Pamela Geller to Obama: ‘Bring it on’

66

If Obama wants to go to war against the American people, I say —

“Pamela Geller to Obama: ‘Bring it on'”

By Cheryl Chumley, WND, December 10, 2015
Slams White House for P.C. push on Muslim-related rhetoric

Story continues below advertisement

Pamela Geller, founder of the popular Atlas Shrugs blog and president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative – an organization deemed an anti-Muslim hate group by the liberal leaning Southern Poverty Law Center – issued a boldface challenge to President Obama in the wake of his administration’s press for politically correct rhetoric about radical Islamists, telling the commander in chief, bluntly: “Bring it on,” she said.

The challenge came on the heels of widely reported comments Geller made to a Florida radio host about Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s recent remarks on Muslims.

[the_ad id=”72852″]

Lynch, at a Muslim Advocates dinner on Dec. 3, said she found the “rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” an “incredibly disturbing” phenomenon, one that might not meet the federal standards of free speech.

Her words, as reported by WND: “Now obviously this is a country that is based on free speech, but when it edges towards violence, when we see the potential for someone … lifting that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric, or, as we saw after 9/11, violence against individuals who may not even be Muslims but may be perceived to be Muslims … When we see that, we will take action.”

Lynch also remarked how the federal government has “had a thousand investigations into acts of anti-Muslim hatred, including rhetoric and bigoted actions, with over 45 prosecutions,” since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks on American soil, Breitbart reported.

Commentators and political watchers quickly wondered what Lynch meant by the vow to “take action,” and whether that was a heads up the federal government, under President Obama’s watch, was going to start prosecuting people for statements they make against Muslims that are perceived as hateful or inflammatory.

Geller was one of those raising the red flag on Lynch’s remarks. And in an interview with radio host Joyce Kaufman, in context of discussing the potential of being arrested for speech that federal officials deemed fuel for a crime against Muslims, Geller said over the airwaves to Lynch: “Come and get me, biatch.”

In an email to WND, Geller doubled down on her criticisms of the Obama administration, while elaborating on the Florida radio interview.

She wrote: “In an interview … with popular Florida radio host (and woman warrior) Joyce Kaufman, we discussed Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s pledge to Muslim groups that she would prosecute ‘anti-Muslim’ rhetoric. That was the Obama administration’s take away from the San Bernardino jihad slaughter – sharia enforcement. I said to Joyce, if some idiot did something stupid and had Atlas Shrugs in his browser history, then by all accounts, Lynch could arrest me based on this new policy. And I declared, ‘Come and get me, biatch.’”

She then turned a critical eye directly to the president, and wrote: “If Obama wants to go to war against the American people, I say, bring it on. Jihadists wage jihad in order to impose sharia and they have succeeded. Terror in the White House.”

[the_ad id=”73494″]

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
66 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Xavier
Xavier
8 years ago

Much respect, Pamela. Thanks for saying what we’re all thinking.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago
Reply to  Xavier

Pam take some solace…. T minus 12 and lynch will be out of a job, lol

MrLogical
MrLogical
8 years ago
Reply to  joe1429

And if Hillary wins, she’ll put in someone who’s just as bad… if not worse.
Hillary is a closet lover of the Palestinians and a 2-state ‘solution’ which she advocated back when she was the carpet-bagger Jr. Senator of NY.

A 2-state ‘solution’ isn’t a ‘solution’ at all. She would throw Israel under the bus just as Obama has. Birds of a feather.
.

Rocinante44
Rocinante44
8 years ago

this next year will be interesting. we’ve never had an american president and the two dominant political parties loathed by 2/3 of people, which is where they are heading, and never had a populace living in fear of muslim terrorism sponsored by the president himself. imagine if FDR was a jap, and told us that our japiphobia caused pearl harbor…you get the picture. civil talk is going to disappear, just like in this article, and outright hate-filled speech for this pos will become the norm. what then? this should be fun

Don Grantham
Don Grantham
8 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

When virtually every segment of society is up in arms over something or other, sooner or later something is going to crack, and it won’t be pretty.
As the saying goes, “You ain’t seen NUTHIN’ yet.”

