy, with the CEO having enormous power and the public having no say whatsoever in what they do, even not having access to their internal records. So we would have no idea of exactly what they’re doing or how they’re doing it and how they’re making decisions. This is potentially very dangerous. The situation right now is unprecedented in human history. There has never been so much power placed in the hands of so few people who are beyond the reach of any laws, beyond the reach of any regulations, and who don’t necessarily have the public interest in mind.
I made a prediction on Twitter recently, you can check this: I not only have predicted that he will set up his own television network but that he will launch his network with a guaranteed hit show. It will be a reality TV show about Donald Trump running for president, and that will be a hit show, so I think that’s his only interest here. Hillary Clinton will become our next president, it’s guaranteed and in my opinion Donald Trump has no interest, never had any interest in becoming president.
RT: Do you believe that Hillary Clinton will become US president through the manipulation of public opinion?
RE: Oh, Hillary Clinton is guaranteed to win this election, and I have said previously based on polls that seem to show a kind of a close vote, that those polls did not take into account the power that Google and other companies have to shift votes. That’s missing from these polls. So, once you realize the power that these companies have, Hillary Clinton is absolutely guaranteed to win, and she will win in the margin of somewhere between 2.6 million and 10 million votes. If we take the mean, the average of those two numbers, I guess you could say it’s pretty clear that she will win by approximately 6.5 million votes.
RT: Given that the United States has such an expensive and powerful media industry, would you say that voters in the US have a real picture of the presidential campaign?
RE: Well, voters in the United States I think do get a pretty good picture because we have so many different kinds of media and people are just bombarded with information from newspapers, magazines and the internet, more than 400 different television channels. So I think we do get a pretty complex and deep picture of things, but you have to remember that all of these forms of media are competitive. So, we’re getting one perspective from one magazine, another perspective from another magazine.
But when you come to something like Google, there’s no competition. There’s no competitor. It’s a completely different kind of influence, it’s non-competitive. In other words, if you’re still trying to make up your mind and you go to Google and ask a question about the candidates or about some sort of issue related to the election, Google will show you whatever it wants to show you and that can easily, easily tip your opinion one way or the other and there’s no competitor, there’s no way for anyone to compensate what Google just told you.
So, this is a completely new and very dangerous kind of influence. It has no competition, there’s no corrective for it, and people trust Google – we know this from surveys – people trust Google more than they trust any newspaper, any magazine or any television station. People trust information that they get from a computer much more than information they’re getting from television or a newspaper because they know that television and newspapers are biased, because they know that people are actually giving them the information. But when they get information out of a computer they mistakenly believe that that information is impartial, that information is objective and of course, that’s not really true, but that’s what people believe.
source: RT
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
45 Comments
4 years ago
DuckDuckGo instead of google. Deleted Facebook. Never used twitter but did look at gabai and am suspicious of Microsoft pushing bing and MSN. You have to be paranoid just to keep up with the swine.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Agree. After facebook, twitter , even Google, youtube joins lslamofascist gang to support illegals and jihadis
suppress conservative free speech
who is really behind it http://tinyurl.com/lgp28rs
4 years ago
Reply to
Suresh
Goolag owns youtube so their corporate/political culture must be the same, although I’m surprised Robert Spencer and Anne Marie Waters are still allowed to post videos to youtube considering their islamofauxbic outlook.
4 years ago
Reply to
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
I guess, he is not supporter of Trump . They are too busy for now going after Trump supporters.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Something to think about. To admit that possibly falsified news and ads can sway you is to publically admit a character defect.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
Yes I have to agree with that but then some people are quite stupid and often not the ones you would think were. If you are reasonably well read none of the lies resonate which then tells you much about current leftist youth who live off a phone. Using a phone as your sole internet gateway so often reduces the search to a preprogramed liars pack as you simply cannot do in depth searches and so finish up using trash like Wikipedia as an info source. Scary!
