Abbas takes over largest UN bloc, calls for “international protection force” for “Palestinians”

calls for “international protection force” for “Palestinians”
I think that is a good idea to have “Protection Forces” in Gaza & The West Bank
They need to round up the Militia, Police & Sharia thugs who abuse the Palestinian people.

One should not be so surprised by DS strategic tension [i.e. world destabilization].:

“…So, during the intifada, the US position was that it would not
“recognize or negotiate with the PLO” unless the PLO accepted a resolution
that laid the groundwork for a PLO state. Nice trick. What this makes clear
is that the US was merely biding its time, waiting for the moment when it
could appear to yield to international pressure to include the PLO in the
talks, thus lessening the appearance of having an anti-Israel policy.”

http://www.hirhome.com/israel/hirally2.htm#1987

“…What was happening at the UN while the intifada raged in the West Bank and
Gaza?
The so-called ‘intifada’ was the backdrop to a simultaneous effort in
the UN, also beginning in late 1987, to produce a Middle East ‘Peace’
Conference. This was under Kurt Waldheim’s successor Secretary General Javier
Perez de Cuellar, who managed to get practically every country in the world
to declare its support for including the PLO in the proposed talks.
The point of this, no different from the Nazi Kurt Waldheim’s own
pro-PLO moves at the UN (see 1974, 1975, and 1977 sections),
was to legitimize the PLO as a political player, and the accusations of
supposed Israeli oppression provided every government with political cover
for supporting the terrorist PLO. This all had an impact on ordinary people,
who are usually innocent pawns in the media machinations of the world’s
ruling classes. Thus, by January 1998, when the supposedly spontaneous riots
in the West Bank and Gaza were being baptized ‘intifada’, a poll estimated
that 78% of all Americans favored such a ‘peace’ conference. Of those, 74%
supported PLO participation in it.[132]
The United States government officially pretended to be the lonely opponent
to PLO participation in the proposed ‘peace’ conference (this is the sort of
thing that convinces Israelis that the US is their ‘only friend’). And Yasser
Arafat pretended to believe the US’s official declarations.
“Palestine Liberation Organization
leader Yasser Arafat today praised the Soviet Union for its efforts toward a
Middle East peace settlement, but…he said that the major obstacles to an
international conference on the middle east – to be attended by the five
permanent members of the UN security council, plus all sides involved in the
middle east conflict, including the PLO – were the US administration and
Israel.”[133]
But was the US an obstacle? In fact, no. As the same wire explained,
“The PLO leader said that Israeli foreign minister Shimon Peres and his supporters favor such a conference.”
What does this mean? We already saw that the US had a policy of going
radically out of its way to protect the PLO terrorists from the Israelis (see 1982 section),
and also that Shimon Peres, taking direct instruction from the US, had a
policy of radically going out of his way to do the US’s bidding in order to
betray Israel and assist the US’s pro-PLO policy (see 1985 section).
It therefore follows that if Shimon Peres was for including the PLO in the
Middle East ‘peace’ conference, then so was the US, regardless of what
American officials said in public.
But what American officials said in public actually confirms this
analysis [protecting PLO], because the US official position was that
…“Washington will not recognize or
negotiate with the PLO until it endorses U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338 – which
imply recognition of Israel’s right to exist – and renounces violence and
‘terrorism.’”[134]
This was a sly maneuver: presented as a defense of Israel, it was in
fact the most vicious attack. As you may recall, UN Resolution 242 called for
Israeli withdrawal from the territories it had conquered in 1967 after being
attacked by the surrounding Arab states. The goal of Israel’s Arab attackers
had been genocide (see 1964-67 section),
and they were promising other such attacks. Concluding the obvious, a US
Defense Department study done immediately after the 1967 Six Day War stated
that if Israel withdrew from the conquered territories it would be committing
suicide (see 1967 section).
And yet, despite this, the US immediately adopted the official position that
Israel should withdraw, and even conducted some rather aggressive diplomacy
to try to implement UN Resolution 242 (see 1969
section).
So, during the intifada, the US position was that it would not
“recognize or negotiate with the PLO” unless the PLO accepted a resolution
that laid the groundwork for a PLO state. Nice trick. What this makes clear
is that the US was merely biding its time, waiting for the moment when it
could appear to yield to international pressure to include the PLO in the
talks, thus lessening the appearance of having an anti-Israel policy.“…

” Abbas takes over largest UN bloc, calls for “international protection force” for “Palestinians”

What a splendid idea!

Escort them all to a vacant island in the Antarctic and give them free reign to fend for themselves.