ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton

26

[the_ad id=”90513″]

The ACLU and its Muslim lawyer Omar Jadwat are not interested in enforcing the law, which grants the President the right to restrict immigration, and they have no interest in defending the United States. They just want to destroy President Trump. If the executive order is constitutional, it is constitutional no matter who enacts it.

“ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton,” NTK Network, May 8, 2017:

Story continues below advertisement

ACLU Lawyer Omar Jadwat, arguing against President Trump’s travel ban before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, admitted that the same exact travel ban “could be” constitutional if it were enacted by Hillary Clinton.

Jadwat argued that Trump’s campaign animus motivated the order, making it illegitimate. This claim was challenged by the Fourth Circuit’s Judge Paul Niemeyer.

“If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?” Niemeyer asked.

Jadwat dodged on directly answering the question at first, but Niemeyer persisted, asking the question again.

Jadwat again tried to avoid the question, asking for clarification on the hypothetical, but Niemeyer once again demanded an answer.

“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”

“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.

Jadwat also denied that presidents’ actions should be nullified by campaign statements, despite the fact that his entire argument seemed to rest on that claim….

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

muslims for hatred, that is the bottom line of every grunt and chirp from cair. They, of course they fully support hillary and the democrats as the same arab holding company that owns cair, also owns the democrats and hillary. The aclu are clearly a special interest exclusive bigoted origination that preys on the American sense of fair play. Note. shari’a does not share any values of mercy or forgiveness with anyone, including itself.

JacksonPearson
JacksonPearson
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Forgiveness is NOT a Muslim value.
You can take the savages out of the Middle East, but you can’t take Islam out of the savages.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Yes, the ACLU most certainly IS a special interest – their lawyer is muslim!

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago

They know Hillary will never ban muslims , all she cares how much she gets from saudi/qatar and she will allow all jihadis into America while keeping out christian refugees.

Dems including Obama have not only denied refugees status to
christians from middle east who are real refugee but even have deported christians back to ISIS territory to be slaughtered by ISIS http://tinyurl.com/mtc3xch

Not one media covered it !

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Do not miss the issue, even if Hillary does not ban refugess, it is what he said that he would back the ban if Hillary banned refugees.

You cannot have same ban by a different President, but same ban by another Prseident. The case shiuld have been ruled in favour of Prseident Trump

karl59
karl59
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Hillary Clinton has been in the hip pocket of Saudi Arabia for years.

Mark Steiner
Mark Steiner
6 years ago

Fact of the matter is – if Hillary were president, an executive order banning Muslims would not be issued.

It should be clear – the obvious, total association and commitment of the Demoncratic Party and Islam. If it is not – what planet do you live on?

It is an association bent on the destruction of human government and humans.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  Mark Steiner

Which is why the lying deceitful ACLU picked hillary, because they knew she wouldn’t do it. They could have picked satan himself for the same reason.

NotTheMama
NotTheMama
6 years ago

Typical Muslim. Totally devoid of any logical thinking.

Doloresjlugo
Doloresjlugo
6 years ago
Reply to  NotTheMama

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj233d:
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
!mj233d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash233ShopBusinessGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj233d..,….

JacksonPearson
JacksonPearson
6 years ago

The anti-American ACLU should be declared a terrorist organization.

Dave from San AntonioD
Dave from San Antonio
6 years ago
Reply to  JacksonPearson

Now that…I’ve said for many years…along with the SPLC.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  JacksonPearson

It is – their lawyer is a muslim who defends terrorists!

knightsstrength
knightsstrength
6 years ago

He should be deported for not recognising President Trump Executive Order on banning Refugees but would with another President.

You canmot deny one and accept another that offers the same ban by another President so his arguments are false, deport the scum. Throw the scum out of court.

Steve
Steve
6 years ago

This Is the proverbial “you can’t make this stuff up”. If a person didn’t know any better you could imagine this being some sort of comedy. The only problem is that aclu guy’s serious.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago

Maxine Waters (D-CA) is out on the stump saying Trump’s Executive Order is unlawful but had Hillary won the election, it would be acceptable. If not for the double standard, the commiecrats would have no standards at all.

Robert Batchelor
Robert Batchelor
6 years ago

So true!

Dave from San AntonioD
Dave from San Antonio
6 years ago

Very true…and anything immoral…is part of their ‘standards’ for behavior.

Alleged Comment
Alleged Comment
6 years ago

Proof Demoncraps and their supporters have NO morals or ethics at all. They just want YOU DEAD!

By any means necessary but all the same thing – GENOCIDE of the white race. Via abortion, destroying your Christianity, illegal immigration, a white hating sodomite Nerogro (still active with his hatred), and a white man-hating woman called Hillaryous.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago

ACLU Lawyers Say Any Laws Broken by Hillary Clinton, are NOT really Laws !!!comment image

OLD FART MARINE
OLD FART MARINE
6 years ago

Every day that muslims are here is one more day freedom is weakened.
SEMPER FIDELIS

az
az
6 years ago

wait, so the word of your favorite crooked vagina is legit, only because it serves your own twisted personal agenda?
Muslim stupidity (in action or words) is really boundless…

JEANNIEMAC2
JEANNIEMAC2
6 years ago

Apparently the excuse being used to stop President Trump’s ban is because he used the words, “Muslim ban” sometime in the past. This phrase is considered discriminatory by the judge, even though the phrase is not used in the wording of the ban. If Hillary Clinton used the exact same wording of the ban, it would be OK, because she had not used the phrase, “Muslim ban” in the past. This is over reach on the judge’s part, and I bet a good lawyer could find the loophole.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago
Reply to  JEANNIEMAC2

The judge has already overstepped his constitutional powers and made an unconstitutional decision which should be nullified for that reason.

Dave from San AntonioD
Dave from San Antonio
6 years ago

And thus the double-standard of liberals is exposed…again.

marlene
marlene
6 years ago

WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. Our Constitution already BANS muslims from even entering our country! The lying deceitful ACLU picks hillary because they know she wouldn’t do it. They could have picked satan himself for the same reason!

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!