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Agree completely. I’ve subscribed to over 50 YT channels and lot of times they go off original story and add commentary. Very little documentary style channels probably due to huge time and effort and expense. Also to find competence takes time and thorough diligence, which most don’t have either, so here we are.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
That is s0 because both YouTube and Facebook have morphed from service providrs to propaganda and control medium and I think that while this may not have been the original aim, the power and control it allowed was too much to resist. Historical documentaries created now are ALL tainted with leftist revisionism and I find myself switching off more and more as soon as I see that blatant leftist “stool”(polite) onscreen. The fact that this has been well underway in Hollywood movies and especially so in the tsunami of TV series pouring out means that many show I would love to watch , bite the dust as soon as sir leftist stool shows up. (star trek, dr who, 007 soon to be, Jack Ryan …no end to the bastardization of things we once loved.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
In the USA the average IQ is 97, which means that 50% of the population has an IQ of less than 97 and are highly susceptible to manipulation.
4 years ago
Reply to
John Acord
Strangely enough it is more often the “smart” ones, or those who think themselves “smart” that are sucked in by leftist lunacy and when added to what is now an almost illiterate(WRT truth) academic experience makes them overripe for manipulation. The lesser IQ ones often have built in strategies to defend themselves against such and only keywords such as “workers”, “blue collar” etc. can even pass first base and while they often do march in step with the left it is purely because they are not thinking as when they do so they often step out unless heavily targeted as individuals. Trump has appealed to this group as they can see the lies and the inconsistency of the left, smarter ones don’t even look.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Of course there are many exceptions to the general rule I have set forth above,but the correlation between those who want freebies and IQ is still very high.
4 years ago
Reply to
John Acord
Once you hit the bottom levels of IQ….<70 you are quite correct. But I think that slackness generally can affect any IQ level and it is simply that those with higher IQs obtain more motivation from the world around them and does not guarantee that they will use their gift usefully.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
I think the term”gift”is used too loosely in this context. Intelligence is an inheritance from parents that choose their mates carefully and to a lesser extent provided a wholesome environment in which this inheritance flourishes.Intelligence,in other words is not accidental.
4 years ago
Reply to
John Acord
Intelligence as measured by IQ is only part(albeit an important one) of the intelligence spectrum. It denies creativity(as do exams which pander to it) and it ignores specific gifts such as musical, linguistic and graphics ones and not a few more. It is a rough estimate at best and while the “low IQ” insult can be academically damning, there are many useful areas that find such a limited view bigoted and wrong. An example: creativity is linked to question asking, NOT question answering. IQ tests and most exams select specifically against divergent thinking(BTW this is inborn NOT as de Bono says) and for convergent thinking(question answering). Divergent thinkers never have the highest IQs as their spread is much greater and the exams select against them. Ever wonder why there were so many geniuses in the 19th century and so few in the 20th? Mass education raises the IQ level of a nation but severely culls its creativity(as shown by the rubbish put out as “art” and “music”). I can pass on some references but The Act of Creation by Koestler is a start as it is a huge are and ne that damns western educational views.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
I see you bring a lot to the table. What are your thoughts on teaching intuitive understanding as opposed to teaching memorization. I have worked with a lot of people and the end result is huge.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
Difficult area: currently too much emphasis is placed upon the need for memory in many job/exams and this is as expected as technology requires it. It is why Asians do so well in our unis. Intuitive is okay in technologically lesser societies but in modern society it creates huge gaps in the “scholarship” profile and in the capacity of that student to survive the rigours of a profession. The problem is that memorization of lists will help you pass any current exam but intuitive is inborn and you can help it flourish but you cannot create it (also why so many Asians are sterile). Modern exams tend to stifle intuition . ideally education should be tailored to the individual (as opposed to mass schooling) but unless your parents are exceptionally wealthy or incredibly unselfish that is not possible as a rule. Beethoven would NEVER have been a great composer if born now nor would Einstein even manage to pass peer review and publish.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Thankyou for volunteering your thoughts on this. I consider it one of the major topics that is not being at least discussed.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
The stifling of creativity via the methods currently used to teach and examine students is quite marked. But then education now is about mass production and numbers, not quality and in fact, quality is seen as disruptive and a visit to the headmaster/Dean. The 19th century has so many men(and it kills me to write this as I am afraid that women fall far behind here) of talent that upon reflection it has to be a function of their schooling as opposed to current methods. Think of a Rolls-Royce compared to a Ford. Quantity up and quality down now compared to then as many had home schooling. Add to this the death of the really dedicated apolitical teacher and we are heading for a major dump(as in a wave crashing) IMO.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
All Android smartphones are using a Goolag developed OS, considering the subject of this article, that should make everyone wary of just what kind of data their smartphones might be (LOL) sending to Goolag.
