[ April 30, 2024 ]
[the_ad id=”90513″]
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The fight against terrorism and hate speech has to be a joint one. The government and security services are doing everything they can and it is clear that social media companies can and must do more.
By “hate speech” the egregious May doesn’t mean the hatred against Jews and other kuffar that is preached in mosques. No, she means opposition to jihad terror, which she has long branded as “hate speech,” when she banned me from the country and on other occasions. So when she says “the fight against terrorism and hate speech has to be a joint one,” she is saying that “the fight against jihad and those who oppose jihad is a joint one.” And now she is trying to get social media companies to shut down my colleagues and me.
Story continues below advertisement
“Exclusive: Google and social media companies could be prosecuted if they show extremist videos,” by Christopher Hope and Laura Hughes, Telegraph, March 24, 2017:
Google, Facebook and other internet companies could be prosecuted if they do not stop extremist videos from being seen on their websites by people in Britain, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.
Ministers are considering a new law which would mean Google – which owns YouTube – and other social media sites like Facebook and Twitter can be prosecuted if they allow such videos to be disseminated.
Theresa May, the Prime Minister, made clear her displeasure at internet companies that publish extremist content on Friday, saying “the ball is in their court” over taking action.
Google publicly apologised this week after the growing scandal over extremist videos on YouTube led to a series of companies pulling their adverts from the internet giant.
Google, which owns the video sharing website YouTube, and other social media sites have an agreement to take down extremist content within 24 hours when they are alerted to it.
But ministers are worried that this still allows the videos to be viewed thousands of times before they are taken down.
However ministers in the Home Office are now looking at a new law to force the websites to take down content immediately or face court action.
Officials are trying to work out how the law can be enforced in the UK given that many films that can be seen in the UK are hosted on foreign websites.
One source said: “We want to see them take on their responsibility. The problem with the law is in itself we can do what we can but these are global companies.”
The Home Office’s talks with the internet companies are being led by Baroness Shields, who as Joanna Shields was a former Facebook executive.
The news came as Mrs May’s spokesman said that “social media companies can and must do more”.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The fight against terrorism and hate speech has to be a joint one. The government and security services are doing everything they can and it is clear that social media companies can and must do more.
“Social media companies have a responsibility when it comes to making sure this material is not disseminated and we have been clear repeatedly that we think that they can and must do more. We are always talking with them on how to achieve that
“The ball is now in their court. We will see how they respond.”…
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding.Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.
Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
46 Comments
7 years ago
And speaking of joints…WTF have you been smoking Theresa…camel dung? Wearing the enemies head dress, in your own country? Dam women the thought of kissing hairy Arab ass must get you all hot and bothered.
7 years ago
Reply to
Sillywilly
I recall the great Maggie Thatcher wearing a light hair scarf, aboard a British tank. She wore it because she was classy. This old bag, May though, has neither class not patriotism.
7 years ago
Media, Left/Liberal Loons in UK/canada/America are paid by saudi/OIC funded lobbyists and hence support jihadi
immigration.
And the corrupt pro-jihadi media will not even report some
of the crimes like this http://tinyurl.com/p8rdp7w
7 years ago
Hate speech, like, “Allahu Akbar” ? That is hate speech. It keeps coming up in murder cases around the world.
7 years ago
Reply to
Dr. Doomsday
I think Theresa May would remind you that burning cars, rape, beheading, and bullying are all just protected cultural expression, and that we should all rejoice in “sharing.”. All these people are past being able to see or think.
7 years ago
Yep….the hate speech comes solely from the Sharia desiring Muslims who openly go to parts of London, and call for Sharia and the destruction of kuffars, the UK, USA, Israel, in the name of Allah. But that’s not hate speech is it, Mrs May !!!!
7 years ago
Reply to
Jimmy was a Koranderthal
Agree in part. I don’t have a problem with tackling hate speech if it is applied and defined equitably. What is incredible is that surely Britain already has laws that cover harassment, intimidation, incitement to violence, defamation and discrimination, including religious discriminatiion, etc. Surely any other legislation must only serve to silence criticism and create protected classes of citizens. Guess who will be protected!
7 years ago
Reply to
purplej
Absolutely agree. When we saw the likes of Anjem Choudhry and other groups calling for the destruction of specific countries, calling for police to go to Hell etc, this was quite clearly an attempt to incite violence and should have been dealt with, and not overlooked…
7 years ago
Hate speech is truth…. they wish to silence truth
7 years ago
What is it called when two muslim men in a mosque bow down and recite verses in the Quran ?
Conspiracy to commit murder.. 
7 years ago
Stupid woman. Phony political hack. Wishy-washy, guilt-ridden, spinally-challenged, mush-mouthed, do-nothing omni-apologist.
7 years ago
Good idea, to have private companies censor content, so government officials don’t have to get their hands dirty by doing it themselves.
7 years ago
Spineless.
7 years ago
Nips, Krauts, Japs, ‘The Hun’, the Jerrys, Commies, Reds…
What was that, Theresa, chopped liver? Humans are not robots, and when the enemy starts killing us in large numbers, we tend to dislike them. We say disparaging things about them. This is unavoidable in times of war. Hate is a waste of energy, but we all do it from time to time.
The tolerance advocated by the Founders had clear limits.
Does Theresa May deny that Islamists have declared war on Britain, and the West?
7 years ago
Reply to
DemocracyRules
DemocracyRule #9
All supposed ‘hate speech’ must be universally replaceable and reversible. If it isn’t, then it’s not logical, and there shall be no illogical law. No lawmaker should even dream of writing law that violates deductive logic.