Patriot
Patriot
8 years ago
Reply to  Don Grantham

I hope you are right on the money and the sooner it happens the better. I’m hoping its going to be really really BIG. The biggest ever in fact.
BUT in this nation of sheep I fear the monkey in the WH will get to serve out his full term.
Every Republican not calling for charging him with treason is a traitor himself and needs a good beat-down ass-whoopin’.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago
Reply to  Rocinante44

Hey you hit it right on the head. Its like a jap prez leading us in the war against the japs, lmao

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

The democrats are declaring war on the american people, with islam as the democrats ally and leader.

Budvarakbar
Budvarakbar
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

That was actually 70-80 years ago when the demo-COMMUNISTS were infiltrated and gradually taken over by the 1910-1920’s transplanted ‘refugee’ Bolsheviks from RUSSIA — only they just had to go back to the low-key Menshevik approach — dam eff’n bastards

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  Budvarakbar

Never turn your back on a democrat, they will resort to anything to serve their stunned ideals.

real 'merican
real 'merican
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

Appears the Republicans are on the side of the Democrats. Obama should have been charged with treason the day they signed a deal to let Iran have nukes. But they did nothing, just like they have done every time Obola breaks the law.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  real 'merican

It is very hard to understand the current batch of republicans, something is not right in the government, it will take a major change and upset to get to the bottom of that snake pit.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

“Get to the bottom of that snake pit.” Interesting turn of phrase.
No offense, but I don’t think I’d be wanting to get to the bottom of a snake pit, no matter what kind of snakes were at the bottom of it.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

It will require a weed eater and a lot of work, but there is something down there that the democrats are covering up.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I had always thought of snake pits as places to completely avoid. Like I might say the Gaza Strip is a snake pit, or Somalia is a snake pit, or Pakstain is a snake pit. But, you’ve found a new use for an old phrase. Happy Sunday.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

There are some nasty places that have to be cleaned out, sooner or later. Might as well get started now, the toxins of islam are not going to dilute with time.