4 years ago
Reply to
Michelle
Let’s just hope that DuckDuckGo isn’t doing stuff like Google… but without oversight it’s clear that these companies as well as MSM have more power and influence than the Russians that the Left and RINOs were all hyperventilating about. The real threat to our democracy isn’t outside influence… it is manipulations by social media and MSM.
4 years ago
I used to go on Facebook for a number of interests, like motorcycle repair, etc.
But the newsfeed I had selected all disappeared after a while. It was then that I decided I was being manipulated.
YouTube always shows SJW type ‘You Also Might Like’ suggestions when I go there for videos.
Michelle’s comment below is right. Avoid the tech companies as much as possible. Go with Duck-Duck-Go.
4 years ago
Pam said it’s time for war council. I told her a LONG time ago she needed to quit fighting to fight and start fighting to win. She still has not come out publically against abortion in any way, and the type of men who fight holy wars will not fight for that! Time to grow up and put your big girl pants on.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
Brad.. in my own attacks against radicalized African immigrants I asked Pamela to just do some Veritas style undercover work.
She knows the time is not quite here to go bare knuckle in the war.
Lets continue following the more intelligent exposure path as she prefers to do.
She may be correct.
4 years ago
Reply to
Dan Roley
Honestly, she’s done that job extremely well as have many here who comment. Most here, even those who post sparsely are familiar enough with Islam that further awareness isn’t necessary. If you aren’t aware it’s because you don’t care and thus are worthless. She’s done her job and it’s time to move up and begin to wrest control of the enemies. You can’t do that 1/2 way, it takes a full commitement and proving yourself to the task. That starts with ridding yourself from baggage that will give your enemies legit ammunition.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
forever! FOREVER! that Texas Cartoon contest got 1 jihadi killed. A 2nd jihadi was arreated in site.
Geller has fatwah placed on her for 6 yrs.
We got the Right Lady in Pamela.
See you in New York for her Speaking Engagement.
Stay Alert.
4 years ago
Reply to
Dan Roley
Was with her in Garland. Won’t make this speech. Came to NY for Sarsour protest. Went to St. Louis, but can’t make this one. Hope you can wrap those in attendance with divine protection, or try at least to minimize impact of hostiles. I told her before Garland that we all needed to come a day early and get Red Cross 1st aid training. Rebellious, wouldn’t listen. Add desperate abandon for movement is my concern here, so keep a look out, if you will.
4 years ago
Reply to
Bradley Lexvold
no need to be stressed about Geller talk in NY.
You are right on Target..especially now with Omar and Tlaib giving jihad power cheers..
For entertaiment..if you get bored..go volunteer to teach an English class to incoming African immigrants/refugees.
That is Exactly how I got into the Geller ” no jihad” works.
4 years ago
And here we’ve been told it’s the ‘RUSSIANS’ !!!!! HACKING OUR SACRED ELECTIONS …. BOO HOO !!
…….. the Russians of silicon valley !
4 years ago
While this voter manipulation is bad enough, Trump better address mass voter fraud because that is going to be the go-to plan for the Dem0rats in the 2020 presidential election.
4 years ago
Reply to
MuhamMUDTheFakeProphet
The Commiecrats will not win the 2020 Election, they will steal it, and this is just one of their many, many tools. This cannot be allowed to happen and it may come to civil war, so be prepared, locked and loaded. They may be cunning thieves but we have most of the guns.
