Pulse nightclub jihad massacre survivors sue tech giants over ‘material support’ to ISIS

158

“The expansion and success of ISIS is in large part due to its use of the defendants’ social media platforms to promote and carry out its terrorist activities,” the lawsuit reads. “But for ISIS’s postings using defendants’ social media platforms, Mateen would not have engaged in his Orlando attack.”

Yes, and the social media giants let ISIS have a platform, allowing them to “act with impunity.” Instead of closing terrorists’ accounts, the social media giants cracked down hard on conservatives’ account, choking off our platforms and denying us the right to air our views. This is a massive problem, perhaps the biggest problem the U.S. faces today. Without the freedom of speech, we are not a free society. And the social media giants, which are conforming to sharia blasphemy laws, have far too much control over the means of communication in this country today. They need to be broken up, before even more damage is done.

“Pulse survivors sue tech giants over ‘material support’ to ISIS,” by Lukas Mikelionis, New York Post, April 6, 2018 (thanks to Kenny):

Story continues below advertisement

Survivors of the Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando, Fla., perpetrated by a supporter of the Islamic State terror group, are suing Google, Facebook and Twitter, alleging that the tech firms allowed the group to proliferate and spread propaganda.

In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Orlando’s federal courthouse, 16 victims of the June 12, 2016, shooting — the second-deadliest in American history — claim that the three tech giants were responsible for letting ISIS disseminate propaganda on their platforms, thus providing “material support” to the terror group, in violation of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act.

Such support, the suit alleges, let gunman Omar Mateen carry out his attack, which left 49 people dead and another 58 injured, the Orlando Sentinel reported. Mateen was killed in a shootout with responding police officers.

“By the time of the terror attacks in this case, ISIS had become one of the largest and most widely recognized and feared terrorist organizations in the world … due in large part to its use of the Defendants’ social media platforms to promote and carry out its terrorist activities,” wrote Ari Kresch and Keith Altman, the Michigan attorneys who filed the lawsuit.

“The expansion and success of ISIS is in large part due to its use of the defendants’ social media platforms to promote and carry out its terrorist activities,” the lawsuit reads. “But for ISIS’s postings using defendants’ social media platforms, Mateen would not have engaged in his Orlando attack.”

The survivors of the attack also argue that the tech giants profited from content created by ISIS and that the terror group may have received money from Google-owned YouTube in the form of ad revenue.

The suit requests a judge to declare that the three companies “have violated and are continuing to violate, the Anti-Terrorism Act” and force them to pay “compensatory damages in amounts to be determined at trial” in addition to covering legal costs and other relief….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
158 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

A fair and legitimate court case. As the social media, specifically face book and twitter have encouraged violence through their promotion of islam and subservience to sharia, they are responsible for their actions in the support, enabling and encouraging of muslim violence. If u tube received any form of remuneration for the display of terrorist propaganda, it is guilty of profiting from criminal activity.

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Agreed, Mahou, legitimate indeed. It will be interesting to watch the Socialist Media’s legal response, by hiding behind the First Amendment. Ironic is it not, how these so-called advocates of Progressive Liberalism are no more than sponsors of Islam’s Jihad while suppressing those daring to call Islam for what it is, a Cult of base hatred, bloodletting and debauchery. One can only hope that the judiciary which is polluted with leftists is held accountable. It is about time the self-appointed, media deities are held accountable for backing the Cult of Terror.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

Remember how Obama forbid looking a social media accounts for Muslim refugees and new Muslim immigrants?

The San Bernardino massacre was committed by Tashfeen Malik and Syed Rizwan Farook. Tashfeen was the his wife – they met up over the internet. It turned out her Facebook page and other social media had jihad all over it! She should NEVER have been allowed to come here! She was NOT VETTED AT ALL! That is a FACT. Screenshots of her Facebook and social media were made public – horrifying!
Seventeen people died and 14 were wounded because of this Muslim crap.

Comey was head of the FBI at the time and notice all the SUCCESSES Muslims had with jihad here! Be glad Hillary was not our President. She’d be snoozing away and Obama would still be running our country into the ground.

Obama’s policy was to respect the privacy of MUSLIM terrorists as he spied on legal Americans and his opposition.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

Agreed. It was determined, unfortunately after the fact, that the Pakistani address that Tashfeen character used on her passport application was a fake.

MZTYPLCK
MZTYPLCK
6 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

True, but you are stating the OBVIOUS.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago
Reply to  MZTYPLCK

Never hurts to state the obvious as many times as needed. Even then, many will not accept the obvious.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

It would be a very good thing for the social media to plead the first amendment in court, and have it accepted, that would pave the way to freedom of speech for everyone.

Logic PrObe
Logic PrObe
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

But that is not what they practice.
Try any anti muslim stuff on Facebook and see how far you get.
You see, I am banned because I was reported for truth telling.

rickyoo
rickyoo
6 years ago
Reply to  Logic PrObe

Try telling the truth about Muslims on the comments pages of any British internet news outlets and see how quickly you get banned. You are not allowed to criticize these barbaric invaders, as you must not upset them. If you protest in public, you will be arrested courtesy of sharia May and her PC police.

Logic PrObe
Logic PrObe
6 years ago
Reply to  rickyoo

Appeal to the Mayor of London!
Doh!

concerned
concerned
6 years ago
Reply to  Logic PrObe

I have been cut off Fb 3x now, for just making an obvious remark re muslims…They put out stuff that begs a reaction, but when you state the obvious, the ‘handlers” step in again and cut you off.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Logic PrObe

face book is a waste of time, I never would have anything to do with it.

Logic PrObe
Logic PrObe
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Someone has to stand up to them!
(I’m banned BTW…………)

Logic PrObe
Logic PrObe
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Pity…………..you’d be banned in no time!

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Logic PrObe

What would be the point it that?

freepetta
freepetta
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

That’s bs. We already have the first amendment. Facebook and Twitter don’t practice that for Conservatives and other patriots. Hopefully Facebook will be sued till they close their sites as will others. You can’t practice the first amendment only when u please. The freedom destroying terrorists should be permanently censored ?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  freepetta

Having the first amendment and applying it are two completely seperate issues.

freepetta
freepetta
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

It’s not meant to be 2 separate issues. The first amendment is not to be politicized as the libs do with all amendments they don’t like. It’s not meant for liberal interpretation.

The libs want the first amendment to be applied only to them.

Your remark to me is totally the opposite of what you wrote previously to another. Just saying……….

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  freepetta

There is more than one view of a subject, like a diamond, the facets show its completeness.

freepetta
freepetta
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I am a gemologist. I am certified in diamond grading. That was a poor analogy. Honestly I think all your vast posts are vague and shallow. Sometimes I think you’re just humoring us.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  freepetta

You may be an anything, but perception is a large part of reality. If you don’t like my comments don’t read them.

Moya McNulty
Moya McNulty
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Do you think that would ACTUALLY work? (Shhhh)

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Moya McNulty

Law and court decisions are based on precedent, a nice free speech decision that allows for it, would be useful.

Moya McNulty
Moya McNulty
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Let me get this straight – if Facebook won, using “free speech” as defense – if they succeeded with that precedent – victims would have to go to a higher court. Would the victims of Orlando ever be
able to win? There’s a difference between “Free Speech” and “Inciting Violence”, which is not included in “free speech”. I got really angry with this disgusting pig SUCKERBURGER and vowed to get ALL the people I know to LEAVE FACE BOOK if things don’t change IMMEDIATELY. Then it occurred to me that they would REMOVE ME from facebook if they saw that I was doing that.
So I have to come up with some way of doing it without being detected. Got any ideas? I really do
know a lot of people all over the world – if I could somehow ACTIVATE them, we could do some serious work. But it would have to be done without detection. I guess discussing it publicly this way is not too smart either. Oh Brother!
Which reminds me, did you ever see the movie with George Clooney & Jeff Bridges “Men who talk
to GOATS”

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Moya McNulty

If they won using the constitution amendment #1 it would set precedent for others to get the same privilege or face the same repercussions. Right now face book is ignoring the first amendment and any other laws it feels like.

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

Agree. They are only taking out conservative, patriots , anti-Left/liberal and anti-jihad posts
and allow jihadi posts to continue !

Like this news of brutal gang rape of swedish girl and what they did to her is even worse
http://bit.ly/2z2rVov

But it was suppressed /played down !

Lawrence Stone
Lawrence Stone
6 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy46

> It will be interesting to watch the Socialist Media’s legal response, by hiding behind the First Amendment.

The first Amendment allows one to say anything but one cannot hide behind it when yelling “fire” in a crowded theater. If the tech giants play the 1st Amendment game then, like yelling “fire”, they are accountable for the result of their “free” speech.