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago

HE IS ALREADY THE JIHADIST KING OF OUR LAND / LOCKING UP CLINT LORANCE FOR KILLING THE CALIBAN THAT KILLS CHILDREN HE WONT CALL CALIBAN TERRORISTS BUT ” INSURGENTS ” … THEN RELEASED THESE MASS MURDERERS …. PERSISTENTLY PRETENDING THAT ISLAM IS NOT ISLAM … PERSISTENTLY ALLOWING THINGS LIKE SNITCHING OUT SEAL TEAM 6 BY BIDEN … PROMOTING DOMESTIC TERROR PROMOTER RAPPER FOR N O I … ISLAMIC CAMPS TRAINING IN OUR OWN LAND / GIVING EVERY KIND OF SUPPORT TO NOT ONLY DECEPTIONS ABOUT ISLAM BUT HELPING ITS OPPRESSORS AND HURTING OUR DEFENDERS …. I WOULD SAY HE IS ALREADY BRINGING IT … IT IS GONE WAY BEYONG HIM ” BRINGING IT ” NOW WHAT ARE WE DOING ABOUT IT ? LOOK WHAT CRUZ DID YOU HAD FAITH IN … HE LIED AND SAID THAT ISLAMS SEDITION AND NON PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY WAS ” CONSTITUTIONAL ” … NOW AS WE SAY OUR OWN DESTRUCTION IS ” CONSTITUTIONAL ” … AGREE WITH OBAMA About muslim ” friends ” and ” radicalization ” we are also erasing the truth about obama INVOLVEMENT IJ ISLAM THAT DECLARES US AS THE ENEMY … IF WE CANT JUST TELL THE TRUTH HOW CAN WE WIN ? WE ARE NOT EVEN ARRESTING OBAMA , AN UINPRESIDENTED TRAITOR … EVEN IF YOIUU BELIEVED BIDEN AND HE ” INADVERTENTLY ” ANNOUNCED CLASSIFIED INTEL ON WORLD WIDE NEWS STRAIGHT INTO CALIBAN LIVING ROOMS … HOW IS IT THEN BIDEN WAS NOT FIRED BUT RECENTLY COMENDED BY OBAMA AS PRESIDENT MATERIAL ? THE ISSUE IS NOT THAT THE ENEMY HAS NOT BRUNG IT BUT THAT WE ARE CONFUSED AND NOT DIRECTING ACCURATE RETURN FIRE … I LOVE YOU PAM BUT US WORSHIPPING CELEBS AND PERSONALITIES IS WHERE WE ARE GOIUNG WRONG . WE MUST HONOR TRUTH AND FACE IT ON ITS OWN TERMS … WE ARE NON VIGILANTLY FAILING TO COMPLETELY OPPOSE OUR ENEMIES . WHAT 100% OF MOSQUES PREACH PEDOPHGILE WARLORD WOMAN HATING RELIGIOUS PERSECUTING SEDITION / SHARIA ? A: 100%OF MOSQUES ………PERSISTENTLY I SEE A STRANGE CLOAked non vigilance that is an over confidence and a denial … part of our being conquered is that we think we are not being conquered .,.. now as i predicted obama has finally uttered ” radical islam ” specifically ” dark path to radicalization / perverted from of islam ” the same lie e v e r y CANDIDATE CURRENTLY IS UTTERING .. LETS JUST BE REAL MUSLIMS ARE MUSLIMS AND ISLAM IS ISLAM … NONE OF IT IS ” GOOD ” WE ARE THERE ENEMIES BY THERE OWN BELIEFS . AS E V E R Y CANDIDATE IS ENABLING WE NEED OUR LIONESS TO DIG A LITTLE DEEPER IN THE TRUTH / INSIST ON TRUTH / PRESENT THE TRUTH NOT BEING PRESSED FOR … THE CENTRAL ISSUE THAT WE ARE MAKING DECEPTIVE LOOPHOLES FOR OUR OWN ENEMIES THE BIGGEST ISIS ATTACK WAS FACILITATED BY NON VIGILANCE AND CLOAKING ISLAM AS ” AN ANGEL OF LIGHTB ” ISIS IS PLAIN ISLAM … THE KILLINGS – JUST MUSLIMS PRACTICING ISLAM . 911 WAs MUSLIMS PRATING ISLAM ” BRINGING IT ” AND G W B TOLD THE SAME LIES ALL Candidates AND OBAMA HIMSELF ARE TELLING NOW . I AM IN FVOR OF JUST DOING WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BUT WE ARENT EVEN FACING THE GRIM REALITY . IMAGINE IT LIKE MUHAMMAD ON TRIAL … WE KEEP LETTING HIM SLIP THROUGH LEFTIST CRACKS AND FAIL TO PUT HIM WHERE THERE IS NO ESCAPE AND NO MORE INNOCENTS VICTIMIZED . GREETINGS FROM TERRORIST ENABLED FL … BOMBER WAS .4 MILES FROM ME AND ALONG WITH BEING BLOCKED BY S T I O A FOR SAYING ” RADICALIZAtion ” is a lie … leftists and muslims are hacking attacking boycotting and hushing me too . we need to unite under truth . islam is winning through or lies we don’t call out and well disguised enabling

Kaitlyn Thomas
Kaitlyn Thomas
8 years ago
Reply to  Parks Curtis

You are right about everything. Muslims are slowly invading our country under The Obama administration and they will eventually be able to overwhelm our cities and our law enforcements its sad how our citizens are refusing to face the truth about this president as our country and our freedom is slowly slipping away..

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago
Reply to  Kaitlyn Thomas

ALL OF OUR LEADERS ARE FAILING US AND PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF MUHAMMAD NOT OUR CHILDREN … OBAMA IS JUST A PUPET IN A LONG SERIES OF PUPPETS KNOWN AS A CALLIPHATE AND CALLIPHATE APPEASERS … WHEN WE FACE TRUTH ON TRUTHS TERMS WE SEE THAT WE ARE NOT INSISTING ONTRUTH THAT IS WHY THE LIES AND LIARS ARE PROSPERING THE PRESSURE NEED TO BE ON FURTHERING TRUTH NOT CELEBS … NO PRESSURING FOR ACCURATE KBNOWLEDGE AND RESPONSIBLE REPORTINGcomment image

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  Parks Curtis

It should not be a question, but hussain has clearly demonstrated that the constitution is not a democrat value. Stump, by not voicing an immediate and unequivocal “yes, he will support the constitution” indicates that it is up for negotiation or sale. So, to rephrase that, what would Stump consider an American value worth upholding, other than financial profit of any type?