4 years ago
Google expert Dr. Epstein probably has a hard time with his name at the moment,
as he is involuntarily associated with his pedophile namesake “Jeffrey”, who, btw.,
was a member of the “Trilateral Commission” and the “Council of Foreign Relation”.
Social Media Summit: “While Trump was talking about Twitter in the White House, the short news
service was struggling with problems. For many users, Twitter messages were temporarily una-
vailable. A live world map of the website allestörungen.de showed that users in Western and
Central Europe, the USA, Brazil and Japan in particular reported problems.After about an hour,
Twitter explained that the breakdown had been fixed and the system was running again.”
4 years ago
Suspend elections and have Trump remain in the next term by default……
4 years ago
I still respect Senator Ted Cruz and this is just one more reason why!
4 years ago
Congratulations to that committee, a powerful testimony in the defence of democracy.
The left now have nowhere to hide, consider yourselves busted.
In UK the issue swirls around “family voting” which is illegal and postal votes.
The left like in USA benefits.
4 years ago
I often wondered how foul Demoncraps can get elected over and over.
Either the party be banned or paper ballots be mailed to each home adult. All must be returned whether you are voting or not.
Match it up to a database and hand counted by a certified party.
4 years ago
I know aol has censored comments i’ve made that are not along their liberal biased narrative –
4 years ago
enemy inside
4 years ago
The government in the U.S. must closely monitor all of the big tech companies for efforts to sway elections. Suggest they set up phoney left wing accounts as well as the same number of right wing accounts and monitor everything closely including reminders sent by the companies, results provided for enquires etc. Tell all of these companies that if it is determined they are taking efforts to sway any election the government will make every effort to shut them down.
4 years ago
Reply to
Defence Man
There have to be numerous federal and state civil and criminal violations of election laws. A full investigation must be launched and those who are responsible indicted and imprisoned.
4 years ago
here Is NO doubt that Google is engaged in treason against the USA by its agreements, technology transfers, and other crimes with the ChiComs. Thiel laid out the case very clearly, and Trump tweeted his agreement. This is a real national emergency. Trump should have the military immediately seize and freeze all Google Assets, arrest the executives for treason, and shut this monster down before the elections. Hopefully, this will be deterrent to the other high tech companies.If you are directly or indirectly a holder of Google stock I would sell it NOW!
4 years ago
This wouldn’t be even a remote possibility had the constitutional framers not first usurped Yahweh’s exclusive one-vote election process (per Deuteronomy 17:10 & 15, etc.) and turned it over to We the People. In other words, today’s election fraud is but the whirlwind created with the wind when the18th-century founding fathers committed
election fraud against the God of the Bible:
“[B]ecause they have … trespassed against my law … they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind….” (Hosea 8:1, 7)
Talk about a dumb idea! Turning elections over to the “discretion* of We the People, the majority of whom, according to Matthew 7:13, are in the broad way leading to destruction, has got to take the cake. Just where do you suppose the broad-way bunch are going to take America? Perhaps to the precipice of moral depravity and *destruction,* precisely where America finds herself today!?!
For more, see blog article “Constitutional Elections: Dining at the ‘Devil’s Table,'” at
http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/constitutional-elections-dining-at-the-devils-table/
For more regarding this election usurpation, see online Chapter 5 “Article 2: Executive Usurpation” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at
http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt5.html
Scroll down to the heading “Elections.”
4 years ago
There is no point in having these endless useless “hearings”…. WHEN WE ALREADY KNOW they are mass censoring conservatives which is, by very definition, election meddling and a violation of 1st Amendment rights.
“No Christians, Jews, or anyone else who disagrees with Islam or the Left allowed on the public sidewalk” is currently what the sign reads.
In a truly free country…. people have the RIGHT to “love”, or “hate” whatever or whoever they wish. Hitler first LABELED the Jews, then branded them, then had them executed.
The Left and Islam are FULLY ALLIED attempting to Label all dissenters as “hateful” or “bully’s”. When in fact, only bullies and tyrants attempt to ban free speech.