Trump can't ban islam
Trump can't ban islam
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

good news for islam. now Facebook, Google, Twitter will ban ALL extremist content, aka islamophobic websites, right wing accounts, etc. But you can’t sue, ban the quran, islam, the hadiths, mosques, islamic centers, imans……
islam will dominate

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

islam will be top maggot on the manure pile it is thrown on.

Deanne Martin
Deanne Martin
6 years ago

Pigshite

Vlad
Vlad
6 years ago

Pucker: cow, oral sex .. pucker your lips, don’t spread your s h i t here.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

Hey sport, would you consider this “extremist content?” GFY!

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I hope it is a huge class action lawsuit and bankrupts them all. Just shut it down!

Kalambong Kalambong
Kalambong Kalambong
6 years ago
Reply to  felix1999

They are not fit to be ‘social media’

They are indoctrination tools for moslems and marxists

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Unless one can show active promotion of such, Section 230, Title 47 of the US Code will kill the lawsuit.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

No, it will not, when damage can be proven of living of the avails of criminal activity, it is a criminal, not civil case.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Our little aemoreira1981 is back to in of her favorite “make-believe” games. She’s a pretend lawyer … keeps her out of her mommy’s hair.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Probably found an old copy of a book on the law for every one, a pulp fiction put out by the American Automobile Association or some one like it, years ago. Now, with that and a “Law for dummies” it is an expert on being stupid. Now if she can find her crayons, will be quiet for a while.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I posited a theory, a few months ago, that while she was at K-Mart, she walked past a clearance book bin, picked up an old copy of “The Law and You”. She turned it over … looked at the back cover … and dropped it back into the bin …. Now, when she plays “make-believe”, her favorite game is “pretend lawyer”.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

She’s the type of person that tells everyone she comes in contact with, at work, church, etc., to sue anyone who offends you.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

The thing is, she thinks she knows EVERYTHING about the law.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Ain’t she cute. Such a li’l darlin’.

freepetta
freepetta
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Facebook, Twitter, instagram and a host of other popular social media outlets are directly responsible for recruitment and resources to ISIS, Al Qaeda etc etc etc.. These horrendous sites censor, spy on and suspend accounts who espouse any kind of love and patriotism for the U.S.

These hateful libs fail to realize their children are going to live in a far more dangerous and hopelessly terrorized country.

All Suckerberg’s money isn’t going to protect his children from what he and his lib counterparts are going to have to deal with. These rich unethical people are destroying their own country.

As the saying goes, be careful what you wish for. Suckerberg and his like will pay dearly for their traitorous actions.

Meitnerium
Meitnerium
6 years ago

I hate to say it but this lawsuit does not likely have a chance of winning. These big technical companies are supported by governments and will be protected by them. I hope I am wrong and this lawsuit succeeds, however.

Ziggy46
Ziggy46
6 years ago
Reply to  Meitnerium

I am, also, concerned about the judiciary and the embedded enablers whose sole intent is to protect, aid and abet anyone bent on the ultimate erasure of democracy, freedom of speech etc. Hopefully, our worries will come to nothing but in this day and age, these concerns are legitimate.

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago
Reply to  Meitnerium

It is a concern but there is allot of evidence to support that they are in the wrong. Zuckerberg has been busy in D.C. hiring lobbyists. We’ll see who wins. Zuck is a loose cannon and making more problems for himself with his dumb mouth.

mztore
mztore
6 years ago
Reply to  Meitnerium

I hope you are wrong also, but it is sort of like trying to sue the federal government. No win situation. They have a bigger purse.

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
6 years ago

I’d say sue the printers of the koran

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Halal Bacon

Or sue the writers.

Sing On
Sing On
6 years ago

They forgot about Microsoft Live. But this law suit has a slim chance because they have to prove that management knew of the inappropriate content and prevented employees from removing it.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago

comment image

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago


Big tech will secretly settle with these plaintiffs and Big tech will continue to ensure American and Jewish hatred SPREADS to every corner of our world !!!
comment image

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

Typically, these cases end in dismissal.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Typically, your comments are dismissed as those of an idiot.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Ha, ha, ha. Awesome

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Typically, your multiple requests for less shock therapy are ‘dismissed.’

felix1999
felix1999
6 years ago

Zuckerberg is s dope. He is way out there in LEFT field.
The more he talks the more trouble he gets himself into.

Case in point is his interview with Vox.com, in which Zuckerberg managed to generate a new round of bad press over Facebook’s privacy scandal, talked about having some sort of Supreme Court decide what constitutes “acceptable speech” and how Facebook (FB) hampers independent media outlets. Oh, and he apparently thinks patriotism is arcane.

The latest privacy flap came when Zuckerberg suggested that Facebook scans private messages sent over its Messenger app and blocks those IT deems inappropriate.

During the interview, he talked about blocking “sensational messages” that Facebook believed were meant to incite harm. “Our systems detect that that’s going on,” he said. “We stop those messages from going through.”

On Wednesday, Facebook officials confirmed the practice to Bloomberg.

The public response has not been favorable. One Twitter user commented “Facebook is the new NSA.” Another tweeted “Facebook: The world’s youngest surveillance state.”

After days of silence in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been talking up a storm. Given the kinds of things he’s been saying, it might be better if he went back to his Silent Zuck routine.

Case in point is his interview with Vox.com, in which Zuckerberg managed to generate a new round of bad press over Facebook’s privacy scandal, talked about having some sort of Supreme Court decide what constitutes “acceptable speech” and how Facebook (FB) hampers independent media outlets. Oh, and he apparently thinks patriotism is arcane.

The latest privacy flap came when Zuckerberg suggested that Facebook scans private messages sent over its Messenger app and blocks those it deems inappropriate.

During the interview, he talked about blocking “sensational messages” that Facebook believed were meant to incite harm. “Our systems detect that that’s going on,” he said. “We stop those messages from going through.”

On Wednesday, Facebook officials confirmed the practice to Bloomberg.

The public response has not been favorable. One Twitter user commented “Facebook is the new NSA.” Another tweeted “Facebook: The world’s youngest surveillance state.”

When not talking about how Facebook is censoring private messages, Zuckerberg told Vox’s Ezra Klein about how he wants Facebook to censor content its users share, by acting like a government and setting up an independent body to determine what was “acceptable speech.”

“You can imagine,” he said, “some sort of structure, almost like a Supreme Court, that is made up of independent folks who don’t work for Facebook, who ultimately make the final judgment call on what should be acceptable speech in a community that reflects the social norms and values of people all around the world.”

It’s a good thing Zuckerberg wasn’t around when the founders were drafting the First Amendment.

But what exactly does he think would constitute global “social norms and values” in a world that includes countries where gays are executed, infidels killed, political opponents jailed, and free press suppressed?

Zuckerberg also talked about how his company “worked directly” with the German government to monitor content before elections there, saying that “if you work with the government in a country, they’ll actually have a fuller understanding of what is going on.”

That prompted the Wall Street Journal’s James Freeman to write: “The idea of Facebook working with governments around the world to filter news is more frightening than almost any commercial use of user data one can imagine.”

We could not agree more.

Zuckerberg then went on to explain how Facebook is tilting the playing field toward mainstream, liberal media outlets by boosting their ranking in its News Feed.

“We’ve surveyed people across the whole community and asked them whether they trust different news sources,” he said. Naturally, big-name news outlets made the list.

Even Klein, a liberal, balked at this, saying he felt Facebook was creating “a huge return to incumbency.”

The right-wing Breitbart news site put it more succinctly, saying Facebook was working to “crush new media.”

When not making bad press for Facebook, Zuckerberg had other peculiar things to say.

He talked about how the company has “done a lot of research into what drives well-being for people.” Apparently, that research didn’t turn up much, since researchers have found that social media use contributes to depression, and the latest IBD/TIPP poll finds that two-thirds think Facebook is harmful to society.

At another point, Zuckerberg appears to dismiss pride of country as old fashioned.

“One of the things I found heartening is if you ask millennials what they identify the most with, it’s not their nationality,” he said. “The plurality identifies as a citizen of the world. And that, I think, reflects the values of where we need to go.”

There is no doubt that Zuckerberg is a smart guy and savvy businessman. But maybe if he focused on things like protecting his users’ privacy — the one issue that has galvanized the public — rather than “We Are the World” fantasies and “acceptable speech” codes, his company wouldn’t be in so much trouble.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-privacy-scandal-zuckerberg-interview-messenger-app/

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago

If these companies were owned by conservatives … or even legitimate entrepreneurs … they would lose.

But Google has never lost a case – and they are about as legitimate as the 19th century railroad scams … meaning they are immune.

If these folks walk with any cash – it will be a testament to their victim cards – and the case will be deemed an exception that sets no precedent with any authority in any jurisdiction … so the whole thing is a one-off.

