Manchester Police APOLOGIZED For Mock 2016 Jihad Homicide Bombing

13

[the_ad id=”90513″]

“The Community Safety Organization, which seeks to combat Islamophobia, tweeted ‘This sort of thing panders to stereotypes and further divides us. It will increase anti-Muslim hate crime.’”

That’s what British authorities are worried about, even now, after the Manchester jihad massacre: “anti-Muslim hate crime.” Jihad mass murder? That’s a fact of life in the big city, said London’s Muslim mayor.

Story continues below advertisement

“Manchester Police Apologized For Mock 2016 Suicide Bombing”, by Jack Crowe, Daily Caller, May 24, 2017:

The Greater Manchester Police (GMP) was forced to apologize for a suicide bombing training exercise in May 2016 because the mock bomber yelled “allahu akbar” during the exercise.

The exercise, which featured 800 volunteers and was designed to test emergency services response, was met with a wave of criticism on Twitter.

Manchester peace activist Dr. Erinma Bell was among the most vocal critics. She argued “a terrorist can be anyone” and “we need to move away from stereotypes.”

The Community Safety Organization, which seeks to combat Islamophobia, tweeted “This sort of thing panders to stereotypes and further divides us. It will increase anti-Muslim hate crime.”

GMP assistant chief constable Garry Shewan explained that the training exercise was specifically designed to mimic an ISIS style attack but quickly apologized.

“We acknowledge that it was unacceptable to use this religious phrase immediately before the mock suicide bombing, which so vocally linked this exercise with Islam,” he said. “We recognize and apologize for the offense that this has caused.”

Greater Manchester Mayor Tony Lloyd also apologized for the event stating that while the preparation measures were important they were “marred by the ill-judged, unnecessary and unacceptable decision by organisers” to have those playing the parts of terrorists shout allahu akbar…..

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack Jackson
Jack Jackson
6 years ago

No what creates Islamic hatred is four terrorist attacks in a week and half of them targeted at children. How can this Islamic imbecile still be mayor of London? Keep running your mouth and you won’t be you demonic pig.

Mullah Lodabullah
Mullah Lodabullah
6 years ago

Pandering to followers of the phony god and false prophet seems to have lead to an increase in mass-Kuffarcides. The UK is being dudded from without, and from within.

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago

Of course, all rights and freedom are to be given to Muslims and non-muslims do not have any rights as dhimmis ! And Left/liberal pro-jihadi loons allow it !

Infidels do not even have right to protest against crimes committed by Muslims . If they dare try it they get harassed, jailed or killed http://bit.ly/2r6F3cp

welcome to the New Britainistan.

Elizabethmyoung
Elizabethmyoung
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj51d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!mj51d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash51TopMobileGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj51d..,..

bn
bn
6 years ago

Those who believe that giving muslims equal rights and religious freedom is the right thing to do, because this is morally superior, are deluded and detached from reality. The reality is that giving muslims equal rights and religious freedom is not morally superior, but morally inferior. Here is why –

– Believing in equal rights and religious freedom is morally good. Therefore, these can be regarded as good morals. However, muslim morals are in opposition to these. Therefore, muslim morals can be regarded as bad morals. By giving the bad morals of muslims, complete liberty to flourish, the good morals have effectively, given the bad morals the opportunity to grow. In doing so, the good morals have undermined the good, to the benefit of the bad. Which means, the good morals have themselves paved the way for the success of bad morals – Does this sound morally superior? What would happen once muslims become the majority in your nation? – Freedom? Liberty? Tolerance? Of course not. When muslims become the majority in your nation, all these good morals will disappear.

Therefore, by giving muslims equal rights and religious freedom, we have given the bad morals of muslims, the opportunity to do away with our good morals, and implant their bad morals. We ourselves have enabled the eventual destruction of good morals. And the morals, that enable the destruction of good morals, are not morally superior, but morally inferior. And this is why giving muslims equal rights and religious freedom, is morally inferior, not superior. Let us abandon the erroneous belief that we are doing the right thing by giving muslims equal rights and the freedom to practice islam. We are not.