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

MU$$$LIM FABULIOUS FREIND TRUMP LOVES JUST CALLED AND SAID HE WOULD PAY YOU NOT TO EXPOSE TRUMP FURTHER…. BECAUSE THEY NEED THESE GIGS FOR THERE SEX SLAVE HAREM PARTIES THAT INVOLVE MINORS … AND THAT PARTY BUZZ KILL WOULD BE WOULD BE AGAINST ” ALLAHS WILL ” IN TRUE ISLAMcomment image

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  Parks Curtis

Bring on the dancing goats. Part-ayy like it’s 610, it is to rock, nothing like a stoned eahira for the mujahideen to get their rocks off on.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

LOL. Stump. But if it comes down to Shillariah the sea hag vs. anyone, (e.g. Popeye the sailor, Apollo, Paul Bunyan, The Michelin Man), I’ll be voting for anyone.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Chewbacacca for President.

breeding like muslim rats
breeding like muslim rats
8 years ago
Reply to  Kaitlyn Thomas

Not very slowly – and those that are here will breed like rats

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago

THATS WHY I GET BLOCKED WHEN PEOPLE FAIL TO ADRESS BEING HONEST ABOUT ISLAM NOT P C ” RADICAL ISLAM ” LYING LOOPHOLE THAT LETS THEM IN … BUT THEY FOCUS ON BULLETS WHILE SPREADING THE SAME CONFOMIST PROPGANDA THAT WILL HAVE THE GREATER NUMBER OF MUSLIMS BUYING UP ALL THE BULLETS

MrLogical
MrLogical
8 years ago

And breed like rats at our expense.
Muslims are world-class welfare consumers.
.

JayPee
JayPee
8 years ago

Although O’Bama declares extremist idiotology
If you brazenly stand up to him
he will usually back off
So much for his fortitude
he is essentially a big mouth COWARD
And so are all the leftist extremists
When they have an hysterical crowd with them
their forthrightiousness is beyond measure
When isolated, they deny everything and
cowardly hide in the shadows
All that America has do is
STAND UP TO THIS LYING COWARD.

latosensu
latosensu
8 years ago
Reply to  JayPee

Øbamboozeler

thisguy
thisguy
8 years ago

Bravo Pamela, way to use your constitutional rights of free speech, the rights that Obumer wants to opress. Guess he wants sharia to rule america. Let freedom ring.

MrLogical
MrLogical
8 years ago

Here’s the $64k question:

Will Jews again vote reflexively for Democrats at a 70% rate or have they finally awakened to the fact that the ‘modern’ Democrat party is anathema to Jews and Israel? Recall that famous description: “They earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.”?

Guess what – it’s true.

Obama hates you.
Hillary hates you too.
And Bernie, despite being a Jew, isn’t your friend by any means.

Wake up, this ain’t your father’s Democrat party anymore.

Budvarakbar
Budvarakbar
8 years ago
Reply to  MrLogical

The answer to your question is: YES!

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  MrLogical

It’s not just Jews, my retarded Christian family always reflexively voted Dem0rat. The Dem0rat’s could’ve put up Idi Amin for POTUS and they would’ve voted for him.

MrLogical
MrLogical
8 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

But among non-Jews, the split between D’s and R’s is around 45:45. Not so with Jews. They’re almost as reliable as blacks and Hispanics when it comes to D party loyalty. 70+% – election after election. Perhaps in ’16 after 8 years of B. Hussein (and especially the last few years) they’ll finally wake up and smell the coffee.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago
Reply to  MrLogical

Lets see in nov.. If they dont smell the coffe after odousche throwing israel under the bus, and being buddies with iran, its hopeless.