We need to hit Google and all of its fellow travelers with a Public Accommodation requirement under the 14th Amendment – and hold them accountable for terrorism support only in the event of actual terrorism (otherwise the Left will quickly rule all of our comments – including this one – to be ‘TERRRORISSSMM’).

And note – if these utilities cannot be held to account for Public Accommodation – the same way Christian bakers are held to account – Google can squash its competitors.

Folks – you’ve got to STOP THINKING THIS IS A MARKET – IT IS A WAR – and the likes of Vimeo and Minds.com and Bitchute won’t stand a chance against a targeted campaign against their advertisers.

The war chests available to the Tech Giants are greater than the GDP of whole continents – and I’m not kidding.

The only way to deal with this is to legally gain the high moral ground and hit them with a combination shot.

And foolish ‘consistencies’ be darned.

It’s great to stand on principle … and Go Down with the Titanic … A lot of brave souls did that. But it is BETTER to be humble and STOP the ship BEFORE it SLAMS into the ICEBERG. The way the Carpathia and the Californian did.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

The Word of God is the final authority, Dan.

Regarding 19th Century railroad scams, perhaps you heard of the one “engineered” by Henry Villard (blind pool) enabling him to complete construction of the Northern Pacific Railroad ahead of James Hill’s Great Northern Railway. For what it is worth, at least these two believed in mode of transportation known as the railroad. Farmers, ranchers and traveling public held them in great mistrust. Then the government (such as the ICC), and later, labor unions, concocted a brew that will forever keep railroads in the United States from advancing past the post WW-II era in rolling stock & right-of-way technology and movement of large volumes of passengers swiftly and safely, as in Japan.

Such pro-railroad entrepreneurs are gone now, replaced by suck-up corporate bean counters and their Wall Street egghead stockholders and chairmen of the bored who can’t tell a semaphore from a caboose … oh well, these are outmoded today, anyway …

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Mark Steiner

No I don’t recall any specifics. Just that my grandfather was well versed in the history of the RR’s, unions, etc., and he lectured me on it many times. Had I listened more attentively, I’m sure I’d recall more.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

My dad worked for the NP until the Burlington Northern merger in 1970. Some details came from him. Otherwise, my research into this interesting topic is largely piecemeal and focused on the northern lines. Summarizing: there were railroads, then the barons and high freight rates. Eventually this inequity was trounced out of existence by the unions and government regulations. Railroads remained profitable as long as they could maintain a market share of hauling freight. But for many years during and after WWII, infrastructure & rights of way suffered. Unions contested in court every effort to trim the workforce when steam was replaced by diesel.

Passenger service was in slow decline due to more vehicular traffic and airport subsidies to airlines, but it took a nose-dive when railroads lost a first-class mail contract with the post office in (I believe about) 1967. The mail contract was about the only justificationcomment image to keep otherwise unprofitable passenger trains running.

Below is the sad, abandoned Northern Pacific Railway station and freight house in Beach, ND, prior to demolition in 2014. As America goes …

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Mark Steiner

It’s an interesting story. Our fathers’ magic carpets … and all that.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Exactly. But my dad’s job was Labor Relations … tough, and bad for one’s health.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Even if they were owned by conservatives, 47 US 230 in the US Code would be an absolute block. As for 14A…that won’t work either since Google isn’t an arm of the United States government.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

aemoreia … love you dude, but you’ve got to stop playing lawyer on the ComBox.

1. Yes, 47 US 230 is a good defense as it offers blanket immunity to social media companies for content. And

2. If I wanted to waste a lot of time, I can bolster that case with a long brief, and dozens (hundreds?) of cases absolving businesses of liability for the criminal actions of users. This is why Lefties cannot sue Ford for making a truck – or sue Home Depot for renting a truck – or sue the State DOT for building a road – even though some nut, crank, or Islamist takes rents a Ford truck, drives it down a road, and then goes off road to deliberately and intentionally kill people.

Buuuuuuttttt ……

3. There are several holes in this – and as I pointed out these holes would be as obvious as CNN if this was Left vs. the victims rather than the victims vs. the Left.

4. Thousands (millions?) of cases exist where the liability of a business for a crime committed on its property or with its property is firmly established. When a McD’s lost $24MM for ‘letting’ an ex-employee kill a cop in their parking lot – the size of the judgment was surprising – but the outcome was not. And it gets worse for the defendants.

5. When a business acts as an accomplice – allowing their services to be used in furtherance of a crime – they become accomplices in the criminal act. AND – the criminal act essentially waives virtually all immunity for compliance with any other regulatory provision OR exemption OR safe harbor. I should know – I lectured many business owners on this principle because Environmental Law is riddled with EXPLICIT examples of this sort of loophole – where you can be totally green and in compliance with the law, but a ‘criminal act’ like not keeping your monitoring equipment running properly can undo all of one’s best efforts to be a good law abiding citizen.

6. And let me tell you – the case law today is full of examples of ‘right’ is wrong, and ‘Left’ is ‘the law.’ Leftist courts would be happy to borrow from one set of laws for another. One of the worst and most egregious examples is the collective guilt of businesses under joint and several liability – which effectively passes guilt through any number of links depending on how Left-wing the judge is – BUT criminal law has carved out explicit exemptions – followed by every court in the land without regard to precedent or any other principle of law – for Gangs and Unions. That’s how Unionists can slash my tires with impunity (and that did happen), but I cannot key their car in retaliation with impunity.

7. And btw – if 230 violates the Federal constitution – or for that matter even a State constitution – the relevant court can dispense with it. A State court doing so would have to consider the risk of being overruled by the Feds – but oh, wait, … yeah, the Feds will not interfere if they agree with the States’ reasoning. Butttt…

8. It’s more likely a State would rule it inapplicable as an affirmative defense in the case, and narrow the case to State law, which raises no constitutional challenges.

9. So – upshot – 230 could easily be vacated. It would not even take balls or chutzpah. Just pull the cases one wants to pull and distinguish the instant case from those contemplated by the regulations written pursuant to the black letter of Sec. 230. And if there’s nothing to suit the court – borrow it from some other area of law.

10. As to ‘arm of the US govt.’ … This is another pea under the eggshell – now you see it, now you don’t – argument.

While legal scholars on both sides have sought to use this to limit Federal intrusion into the affairs of individuals, citizens, employees, and also – agencies, States, Indian Reservations, businesses, and contractors (and there are parallels in every State btw) … the fact is

IT DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS CASE.

And if this was a Left vs. right/victims case, that would be obvious.

The 14th Amendment applies to essentially everyone engaged in INTERSTATE COMMERCE. Thank you or not to FDR and the New Deal – and the Public Accommodation cases of the Civil Rights Era. (Again – with parallels in every State.)

This is the whole basis for ordering KKK owned BBQ joints to sell BBQ to Negroes (and Jews and Catholics).

If ‘arm of govt’ meant anything, the entire Public Accommodation framework would collapse.

AND – It cuts both ways since the ‘arm of govt’ excuse grants the State the right to establish a religion in public schools at the same time the State cannot interfere with gang activity masquerading as a ‘religion’ in the prisons.

11. So your entire comment is completely wrong in every sense of the word.

God bless you, keep fighting the good fight, someone upstairs may appreciate it I’m sure.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Excellent rebuttal. Won’t shut her/him up though.

aebe
aebe
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Off topic , but are you in Oregon or Washington ? There was some tire slashing and other troubles with the Longshoremen’s union’s strike .

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  aebe

No. Ha. I live in east Texas.

And the tire slashing I referred to happened in 84 when I was in Texas City on the coast. I was an intern engineer, and the Unionists were just outraged.

Unionists – I use that term because not all of the members of the Union were a-holes. Only the True Believers – the fanatics. Several tried to keep me out of trouble. But they were not following the Union’s agenda either.

Moya McNulty
Moya McNulty
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

“SOMEBODY” should make bumper stickers “RIGHT is WRONG. LEFT is THE LAW”
Thank you. GOD BLESS YOU

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago

So Pam could be sued by Muslims on the basis that her website promotes violence o Muslims. And interesting concept. : >)
Hmm 116,300 comments to date Putin keeps your nose to the grindstone. Those roubles seem to be hard earnt..

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Ed… Where did you pull that from?

Come on … where is the incitement to hate and kill Muslims?

Or are we just spewing hatred and ignorant bigotry tonight as usual?