Swansea_Jack
Swansea_Jack
6 years ago
Reply to  bn

Good point bn. There is also similarity to the world of cyber-security. Cyber criminals create programmes and attachments that are designed to look harmless to a computer (or it’s user) so that they can pass the firewall and enter a computer system. Once inside the system, the malevolent ‘payload’ is then released to do its worst – under cover and out of sight. Claims for ‘cultural diversity’ and ‘freedom from oppression’ are flags that can be waved by the honest – but also by the dishonest. They give an enemy attacker the appearance of being safe – yet once inside the system their ‘payload’ is unleashed. This is guerrilla warfare – but on our own territory. Our enemies now hide among us. They don’t wear uniforms. We don’t know where their bases are. They attack us where and when we least expect it. The only way to deal with harmful cyber crime payloads is to learn to identify them and ensure that they never enter into the system. For some reason, when it comes to the enemies of democracy and freedom, we have ended up in a situation where the most obvious signs of a potential for malevolence (i.e. professed ideology, place or origin, history of association etc) are seemingly ignored by the authorities. The assumption seems to be that everyone is a good person – when it is well appreciated that there are also evil people out there – who wish to do us harm. Trying to neutralize the threat once it is established is a road to ruin. As with the computer virus, the enemy within was always intended to avoid detection – and to corrupt the system it has entered. The viruses multiply and today it looks as if we have so many in the system that our forces are overwhelmed. I think the UK government may well be preparing for a change in strategy. Fingers crossed… The release of the newly accepted number of 23,000 enemy combatants is not meant to calm the nerves of the population, it must be intended to help make the case for a new approach. Or am I being naive?

rfh
rfh
6 years ago
Reply to  Swansea_Jack

That is a very good explanation and I agree entirely. Regarding the last point, and the general precept, I would like to add one thing –

Let us say there are 1 million muslims in your nation. Let us say that the virus’s name is islam. The files of this virus, are in the form of its followers. Most of the files are additive files (non-terrorist muslims), and some are striker files (terrorist muslims). The additive files serve the function of increasing the islamic virus’s strength, through multiplication. They serve the function of addition. The striker files serve the function of executing one of the virus’s critical tasks, in pursuance of the virus’s defense as well as offense on the non-islamic target.

What will happen once the non-terrorist muslims, who have not committed any crime whatsoever, dominate? – Islam will dominate

And what will happen if the terrorist muslims dominate? – Islam will dominate

In both the cases then, we see that the virus of islam will ultimately prevail. So where exactly is the threat here? – The threat is in —> both additive and striker files.

The only difference being the application of the virus. Which means, if the terrorist muslims win, then the application of islam will be more severe than if the non-terrorist muslims win. That is it. In both the cases however, it will be the same islamic virus – The same allah, the same quran, the same muhammad, and everything in between.

So what we see here is that, the islamic threat is not to be understood in terms of a ‘few terrorist’ muslims, but the —> entirety of muslims. All muslims are different files of the same islamic virus, divided into 2 different functions – Addition, and execution. And regardless of which type of muslims prevail – Islam will prevail. It should be noted that the additive files can very well serve all the functions necessary for islam to thrive, without any help from the striker files.

So we see, in order to protect ourselves from the islamic virus, the only solution is to target the entirety of islam and outlaw it. This would make every single muslim a criminal until he abandons islam. But of course, this we can never do. And so we will lose inevitably.

Nefarious420D
Nefarious420
6 years ago

At least we can now drop the Great from Great Britain, maybe Not so good Britain, Bad Britain, Deadly Britian, Or Britainistan?

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

Snivelling britain, angst filled subservient hand wringers who will die denying the reality of muslim terrorist assassins.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
6 years ago

england is finished. they elected a muslim mayor who tells the non-muslims to just get used to muslims murdering them, and they’ll probably re-elect him

imwithstoopid
imwithstoopid
6 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

More that likely make him the PM sooner or later.

Jos de Bleyser
Jos de Bleyser
6 years ago

Islam is pure Filth, read theyre books and you know…..

Stefanie Daniella
Stefanie Daniella
6 years ago

it is willful negligence
to omit critical elements such as islamic “lethal warnings” such as the world infamous cowardly muslim kill-call “allahu akbar” (satan is greater, “allah” being a pseudonym)

when real muslims call for their god in real times of need, they use the more generic “ohhh, ilah!” like our “Oh, God” (omg) (when loved ones are hurt or killed, in tragic situations)

muslims kill (act of worship: ibadah jihad) essentially in the NAME of allah (=fake god idol) which actually uses the name of their master/lord of this world (serpent of old: devil, satan, lucifer, etc) … he is behind every idol humans bow or pray to, even if it is a rock, temple, sun or moon or star(s)

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!