Anna
Anna
8 years ago
Reply to  MrLogical

Thanks, MrLogical, for speaking the truth, and putting the challenge to those “Democratic” Jews to wake up to the anti-Semitism in and around them! This formerly-Democratic Jew is not voting Democratic…no way.

MrLogical
MrLogical
8 years ago
Reply to  Anna

I’m not a Jew but have several relatives by marriage who are. Some of them, IMO, have “figured things out,” but a few are reflexively Democrats because, “…they’ve always been Democrats.” I remind them that the last Democrats who were worth a s**t were Harry Truman and JFK. Every one since has been at best indifferent to the plight of the Jews and Israel and at worst, covert enemies. Some of the D’s are finally scratching their heads about ’16.

The worst in recent memory was Jimmy Carter … until B. Hussein came along. He’s in a class all his own. And frankly, if you carefully examine Hillary’s record on Israel and the Palestinians, she’s not much better.

Look at who supported the president’s deal with Iran and that should tell you everything you need to know about who is and who isn’t a friend of the Jews.

Pray for Israel.

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
8 years ago

The SPLC has the temerity to be labeling someone else a”hate group”? Pot, meet Kettle.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago

Your spelling needs work. Besides, liynch does better with soccer, too

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

If all you have to contribute is a spell chequer, don’t bother.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I was being facetious. I`ll admit I rarely contribute an opinion here. Here`s one; I do not respect the mentality which wants and works toward destroying our country. I despise the philosophies that are the basis for world domination. I cling to my Bible and my gun. Should that offend a group or an individual, I can only comment: Doom on you !

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

That is the way it should be, a little bit of patriotism is necessary, the current government is not patriotic, it would enslave humanity to inflate its flatulent ego. The people will have to teach the government all about doom, preferably by democratic process… there are options.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

‘doom on you’ is a miss spelling of a Vietnamese phrase’. It was used in the animated Ice Age movie. If you were to ‘google’ it, the term would have new meaning.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

wiorjfn fneiow idnr jkafe is a miss spelling of my reply. Engrish mi secrond rangrage, no unnetoud funi wrd oose.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

All seriousness aside, in actuality, etc. I`m much impressed and most pleased to meet you. ( : I read your remarks regarding the moose and islamist`s praying. LOL

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

Thanks, happy to meet you too, one meets the nicest people on an open forum.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

I enjoy someone with an active imagination. I tend to hear an idea, or a thought and take it to it`s conclusion. One fellow suggested I consider an ‘illogical fallacy’. Well, I did, and concluded such a thing was illogical. Kind of like our current leaders. But, if one`s aim is to dominate others, then even then, their efforts are illogical. Confucius, in his Great Learning, lays out a happy, contented kingdom.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

If you compare Confucianism, Mencius to Lao Tzu to any number of other far eastern philosophers, he is not necessarily the best, but he had the best publicist. Confucius has a problem with his difficulty in seeing that some people did not see or accept his stance. But, like all philosophers they have their points, in the end, it seems that the ones with the most influential patrons get best acceptance.

David C. Telliho
David C. Telliho
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

In Machiavelli, The Prince, my impression is our benevolent leaders have studied him, but with a greedy eye for power. Please forgive me, it`s my beddy-bye nite time. Hope to visit more. I find you to have depth. Thank you for being you !

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

Thank all of us for being ourselves, and not submitting to any cloning system, like islam.

kilfincelt
kilfincelt
8 years ago

The number of Islamic terrorist attacks that have occurred per day around the world since 9/11 is about 5. Based on Lynch’s figures, the U.S. has prosecuted about .4% of those who have committed anti-Muslim hate crimes, etc. since 9/11. What Lynch doesn’t tell us is how many of those prosecutions resulted in convictions. That figure tells me that Muslims are not the victims that they claim to be but the perpetrators of a vast disinformation campaign as is Obozo.