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Dan ,
I’ve lost count f the posts on here and Pam’s facebook page from people calling to kill Muslims, including some calling for all Muslims to be killed [ one memorably suggesting “inc women and children”

Platopus
Platopus
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Any calls as you say are in self defense and response to the Islam compulsion to jihad murder attacks.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Platopus

Platypus.. Self defence? , have you been attacked by Muslims often yourself.?

mztore
mztore
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

And just what do you think the mudslimes are telling their followers to do. That isn’t a suggestion either, it is a command that they do it to all non-mudslimes and Jews.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  mztore

So , you’re saying that you’re no better than Muslim extremists.
Did all Christians follow the IRAs instructions.
And what percentage of Muslims make hose commands and what percentage follow them. And why wouldn’t we think that Mahou is doing this professionally [ as her day job]

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

If she is, she’d be doing us all a favor.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

And would victims of a terrorist attack inspired by her, agree with you. Because that’s exactly what the Russian fake news campaign is trying to do , Sow any sort of social dissention , They don’t care about which ideology as long as it’s decisive. And on that basis Pam and mahou have probably already got their Orders of Lenin.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

There’s so much wrong with what you said, it’s not even worth the time.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Grasping at straws is your strong point, sinking into the mud is another.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

And being honest and open about your professional status here, isn’t yours.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

My status has nothing to do with my comments.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Yes it does, If you are a paid provocateur reader should be entitled to know. In the same way that political lobbyists should be declared. Especially in the current climate of Russian intrusion into other countries’politics by exactly the sort of this you do.
We don’t even know whether you are an individual or just a team of writers somewhere in Moscow [ or Tel Aviv]. Both places with a record of misinformation such as this.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Who is “we”?

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

“Perhaps you mean “who are we”?
I thought you were a professional. Nyet?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Meow.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Is that meow from Bunni or Bobbi?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Meow.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Or perhaps you mean Mooo

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Want to know who it is, not who it are.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I thought a professional like you would have got that right .
But it depends on whether your first language is English or Russian, I suppose. So I’ll be generous and give you marks for trying..
Proshchay.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Thinking is not your strong point, avoid it.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Ed,

Good response in tone and manner – Yes, the Geller ComBox is full of hateful comments. And as it’s the only riposte you could give to defend your earlier post, I will concede many Combox comments here on Geller Report are inflammatory.

As mztore and Platopus have already pointed out, the comments are responses to provocation, do not advocate for unlawful conduct, and do not rise to incitement by definition. But…

No, no, no. It’s not that easy. And with Global Warming putting my porch thermometer at 33F – I’m stuck inside cooling my heels. Pun and polite sarcasm intended.

As to the posts in question: All are expressions of outrage against an infernal, diabolical, and inimical ideology of hate that threatens all of us.

As to the particulars of what orchestrated violence may be done: Bush and his neo-Cons have already thrust us into two recent wars leading to the death of thousands of innocent people. And as much as we would like it to be otherwise – the deliberate and intentional policy of NOT attacking targets and prosecuting our soldiers for doing their jobs has led to a foreseeable and predictable result. Namely far, far more innocent people have died than should have.

And before rushing to judgment – it was the Islamists, mostly state-sponsored, non-state armies (including ours unfortunately) who actually pulled the trigger on most of those deaths. And yes, the majority were Muslim, but all of the victims were ‘minorities’ with respect to the killers.

Put another way: A war against any Islamic threat would kill innocent folks – even if we shot no innocent party – because such a war would unleash the justification for Islam-based violence on apostates, pagans, unbelievers, and ‘people of the book.’ Nonetheless, a straightforward war – such as has been fought in the past – would entail fewer casualties among the innocent than a long, fruitless policy of appeasing terrorists or arming terrorists to fight terrorists or some other futile military policy. According to past experience anyway.

As to your post, it is most ironic in this case, as the victim happens to be a patrons of a Gay nightclub. (Edited, my bad). While some here might want to kill all Muslim children even they were no longer enthralled by the ideology and posed no threat to anyone, it’s a stretch and a half to think we Islamophobes hate Islam because we hate children…

IF I HATED MUSLIM CHILDREN – I WOULD NEVER WANT TO FREE THEM FROM ISLAM … All caps for the lurkers on the thread, not you Ed. But it expresses the sentiment correctly: If I wished evil upon others for no reason, I would wish evil upon them including both visiting the sins of their ideology on them and denying them the benefits of my ideology. Again – If you want to maximize the harm American policy can do to Latin America, support the Left. The Free Lunch and Special Privileges Latin Americans, Illegal migrants, and Mexican-Americans enjoy – at the expense of all Americans including other poor minorities – is temporary. What is a trend for Latins though is an absolute – and horrifying – outcome for the Muslim victims of Islam.

Now back to the main feature:

1. “her website promotes violence” – Nonsense. Truth does not promote violence. It may provoke violence. And violence may be justified if the situation warrants it. But Geller is not promoting (irrational) hate or (ignorant) fear. In other words, she is not promoting ‘Islamophobia’ as defined by the Islamists.

Islamophobia is not responsible for any murders, acid attacks, rapes, or any serious assaults, batteries, humiliations, discrimination, or other act of bigotry. And not just because of any fallacious argument – but because no established pattern of abuse of Muslims exists. We have seen so far – nothing more than hateful comments, bacon, vandalism, and the infamous Finsbury Park assault. (I can think of a few others – but those are even less relevant – as in the Jewish doctor’s case who went out of his mind after a family was slaughtered by terrorists, and he retaliated against innocent Muslims in revenge.)

In fact, it’s the other way round. We have an established pattern of Islamists abusing us with hoaxes and endless stories against ‘backlash’ every time an example of Islam boils over into the ‘Bubble Land’ cyber world occupied by Left-wing Reality Deniers.

Ruling out foreign wars by our own phony leadership – in collaboration with other Islamists including terrorists – all of which is the responsibility of Islamophiles – Islamophobia seems remarkably quiescent and peaceful …

in light of the provocation.

Which brings me directly back to your post Ed. …

It is analogous to excusing the Japanese Empire of its crimes because the Allies used naughty words and propaganda to foment anger and strong emotions against the Japanese Empire in WW2. As with many of my other examples – this too is a real-time provocation by the Atheist Left.

My grandfather served in every battle in the South Pacific. So when my daughter brought home her history textbook and showed her grandmother how the Leftists were blaming the Pacific war on Whitey’s Racism … I literally had to rescue the da*n thing before mom ripped it to shreds. Anyone with an ounce of history would know that such a BIG LIE kinda makes ‘kill ’em all and let God sort ’em out’ pale in comparison.

According to your claim, Islam is excused by virtue of the expression of outrage at the crimes Islam is responsible for.

Worse, you’re claiming that Pamela promotes hate and violence by calling attention to the hate and violence inspired by Islam.

Obviously, this is due to your faith in your own Bubble to provide you with some morally and ethically superior view of reality – when in fact you’re claims are contrary to the living experience of many of us here. And it is much worse than that.

What you’re claiming, essentially, is that those who care about the victims of Islam have no right to defend them or interfere with the Islamization process.

In essence, Ed, you hate and fear people such as myself who are dedicated to stopping the Lefts’ violent policies. At great personal cost. And a lot of time, energy, and material opportunities forsaken.

It gives me no pleasure to warn you, but it is a duty to the victims of Islam I have personally met – whose stories I have shared – and of the many persons I have seen drowning in the Left’s ideological disasters – caught in the flotsam and jetsam of a force they do not understand.

Not that I am warning you of impending violence. I’m sure you’re safe in your bubble. But I am not. My home is far from the front-lines, but I could drive to several ‘fronts’ in a few hours. Not that this is a justification – but it gives one a clarity of purpose and a focus on the stakes involved. My town, my friends, my neighbors can be affected. Many are already – we have illegal flight here as the Latins try to escape the No Go Zones in the Metroplex. This is not the only way to ‘know’ the truth, but when you’ve seen the police literally run to their cars – after refusing to go after an “illegal” rapist – it casts a whole new perspective on one’s duty.

What I am warning you of – is the intrinsic hate and fear emanating from your posts. You’re posts betray an inordinate concern about ‘naughty’ words and forms of expression and a willful blindness to the legitimate concerns of your neighbors.

Which – especially ironic in this case – includes Gays and no doubt many of your fellow travelers on the Atheist Left.

While you enjoy safety and security provided by others – and feel no compulsion to pass that gift forward in exchange for what you owe.