If the sentence, “I don’t like Muslims” is hate speech, then all parallel sentences must also be hate speech. Logic compels that all these statements must also be hate speech:
“I don’t like Christians”
“I don’t like Jews”
“I don’t like Hindus”
“I don’t like Whites”
“I don’t like blonds”
“I don’t like Nazis”
“I don’t like people who like ice cream”
All these statements must be punished equally under hate law.
7 years ago
Reply to
DemocracyRules
Logically, hate law must also be reversible. If “I like Nazis” is hate speech, then so is:
“I like Blacks”
“I like Jews”
“I like Muslims”
All these statements must be punished under hate law. Is this not absurd?
7 years ago
Reply to
DemocracyRules
Furthermore, according to deductive logic, both these two statements are hate speech:
– “I don’t like Nazis”
– “I like Nazis”
and these two are hate speech:
– “I don’t like people who like ice cream”
– “I like people who like ice cream”
Replace the word with any type of human, and both statements are still hate speech.
7 years ago
Theresa May is a woman who wishes she was a man and had testicles, but if she had testicles, she wouldn’t know what to do with them. She is a traitor and a coward.
7 years ago
Reply to
IzlamIsTyranny
Some people do not understand engineering terms, making it necessary to use others.
7 years ago
Reply to
Mahou Shoujo
Hey, I understand it now……you just said politely that she should go (bleep) herself………funny!
7 years ago
Theresa May is a stupid old dhimmi hag.
7 years ago
The bodies of the victims aren’t even cold yet but the coward-in-chief Theresa May is already apologizing to muslims.
7 years ago
This isn’t a gender thing. Women can be tougher than men against terrorism. There are lots of women leaders speaking out against islam like Pam, Ann, Marie etc.
Theresa May is a weak person with no moral compass and no empathy for the innocent victims.
7 years ago
There are grounds for her to resign.
She’s the PM and the terrorist attack happened on her watch so she has got to go.
7 years ago
She can kiss my German bum.
7 years ago
The fact that she is covering her hair when speaking to Muslim males says it all: gutless and worthless. Marine le Pen has backbone that is not now present in the British politicos.
7 years ago
The hag of islam, Treason May, is more of a whore to islam with every thing she says, the useless kaliphate of not so great britainistine progresses more into the gutter every minute, with her government. They have a mandate from the voters, elections have consequences, enjoy.
7 years ago
allis fubar.
7 years ago
Theresa “May” just get her butt kicked. She should be tarred and feathered, and run out of town.
7 years ago
Stop Saudi Funding of Mosques, full stop. Forgo lobbying money and business interests.
How badly do western countries need Saudi Money that they are willing to sell out their own nation?
Put camera’s in places of Worship and slam any that preach sedition and anti nationalism.
If they don’t believe in freedom and democracy, don’t allow them to use it to destroy DEMOCRACY in YOUR country.
They hide behind free speech, liberty and democratic ideals all the while despising them because ‘God’ has given them the rule book called the Sha’ria.
That rule book came from the Ummad dynasty, the sworn enemies of their Prophet which they have mindlessly been aping for centuries.
Certify Mullahs, reform any holy book that preaches murder, hatred and anti national rhetoric because if it DOES then it’s a political pamphlet and not a holy book. Geddit?
7 years ago
Sharia May does ALL to appease them.
She even wears head gear to AFFIRM that females are INFERIOR and UNCLEAN. That is what a covered head symbolizes.
May, you need to properly wear it. ONLY the OVAL of the face is allowed to show and NO neck.
7 years ago
The fight against terrorism and hate speech will be a tough act to pull off since the one begets the other, in that order.
7 years ago
Just like the MS media is dishonest and disseminates political claims, often to suppress freedom of speech (censorship). Political phrases are often untruthful and misleading.
An Al Jazeera TV news presenter in the picture.
7 years ago
BULLSHIRT, Ms. May! You may preach to us Yanks after you Brits have rid yourselves of the IslamoTangos you have willingly brought into your land.
7 years ago
If you make it “hate speech” to describe your enemy you will never defeat that enemy because you have already elevated that enemy above your citizens. When speaking ill of Islam is hate speech, Islam has already won the fight for your people by your giving in to their ideas. Know your enemy, identify your enemy and describe your enemy to the people, then they will join in fighting your enemy.
7 years ago
How stupid can she get: equating murderous jihad with being allowed to speak about murderous jihad?
7 years ago
I think this is what happens when the normal, God given instinct to nurture, guide, and lead is perverted from its’ intended result by the person being very far from God and His Word.
7 years ago
Personally, I did not care for her in the position of PM. She voted remain, did not she? It appears she is a placater, wishes to placate, some. Many of the elected politicians are of the left mind, they wish to silence speech, otherwise known as opposition. They will silence those who are placid, polite, gentle, and who have been dullened over the years by the politically correct agenda meant to squelch opposing views. As is easily noted, they never admonish those groups they fear.
People will have to become informed and vote differently.
Have not the British people ability to stand up for their rights, to speak up? Do try, please try.
7 years ago
Sharia May is monumentally stupid. She is authoritarian, which is why I never trusted her when she was an incompetent Home Secretary for six years. She has no understanding of what islam is about and probably gets her advice from the local branch of the muslim brotherhood which in the UK is the Muslim Council of Britain.
She cannot understand that she can’t combat islamic terror by prohibiting free speech.
7 years ago
So Great Britain is going to start rounding up all Muslims for their hate speech, right. All they do is espouse hate for Jews and Christians every day. Of course, we all know this isn’t going to happen but we need to push back on this to show their hypocrisy.