Peace and love to you and yours, Ed. Have a great weekend.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

“1. “her website promotes violence” – Nonsense. Truth does not promote violence. It may provoke violence. And violence may be justified if the situation warrants it. But Geller is not promoting (irrational) hate or (ignorant) fear. In other words, she is not promoting ‘Islamophobia’ as defined by the Islamists”.
Muslims are commanded to lie specifically in the qur’an, there are three open ended instances that allow for muslims to lie constantly.
“The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘Lying is not permitted except in three cases: a man’s speaking to his wife to make her happy; lying at times of war; and lying in order to reconcile between people.’” (Reported by al-Tirmidhi, 1862; he said: it is a hasan hadeeth. See also Saheeh Muslim, 4717)”.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Nice addition.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Dan

A couple of points You mention the Japanese Empire being excused. Well historically Emperor Hirohito was excused. and many Japanese war criminals of the worse kind were excused in exchange for giving their research to the US govt.
And of course Pamela does inspire terrorist action by radical Islamists. You only need to look as her much touted threat from jihadists to kill her.
If they were inspired to that , why wouldn’t you think her writings [ and fan’s comment] wouldn’t have been a factor in inspiring other attacks.
There are about 1.6 billion Muslims . what percentage do you think commit terrorist acts?
Do you blame all for the actions of a few. Should we have advocated violence against all Catholics in response to the IRA.?
To all Americans in response to My Lai, ,agent Orange etc?
Which is appropriate in that at present Western countries are protesting vigorously about Russian use on nerve agent to attack 2 people in London.
Well rightly so, but it seems to have slipped their minds that the CIA planned to use poison cigars to kill Castro. and well the effects of Agent Orange are still causing disastrous problems to children in Vietnam.
And I think in the UN they mentioned Russian downing of the airliner of Ukraine. BUt also forget that the US did exactly the same to an Iranian airliner.. But Izzy here thanks that was OK , somehow because an aircraft from a quite separate country earlier had accidentally fired a missile at the USS Stark
I had questioned whether Izzy was a Nazi ,but this tactic of killing civilians in retaialtion is right out of the Nazi text book.

You contend that Pam tells the truth , You might recall that in court you are required to tell not only the truth, but the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth.
If we put aside cases where I say Pam has not told the truth, she certainly hasn’t told the whole truth. Aliens from another planet arriving and reading Pam would gain the impression that all crimes on Earth are committed by Muslims with the occasional assistance of jews that were guards in concentration camps.
If I’m wrong perhaps you could point me to some of her comments that are otherwise.

I can empathise with your desire to free children from Islam . I would go further and wish to free them from religion of any sort. If they wish to follow some religion, they can explore that matter when they are adults and not so vulnerable to brain washing and indoctrination.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

“Should we have advocated violence against all Catholics in response to the IRA.?” No. Why, because last time I heard, Catholic doctrine doesn’t call for the destruction of it’s enemies the way islam requires it of ALL of it’s followers. If you had paid attention to what Pamela was saying here, you would know that. Instead, you decide to cherry pick what she says to fit whatever twisted agenda you have.

“Agent Orange are still causing disastrous problems to children in Vietnam.” What exactly are you saying, our troops are to blame for that? Are you in Vietnam volunteering your time and money to help those alleged victims? Seriously. Drop the sanctimonious act.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Ed,

Well, I don’t agree obviously, but I like your response. You’re obviously trying to rationalize and argue the points, which is good if not going to criticize others for being emotional.
***
As to excusing the Japanese Empire. I was not referring to the actual amnesty / forgiveness given to the Japanese (all levels from top instigators to war criminals to innocent peasants). I meant that it would be as if we excused them for our naughty words.

We used terrible language, and racist characterizations during the war. My point is that the crimes of the Japanese Empire were still crimes – no matter what we said – in the middle of the ordeal.

As in a heated argument – both sides can hurl unkind and unfair words – and also commit unkind and unfair acts – and the words do not excuse the prior actions before the argument nor the actions during the argument.

And if one side only uses kind and fair words – they may earn brownie points with Santa Claus – whom you do not believe in …

But they likely will convince many folks that the other party – the party doing unkind and unfair actions – has the ‘high moral ground.’

The idea that it is otherwise – that the moral ground remains with the kind and fair speaker is a construct of the West. The idea that the kind and fair speaker wins – regardless of the underlying argument OR the content of what the argument is intended to defend is a Newly concocted perversion of the older Western thought about the rules / tactics of debate.
***
“Pamela does inspire terrorist action by radical Islamists.”

Is she responsible for the Pulse Night Club attack? I don’t think so. Certainly she has made herself a target, but so what? We are all targets.
***
“what percentage do you think commit terrorist acts?”

Why do you think that number is relevant? I do not hesitate b/c it is a small percentage – I hesitate to give a number b/c I don’t know the number.

All Islamic terrorists justify their attacks by reference to Islam’s ideology and foundational texts. Few Islamic leaders oppose this – for the simple reason that they too become victims.

In other words they take their inspiration from the ideology.

According to this logic: Muslims who reject the attacks incite violence and are responsible for being attacked. That’s also known as blaming the victim.

But setting that aside: Muslims cannot argue with the terrorists on the basis of the basic text – what some would call the ‘plain reading.’

As to percentages – the overwhelming majority of Muslims support the violent interpretation of the text according to various polls. These too can be dismissed though since no one wants to get their head cut off.
***
“Do you blame all for the actions of a few.”

In other words: Do you blame all Germans today for the actions of the National Socialists in the past? I assume not.

But we do. And so do you. Germans are held to collective account for the actions of their ancestors, and socialism is not.

All of the examples you offered are specific cases – not one of which was ideologically motivated.

Even the IRA was not acting in response to a particular political ideology. The troubles were about politics, but not necessarily socialism v. communism v. democracy v. a republic. And there were an elements of economic and legal discrimination.

In the case of Islam – we have an ideology that defines me as a pig – and you too btw.

The fact that the ideology does not inspire 1.6 billion Muslims to commit violence is Not Relevant. It does Not Matter.

For example: Not all Nasties committed War Crimes. Does that excuse the Nasties of what they committed?

We have here a consistent misunderstanding – or refusal to understand – the distinction between a people with a culture and a language and history that deserves a deminimus level of respect for its unique attributes – for example the Yanomami – a tribe of the South American rainforest v. an ideology such as the Unabomber Manifesto.

Islam is an ideology – not a race, not a people, not even a government or a corporation. It is an idea to which most of its followers are born – and cannot escape due to particularly and peculiarly unique attributes.

***
“she certainly hasn’t told the whole truth” …

Nonsense Ed. This doesn’t even pass the laugh test.

Space Aliens who came to Earth and read nothing but Pioneer Woman http://thepioneerwoman.com/

would think the whole planet is a middle class, crime free, trouble free safe space occupied by people who – For Absolutely No Reason At All – were obsessed with relieving the stress of a stress free existence by the consumption of comfort food.

***

In court … a witness is not required to provide the ‘whole’ truth and ‘nothing but the truth’ …

If that were required, virtually every witness would go to jail.

That comes from an aspiration statement made during the ceremony to inspire the participants to provide as much detail as they can recall – AND to withhold personal animus, bias, gossip, and speculation.

It does not always work. And professional attorneys will do their best to correct errors and omissions. But no goes to prison b/c it’s not ‘required.’

What is required, in theory, is to not lie in court. That’s an important distinction.

***

Pamela is not in court. At least not on her website. She’s not a witness. She is not a plaintiff or a defendant.

Incitement to violence and defamation are both crimes in the USA. If Pamela committed either crime once – much less on a regular basis as you are alleging – the defenders of terrorism would be on her like tics on a dog.

What I suspect you want – a laundry list of crimes of non-Muslims – inspired by their religions is rather hard to come up with. And I’m not sure you would want to see it if it could be compiled. The list would be far shorter than Islam’s and it would include names with which both of us are unfamiliar.

***

My contention …

Pamela’s posts are consistent with reality.

Like many conservatives and other throwbacks, I like to say the sun rises in the east. Which means an obvious truth.

But the sun neither rises nor falls. As we know, the Earth spins and creates the illusion of rising.

And the sun does not appear to rise in the east – unless one is near the equator – and even then only on certain days. And depending on the definition of the ‘horizon’ or the ‘face’ of the sun, and ‘rising’ and ‘east’ … maybe it never rises in the east.

Somehow some folks are bound and determined to quibble with a simple reality – like the sun rising in the east – but what do they want? Do they want us to believe the sun rises in the west? That would be a condition that has never occurred – and never will.

***

Meanwhile, back at the farm, I have personally met victims of Islam. My CIO was actually imprisoned in Egypt for three weeks while on a trip to obtain a permanent exemption from his mandatory military service requirement. Happily a good Samaritan appeared to pay the bribes needed to spring him, and get his paperwork completed. He believes – and so do I – that being a Christian was a big factor in his arrest. … That’s just the most recent example.

But it is not ‘Islam’ or ‘terrorism’ that convinces me that Pamela tells the truth. I have a long and involved history with government, politics, criminals, and so on – all very sordid and complex. Some of which I’ve alluded to already. And none of that is consistent with your view.

Actually the only experience I have had that is consistent with your view – is that yes it is common for folks living in safe, secure, Western bubbles to believe that the only monsters out there in the great wide world are those less fortunate members of their own communities who have to live with the – often violent and degrading – consequences of the policies they force upon the rest of us.

***
“her comments that are otherwise”

What comments are you looking for? The Vast Amish Terrorist Conspiracy? She doesn’t cover communist terrorists. She doesn’t cover Left-wing terror.

You’re best bet is to try pinning her down on speculation about terrorists we have not yet vetted – such as the Las Vegas shooter. Isis claimed him, but the jury is still out.

***
“free” the children

Ha. Yes. The children of Malmo Sweden and Rotherham UK are so free thanks to their government’s Atheist religion.

At least the authorities have one thing right. Atheism, when it becomes the State’s Established Religion is morally equivalent to Islam.
***
Have a great weekend Ed.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Dan

Pam inspire terrorists? Well as a statement of history, yes. The has been full of reports of being a victim of jihad., The people who were charged certainly weren’t targeting her for her fashion sense, or Daughters’online profiles.
So did she have a role in any specific attacks,? That would assume that only one specific motivator existed. And there would be no way of mathematically attributing a 5 age . But ifI was an ISIS recruiter , I would be showing would be’s Pam’s site as and saying ‘Read this , this is what the West will do to you”
AS to the”The whole truth”I don’t what passes for a justice system in the USA, although watching US TV court room dramas I find it pretty shocking. but certainly in the British system witnesses must swear to tell the truth , the whole truth and nothing but the truth”at pain of being charged with perjury if shown not to.
And Pam’s modus is to report some incident, any incident and suggest that Muslims did it { London hi rise fire, Bourke st car attack, London car fire, etc etc. But when later this is found to be not true. Pam’s moved onto another ‘attrocity’
And is Pam a witness. ?
Well of course in reality, she just gives opinions, but sadly there are many people here who mistakenly assume she is a source of factual information. And never check independent sources.
Still, not surprising , the people here aren’t looking for factual information, The just want to engage in a conga line of suckholes with others who have their bigotry as a starting point and like to be told it’s OK
And interesting point that doesn’t seem tot get discussed. Is Judaism a religion or a race.? or Both?
But if it’s a race, and Jewishness being passed down maternally seems to define it as race. We have a whole country established on the basis of racism
A lot like apartheid Sth Africa
Malmo , Rotherham , the French caliphate , no go zones etc. Have you personally seen any of this or do you take Pam’s word for it. I’ve certainly been recently to areas defined as “no go zones’ and there was no such thing.
And I suspect most here have never been. I recall a while ago Pam’s breathlessly talking about a city shut down, but someone commented they lived there and the ‘shut down’ was a single bus stop bypassed
Regarding moral equivalence, It looks here to me that The posters here are little different to radical Muslims,Same product different brand.
The weekend was perfect thank you. Weather , wine, food and not an amen to be heard.. I hope you made the most of yours.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Ed,

Yes, Pam had a role in the Garland attack. But her role was
victim.

No, they were not targeting her for wearing Western clothes.
But they were targeting her for defending the right of women to wear Western clothes.

Her daughters … I’m not Mr. Social Media, and I generally
prefer to leave kids out of it. Doxing her girls though was – IMHO – a particularly disgusting Dox. Which makes me think of my handle. … One of the reasons I am using ‘knight’ as a Fig Leaf signaling a desire for privacy is to protect my family, my friends, my associates, my former clients and tenants – and EVEN my enemies.

I know how vile and ugly and dangerous Leftists can be from
first-hand experience.

And ironically – this is also why I do not use a VPN or any
high-end software to ‘hide’ my IP address from surveillance – only standard, off the shelf retail software to stop viral attacks. I do not want to give those who may be interested any reason to think I am a threat or hiding anything. (And yes, if we were in a bar downing some brewskis – I would tell you all about it –and you would say I’m full of excrement – and we’d buy another round. LOL) But reality is just like that you know. Complicated.

“ISIS recruiter” … Back when ISIS was still ISIS, and their territory was growing … A story came through the Chaldean Church and some aid agencies (Samaritan’s purse perhaps, I’m not sure). A squad caught four little girls – all Christians – and raped them – and then beheaded them.

Video footage, and some stills, was circulated. Provenance
of the media is sketchy of course. According to the Christian groups the media was posted by ISIS recruiters to ‘inspire’ Muslims to join ISIS.

Sorry – but the video appears real, though it could be fake, and if the story is consistent with numerous other sources, but it could be
fake. Either way, nothing Pamela does can top this.

Pamela may provoke ISIS to target her.

But nothing Pamela does not do will stop them from committing violence.

The ‘recruitment’ argument goes way back. Have we not discussed this? Apologists for the dangerous and violent Islamists always speak of ‘recruitment’ to challenge us to do nothing. But we have to do something. What should we do?

The ‘recruitment’ argument is similar to the ‘Don’t enforce the law – and the criminals will stop robbing people’ argument.

“at pain of being charged with perjury if shown not to.” … and how many times does that happen?

I did pro-bono family law for about 2.5 years. Every witness who had the capacity to lie – lied. My clients did not lie – but only because I prevented it. And the rest were too flippin’ stupid to know what a “lie” is.

When you’re dealing with the folks who hardly know how many
fingers they have … these courtroom TV dramas have nothing in common with the reality of it.

“And Pam’s modus is to report some incident, any incident and
suggest that Muslims did it” … Fair enough when she’s wrong. But what about the times she’s right? If anything, she leaves too many on the table.

“And is Pam a witness?” … No that’s the point. She usually
just aggregates reports on a specific topic. That’s what she does. And she expresses her outrage as we go through the same, predictable kabuki theater – where those of us concerned about it play the monster, the victims deserved it, and the media and politicians aid and abet the perpetrators. Which btw – was once a crime under English common-law.

“many people here who mistakenly assume she is a source of
factual information. And never check independent sources.” … What independent sources?

If you want to make yourself crazy, scour the net for sources. All of them are Left-leaning, and all of them make it difficult to track Bias-related crimes and terrorism committed by their pet thugs.

Yes there are Hindus who commit serious crimes, for example.
I know because a global Christian charity sends a high-quality report on Hindu bias crime against Christians. But the same report also points out that Hindus are frequently victims of bias crime – both Hindu on Hindu and Muslim on Hindu.

Sources out of the Middle East and Southeast Asia are even more unreliable.

Pamela relies on the major Left-leaning news sources – all of
which are essentially the same in quality and bias. Her only input is 1. Picking up the story, and 2. Reacting to it.

You don’t have to read Geller report you know. You could go find a site covering Christian Bias-crimes or Right-wing Bias-crimes or, heck, find one on Buddhist Bias-crimes. But Geller is offering one website to aggregate news about one type of crime. That’s what she does.

Newsflash Ed: She’s not a Global Corporation with far flung
reporters all over the planet. She just gets her news from those sources.

If there is something wrong with her opinion or analysis – that’s on her.

But as to the sources – she uses the same ones most of us
would use in the West.

“Still, not surprising , the people here aren’t looking for factual information, The just want to engage in a conga line of suckholes with others who have their bigotry as a starting point and like to be told it’s OK”

A rather unbecoming assessment. One which I ought to just
throw right back at you.

Let me remind you: You’re speaking to someone who has witnessed the victims of literally hundreds of crimes – with nary a police report. Over one hundred crimes by Illegals – and not one police report. And this isn’t just stealing chewing gum. Rape. Baby rape. Child abuse. Domestic violence. The whole nine-yards.

And the cops do not dare touch any of it.

And the media does not give a crap.

And the politicians do not give a crap.

And the Ivory tower, Liberals living in their Safe Space bubbles do not give a crap.

And if someone gripes about it – Oh, wow, ‘you’re a rayyycisst.’

And let’s be clear – in terms of Political Correctness …

If I set up a website to start aggregating news stories to confirm what I already know about the hidden crime wave in this country … uh, well, I was about to say the cops would be sent to check by underwear … but, oh, right, … that’s already happened.

So I come here to follow what the conga line of suckhole bigots creating the Islamic threat are doing to push the Islamic thug space into the West. They want to spread the violence to more unsuspecting folks in quiet, nice, former Bubbles… and it is coming here. The Islamic Violence Collaborators are the fellow travelers (and conga suckholes of Texas) who created the mess in Dallas and Fort Worth, which I have seen for myself. I want to keep track of their progress in America. There’s not much more I can do than that.

“And interesting point that doesn’t seem tot get discussed. Is
Judaism a religion or a race? or Both?”

Who cares?

“But if it’s a race, and Jewishness being passed down
maternally seems to define it as race. We have a whole country established on the basis of racism” … Israel I assume?

Not a nice way to frame it. That remark oozes with innuendos
– none of them nice. Do you want to disavow anything Ed?

Technically, Judaism is a religion. There a number of sects and denominations of course – just like Atheism. And any other religion. It’s possible to convert in some, and not in others.

Jews are also an ethnic group, and consist of a number of tribes.

Race, of course, is a political construct. And though we have always divided ourselves for as long as we recall, ‘race’ is a modern version. I’m always surprised by Westerners who don’t seem to grasp that Tribal divisions among ‘races’ totally indistinguishable without DNA – are the fundamental ‘racial’ divisions. A quick look at a linguistic map of Brazil or Indonesia will give one a new appreciation for the variety of ‘races.’

Which ‘race’ Jews belongs to – or does not belong to – is above
my pay grade.

Most countries were established by tribe, race, religion, or
natural boundaries. Nations in the classic sense – reading ancient documents – were generally identified by language. Everyone then understood that the Nations were formed of Tribes – among other larger and smaller divisions. Tribes would squabble and fight – but they would coalesce to repel an larger external threat.

Today – largely thanks to the era of colonialism and European empires – we have many ‘unnatural’ nations formed by imposing a
political frame onto traditional Nations and Tribes. These toss natural enemies together and separate allies. They discriminate against some – and give a few tribes awesome, and unfair, advantages.

And then into this mix … We Westerners watching our TV’s and
reading blogs prance in – and apply post-Modern, Cultural Marxist ideology and wonder .. ‘Why can’t we just all get along like we’ve been Christians for 2000 years, but I’m going to leave out Jesus cause I don’t know my history?’ …

“A lot like apartheid Sth Africa” … You’re kidding right?

Israel exists because the Jewish people have been trying to
establish a ‘safe space’ – not unlike your safe space, Ed – where they can walk the streets and be safe and be Jews. After WW2, it became obvious to some that only a nation state that could defend itself would serve as a safety valve to prevent another attempt to exterminate all of them.

Europe was no longer safe – and it isn’t today – and the war had delivered the real estate on which Israel sits into the hands of the
British. Yes, I know this is short… but for the encyclopedia version get a thick book. There’s a number of them out there.

What is so exasperating is that there is Absolutely Nothing
special about Israel.

All of its neighbors had once been part of the Ottoman Empire.
ALL of those nations were carved out up the Ottoman Empire – and carved up by – the British and its allies in WW1.

Why is Kuwait sitting on a giant field of oil? (British Petroleum) Why were the Kurds carved up? (To screw ‘em) What was the point of Saudi Arabia? Good question. Maybe Lawrence was gay? I don’t know. But the whole mess was deliberate and intentional.

The idea that the Jews should have a piece of the pie too is
no more ludicrous than any of the other ‘nations’ carved out of the ME.

What would be fair would be to give Egypt back to the Copts,
give the Arabian peninsula to the Arabs, let the Persians keep Iran, let the Kurds have a state – so long as they behave – and try to calm Syria down. But that’s not going to happen because Islam does not allow any peace treaties over 10 years long.

“Malmo , Rotherham , the French caliphate , no go zones etc.
Have you personally seen any of this or do you take Pam’s word for it. I’ve certainly been recently to areas defined as “no go zones’ and there was no such thing.”

Yep. Stop 6 Fort Worth. Ward 5 Houston. East Dallas. And
several in California. I once took the wrong exit in Cali, and drove into a riot in a No Go Zone in San Jose – nothing on the radio or TV. What we saw would likely make most folks piss themselves. My passengers were screaming.

It happened again – many years later in East Dallas. Drove
right into a riot. It SHOULD have been all over the bloody radio! There was nothing. Even Fox the next morning said there was a ‘protest’ over a police shooting. The Dallas Morning Pravda only mentioned a shooting – the cops shot a perp, and no one was killed. …

Ohhhh, riiiight. Nothing happened … but the whole damned
establishment in Dallas decided to move the Opera House and everything else down there … just b/c – I guess because the Evil Whitey Crazy Rays from the Vast RW Nut Conspiracy made ‘em do it. Yeah. Yeah. Riiight.

No – because that night was an opera – and some of the
wealthiest citizens in Dallas saw TRUTH. And the conga line of Libtard bigoted bloodsuckers over there running Dallas into Detroit
space knew they could not HIDE it if they left all the amenities down there.The fairgrounds and the zoo are still there, but I have it on good authority that their days are numbered.

Which says nothing about my own experiences as a pro-bono
attorney for the folks living in these ‘No Go Zones.’

Can fools drive threw ‘em? Yeah. But I would not even let you go down to some of these places on a warm night. I would not want your blood on my conscience.

“a city shut down” … Yeah. I forget which city did the buses. But so what? Dallas and FW both have bus and rail services which are
active and heavily used during commuting hours. … But for some reason those buses and trains just don’t do certain lines at certain hours, and certain ‘hoods don’t get any service at all. Gosh, that’s a mystery. But … only to someone with no idea what’s going on.

“The posters here are little different to radical Muslims,Same product different brand.”

Pretty extreme of you. Since I am anti-child rape, I am equivalent to the child raping Illegals who get away raping children because
they flee the country, get a new skin, return, hide in a sanctuary city,and start over? Sad, Ed, sad.

Do you believe cops just become cops to shoot unarmed citizens minding their own business?

“The weekend was perfect thank you. Weather , wine, food and
not an amen to be heard.. I hope you made the most of yours.”

Glad you and yours Ed, and thank you.
***

Yes, had a good weekend. Would have been better, but a cold
front came in. We hit 34F – that’s 1C for you – which is crazy weather around here. Interrupted our plans, but we worked around it.

Happy Divine Mercy Sunday, btw, Ed.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Dan

I’m sure East Dallas must have some attractions. And I can empathise because I wouldn’t want to go there either , Or to be honest , anywhere twixt LA and NY. But that wasn’t the ‘no go zones’ Pam talks about . Have you actually been to Malmo or France and seen these no go zones your self? Seen the “civil war “in Sweden?
I have sat in places marked as no go zones in Paris and felt totally at ease. In fact there are few better places to be.
And my next door neighbour visited Sweden at Xmas to see her son who lives there and laughed at the no go allegations.
And as for fact checking… it doesn’t take much when Pam shows a “no Go zone “poster supposedly in Sweden { and then later said to be in France,] and the posters are in English.. well alarm bells should ring.

And media owners being lefties?. I’d hardly call Rupert Murdoch a lefty.
But any pic Pam uses is easily checked. Click on the jpeg and a drop box comes up “search for picture on google” and you can bring up all the other places it has been used.
Do you do this.?
I do and e.g i found some pics are “stock Getty images”
One a “knife wielding terrorist” was just a riot policeman.
Another “blood in the streets in France”was just sheep being slaughtered.
Yet another of a ” 4 yo girl raped in France”was the picture of a women who had been molested [ raped] by a US politician.
So it is important to check , and to doubt.
Even your Christian disciple Thomas doubted
And if you feel the media lie , why would you assume that Pam is any different.
She might not be a corporation, although she did have a half share in a dodgy car yard, but she’s doing quite well financially from all this.. If you want one word that you can completely trust in her page its the one “DONATE”

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

How many records are there of muslims actually killing non muslims?

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

So what’s your point.
I’m sure if you are asking something it’s a rhetorical question.
One could ask how many records are there of US military killing Muslims?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

One could do any number of things, you chose to avoid questions you are too dim to understand.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

How may instances in the qur’an and the news today, do muslims call for the deaths of all non muslims?

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

About a similar number of instances in the Old Testament calling for death to unbelievers, adulterers, gays and the like.
Donald T might not have survived in those days

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

That’s not a reach though. If this lawsuit actually succeeds, that Pandora’s box is opened.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Pandora’s box is open. If it were shut, the case would not be necessary.

Vlad
Vlad
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

comment image

So, how many m oo s l i m e s got killed by the “Geller Army”? (Hint, the answer is between -1 and +1)
How many people got killed by ISIS and the followers of the death cult since 9/11?

As of March 25 2017, 30,499 DEADLY ISLAMIST ATTACKS SINCE 9/11, probably 1000’s more since last year.
It’ the “religious sport” of the m o o s l i m e ‘s world.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/30499-deadly-islamist-attacks-since-911/news-story/a7470387384a8ac3f53fd4cd1479cdac?nk=880ce5aef607e74f051f49c26e726ce3-1523093668
Batman slap some sense into FAKE, he’s sooo stupid.

RetiredNavyphotog
RetiredNavyphotog
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Nazi troll with “0” upvotes.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago

As I have said before up votes here would be like winning the Miss Nazi party title at the 1933 Munich Rally.
I seé you’ve been busy with 36,000 comments.. Have you solved the Musil problem yet with all that effort. or just haven’t got a life..

BTW you weren’t on the Vincennes were you?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Then muslims can be sued for the 109 hate statements in the qur’an. Then there is welfare fraud, which you seem to be familiar with as well as being stupid in a public place.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Mahou

And what we really want to know … is are you a professional poster [ employed by Russia or Mossad ] or are you just obsessively compulsive. There you are another 38 posts racked up . I presumed you are paid a piece rate.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Who is we?

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

You can start with me.
I suppose you have all this time as its still below zero in Moscow.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

You are too predictable and trivial to really bother with, go to breitbart , it is for rino’s like you.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Ah Bribe-art

I see in your profile you are a follower.of Breibart. Was that because you agreed with Milo’s comments of sex between older men and under age boys?
Oddly for a collection of people always carrying on a about paedophilia in Musiims, they were pretty quite about that.

So come on , ‘fess up. Are you a professional ?. Does Pam worry? “Oh Jackie , Claudio , Margo, Olivia. i’m worried about Mahou, I’m sure she’s planning a takeover of my Hate-islam business. I think she’s tempted by the Millions I make from it . She should get her own group to hate, I’ve build this market up and no one is going to muscle in.
She can go and start her own hate Amish , or hate Eskimo website. I was hoping to leave this empire all to you”

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

What are you covering up by not openly declaring your support for the muslim brotherhood?

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Bingo!

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I don’t particularly “support “Muslim Brotherhood”Much as I don’t “support”either side of US politics. But the Brotherhood won a democratic election in Egypt and it’s not up to you or the US to approve or not.
Your past record of disagreeing with democratically elected governments didn’t seem to work out well.

So, professional or amateur? You’ve got a few hundred followers , They are entitled to know who they are following.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Who are you to decide what anyone who “follows” any one else is entitled to? You are entitled to a swift kick.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

And presumably you think America can decide who other countries can democratically elect.
Is “swift kick” your euphemism for regime change?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

There is no “presumably” in you being an idiot, it is a certainty.

Ed Nantes
Ed Nantes
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

So presumable’s out of the way , You do think America has the right to decide and approve or not the governments that other countries can elect.
Why not , Jim Austin here has already said he thinks America does..

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago
Reply to  Ed Nantes

Why would I care what Jim Austin thinks?

Lynn D
Lynn D
6 years ago

I hope this lawsuit ends up being HUGE…There are a lot of survivors of jihad massacres that could also turn this into an international class action..

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Lynn D

They have no chance to win. Previous cases have all been thrown out either ahead of trial or, in the case of a lawsuit against the PLO, on appeal.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

You really have no clue what you are talking about. It is truly laughable what you come up with. Do you really think anyone here believes what you say?

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago

This could get very interesting. First, “Fakebook” CEO Mark Zuckerberg will be grilled by two congressional committees soon. It will not go well. His smart ass attitude and his mistaken notion that he posseses some sort of amazing powers of a personality of persuaion will result in an embarrassing smackdown.

But also, by this logic, the survivors of the Benghazi attack now will have the same case to make as the Pulse survivors. After all, President Obhammud and Secretary of State Shrillary declared a video as being the reason for that attack. Right?

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago

Both will be thrown out because of 47 US 230.

Achmed Mohammedan
Achmed Mohammedan
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Our little aemoreira1981 is back to playing “make-believe” and she’s in one of her favorite rolls of pretend lawyer. That’s a good little girl, aemoreira1981.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

WTF law school did you flunk out of? 47 US Code 230 is “Private blocking and screening of offensive material”. This sh*t has already been made public. I have heard of missing the point but you win the blue ribbon.

BTW, what have I told you about drinking before noon?

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

Drinking? Hell, she has to be shooting up some pretty good sh*t to come up with that kind of far flung garbage.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Those cases have NOTHING to do with that statute you mentioned. Stop spreading total lies.

Dave Lawson
Dave Lawson
6 years ago

Great work !

MZTYPLCK
MZTYPLCK
6 years ago

Ridiculous!
Better they should sue the religion of Islam! (for promoting this type of behavior)
Where was the gay outrage when the shooters wife got off scot free? I hear crickets.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
6 years ago
Reply to  MZTYPLCK

I hear nothing. Both entities are at war with God.

MZTYPLCK
MZTYPLCK
6 years ago

How about a civil claim against the shooters wife, a la O.J. Simpson.
ahhh……gays dont read this website or comments that are anti islam. They apparently love and respect their oppressors, even the ones that slaughter them. Must be some kind of S & M thing.

mztore
mztore
6 years ago
Reply to  MZTYPLCK

That is what I thought after reading there was a law suit….she should be held accountable, even if the jury didn’t think so. She knew what was going on, and did nothing.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  mztore

The jury there said that the wrong law was invoked. That’s why they acquitted.

mztore
mztore
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Never did read a lot about it, and I’m no longer watching the msm news, so I know I’ve missed stuff. Thanks for the info.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago
Reply to  MZTYPLCK

Most of my Gay colleagues and friends make California Republicans look like Libtards … but then I live in east Texas.

;-)))

I’m old enough to remember when Gays could take a joke – were not ‘down’ with every Lefty cause – and were not (generally) serfs on the Gay Mafia plantation. While the Gay community always had its Leftists – it seems the AIDS epidemic in the 80s more or less terminated the non-Leftist Gay community. Albeit I’ve always known Gays who were not ‘Dupes’ (to use Paul Kengor’s term), they have almost always been ‘Closet’ non-Leftists.

And no – the irony is not lost on anyone who is a non-Leftist.

Shuali
Shuali
6 years ago

Which court will preside over this case? The danger here is that Obama holdovers will prevail and the case will go to a kangaroo court. It surely is an important case.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  Shuali

Good! This case is litigation jihad and frivolous.

DemocracyRules
DemocracyRules
6 years ago

Good Summary of Evidence Showing FBI Behind 2015 ISIS Terror Attack in Garland Texas
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/evidence-emerges-fbi-behind-2015-isis-attack-texas/

Logic PrObe
Logic PrObe
6 years ago

They probably helped in the co-ordination of it too.

Robin Rosenblatt
Robin Rosenblatt
6 years ago

I just met three of the CEO’s and two of them had retruned to their countries to do major business deals and they did not even know that shortly Islam was going to take over Germany, France and England. There are groups that will fight back that means civil war or guerrilla war. So what ever they invest they will lose it.

Thomas Faddis
Thomas Faddis
6 years ago

It’s a start!

WM1
WM1
6 years ago

Why they aren’t being prosecuted as an accessory to the carnage we’ve witnessed in this attack (and many others) where a direct connection can be made between their sharing videos, tweets, sermons of imams preaching hatred, jihadist how-to manuals, etc. I don’t understand.

aemoreira1981
aemoreira1981
6 years ago
Reply to  WM1

Because vicarious liability has been outlawed by Congress. You can’t get rid of everything. Even without that to consider, you have 47 US 230 as an absolute block unless one can prove active support through active promotion by that social media site.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  aemoreira1981

Stop mixing psych meds, MAN! Get a hold of yourself.

♠InvidiaAbsit(The800LbGorilla)
♠InvidiaAbsit(The800LbGorilla)
6 years ago

Awesome! I hope they give them a great big dose of humility. I know it’s probably a pipe dream, but this is a popcorn moment if I ever saw one.

Dan Knight
Dan Knight
6 years ago

Good point. And I think it would be a valid defense … but for the fact that these guys allegedly have been deleting videos warning about the dangerous videos. … That looks a lot like ‘incitement’ to me, and likely a bunch of other crimes related to those who collaborate with criminals.

Reverse the process: What if we had BOOGLE – the Website for Right-Wing Nuts, Bigots, and Neo-Nazis – providing a platform for sharing all sorts of elements for actual violence against Leftists, Atheists, Muslims, and/or the Permatanned? And they deliberately deleted Content Providers Accounts, Content Posts, and Comments resisting the violence?

We know the results would be totally different – and the Leftists would be screeching about ‘distinctions’ – and why their case is different.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Knight

Yes. It works only for the leftists/muslims

aebe
aebe
6 years ago

Stretching… But given the politicisation of FB , it might work .

Validate your 2nd Amendment Rights….. Carry !

GR Arnold
GR Arnold
6 years ago

I hope they win this lawsuit.

Moya McNulty
Moya McNulty
6 years ago

I use Facebook – mainly coz there are people all over the world – friends of mine, who I have no other contact with – but for God’s sake, this is INSANE !! What did they THINK (?????) that no one is going to MIND if they encourage and support those
MURDERERS. WE should hold their feet to the fire – WE ARE ALL GOING TO LEAVE FACEBOOK, UNLESS AND UNTIL
THEY CHANGE THEIR WAYS – AND PAY COMPENSATION ! I’m DEADLY SERIOUS. A worldwide campaign of FORCE.

R. Arandas
R. Arandas
6 years ago

Facebook has sided or indirectly enabled radical Islam one time too many. I hope this move will manage to push for some change.

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!