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago
Reply to  kilfincelt

I AM PRETTY SURE THE PALM BEACH ISLAMIC CENTER THAT HAD WINDOWS BUSTED WAS THE SAME ONE INVOLVED IN TERRORISM AND MY FIRST THOUGHT WAS ” I BET THEY DID THAT FOR THE ‘ANTIMUSLIM BACKLASH COVERING UP WHAT ISLAM A C T U A L L Y IS AND BEING THE ‘VICTIMS OF UNFAIR GENERALIZATION ” WHEN THEY DAMN WELL KNOW THEY WORSHIP A DECEITFUL TERRORIST PROPHEYT WHO SAID ” KILL ALL NON MUSLIMS ” … THEN I SAW “VICTIM OF HATE ” ISLAMIC CENTER THAT PREACHES HATE , PHOTO OF PERP HAD HAT ON SIDEWAYS LIKE MUSLIM RAPPER WANNA BES … THEN PHOTO OF OFFENDER LOOKED LIKE AN ISLAMAWIGGER … MADE ME WONDER … DID THEY PAY SOME WHITE MUSLIM KID TO TRASH THE CENTER TO PRETEND ITS A ” RACIST ” THING ?

Brianroysinputvideo .
Brianroysinputvideo .
8 years ago

What we have is an out of control Attorney General because we have an out of control foreign usurper who can’t even prove his mother is a United States Citizen by birth identity documentation and witnesses, let alone uncontested DNA, in any U.S. Court of Law, who was allowed in by two Criminal Enterprise regimes run by the Bushes through the RNC and the Clintons through the DNC. Pamela needs good sound cases that will take the offensive and win by a 100% correct use of those cases if or when she is ever taken to court, or goes on the offensive for continuing to correctly report on Islam’s viciousness as a hostile anti-freedom of speech organized structure hiding behind “freedom of religion” and itself its own chief instigator of self-perpetuating violence and terrorist activity.

Ex Parte Milligan , 71 U. S. 2 (1866) @121
http://supreme.justia.com/us/71/2/case.html
“…the President…is controlled by law, and has his appropriate sphere of duty, which is to execute, not to make, the laws;

and there is “no unwritten criminal code to which resort can be had as a source of jurisdiction.”

Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1925) @177
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/272/52/case.html
“…MR. JUSTICE HOLMES, dissenting.
… The duty of the President to see that the laws be executed is a duty that does not go beyond the laws or require him to achieve more than Congress sees fit to leave within his power.”

He is to act within the confines of the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, because the Constitution is a law, not a guide of recommendations. The Constitution lists a Bill of Rights he must uphold, but Obama is apathetic to any admonition to this regard and the legal counsel.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)@ 180
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/case.html
“… in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned,
and not the laws of the United States generally,
but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution,
have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) @ 491
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/436/case.html
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.”

Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) @ 272
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/266/
“It is clear, of course, that no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution.”

Huntington v. Worthen, 120 U.S. 97 (1887) @101-102
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/120/97/case.html
“An unconstitutional act is not a law; it binds no one, and protects no one.”

Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879) @376 -377
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/100/371/case.html
“An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offence created by it is not a crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous, but is illegal and void, and cannot be a legal cause of imprisonment.”

And again, to add injury to injury, since Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen and has NO admissible in U.S. Court documentation to prove authority under Bute v. Illinois 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653 and Nguyen v. INS 533 U.S. 53 (2001) @ 54, 62; then, he has no authority and no tangible office by which to prosecute except as a criminal in office acting under color of authority in a usurpation of power, and by extension, even Attorney General Lynch is herself illegal to serve or execute the powers of her office as fruit of the poisonous tree.

Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) 159 – 160
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/209/123/case.html
The act to be enforced is alleged to be unconstitutional, and, if it be so…it is simply an illegal act upon the part of a State official in attempting, by the use of the name of the State, to enforce a legislative enactment which is void because unconstitutional. If the act which the state [official] …seeks to enforce be a violation of the Federal Constitution, the officer, in proceeding under such enactment, comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is, in that case, stripped of his official or representative character, and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. See In re Ayers, supra, p. 123 U. S. 507.

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935) @ 495
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/295/495/case.html
“Extraordinary conditions, such as an economic crisis, may call for extraordinary remedies, but they cannot create or enlarge constitutional power.” [See also pages 528-29].

Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270 (1885) @ 290
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/114/270/case.html
“…the maxim that the King can do no wrong has no place in our system of government, yet it is also true, in respect to the state itself, that whatever wrong is attempted in its name is imputable to its government, and not to the state, for, as it can speak and act only by law, whatever it does say and do must be lawful. That which therefore is unlawful because made so by the supreme law, the Constitution of the United States, is not the word or deed of the state, but is the mere wrong and trespass of those individual persons who falsely speak and act in its name. ”

By declaring you have powers and authority outside that granted by the Constitution and acting on that claim, you act and speak falsely in the name of the Government and under color of authority.

That means that Obama is prosecutable without statute of limitations and without protection for being a usurper, not being a Constitutionally qualified office holder without a U.S. Natural Born Citizenship (even as he votes as Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, for himself in the 2012 election with a White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue address, etc., with his biological mother being maternally likely an Indonesian daughter of the Subud Cult founder and NOT Ann Dunham); and that Chief Justice Roberts, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, John Brennan, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi may also all one day concurrently join him in prison as well is someone like Donald Trump becomes POTUS, it seems to me.

In Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) @447
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/case.html
the United States Supreme Court in regard to the use of what some may deem as violent speech held that U.S. Government may “forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation [only] where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”

The primary concern of free speech that crosses the line, in the opinion of the Court, will generally focus on whether if or not the speech itself poses a “clear and present danger” to Society so as to cause actual harm. Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) @52

http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/249/47/case.html

“The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. It does not even protect a man from an injunction against uttering words that may have all the effect of force. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U. S. 418, 221 U. S. 439. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree.”

Then, in Yates v. United States 354 U.S. 298 (1957) @ 318,
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/298/case.html
we also have the distinction made between the “abstract principle [of discussing rebellion], divorced from any effort to instigate action to that end” and that of an actual call to arms or violence “advocacy directed at promoting unlawful action.”

An advocacy of an illegal action at some indefinite time in the future, such as “we’ll take the f**king street later” when an anti-war demonstration group is ordered to disperse, as long as it is not directed at a specific group, but is a generic utterance, was not considered by the Court in Hess v. Indiana 414 U.S. 105 (1973) @ 107 to produce immediate or imminent harm, and therefore is protected speech.

Hess v. Indiana 414 U.S. 105 (1973) @ 107
http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/414/105/case.html
“It hardly needs repeating that
“[t]he constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech forbid the States to punish the use of words or language not within ‘narrowly limited classes of speech.'”
Gooding v. Wilson, supra, at 405 U. S. 521-522.”

The Quran itself and the Imams promote immediate harm of others by means of violence through murders and rapes and robbery as part of their religion, so that when they violate the free speech provisions, they hide under the guise of “freedom of religion” . The Imams and others like the Muslim Brotherhood support the active overthrow of the Government of the United States, but hide from prosecution and the disbanding of their vicious enemy organizations under the guise of their VIOLENT religion being protected under the freedom of religion clause of the First Amendment, even when those NOT protected, i.e. non-citizens of the United States, are acting as if hostile alien invaders who should be rounded up and at very minimum deported and banned from the United States. But instead, Lynch wants to lynch the American Citizen, back those who preach and act upon the physically violent subjugation of others, and expect us to bow to those who think drinking camel urine with milk is the cure all because Mohammed was a schizophrenic demoniac she views as her enlightened one? And remember, when they drank the urine, the more revered to be holy Muslims in following Mohammed’s edict were those who drank both the milk and urine by putting their lips ON the camel. though nowadays, mostly dumb women pour the urine into a cup on Youtube and puke it right back up. But somehow, even puke is supposed to be “Mmmmmn, mmmmmn, good?” That’s Islam for you, where even nasty puke is just Islam’s great flavor going “the other way”.

Use the Supreme Court Cases cited above for a preparation of the defense you need in Court, and let’s all tell Lynch and Obama the same thing: “Go make a camel happy!”

s;vbkr0boc,klos;
s;vbkr0boc,klos;
8 years ago

Oriana would have so loved you.

wilypagan
wilypagan
8 years ago

Spot on.

logdon
logdon
8 years ago

I have a friend who received a police written caution for hate speech here in Britain.

Some Pakistanis had bought the post office in his village and turned it into a coffee shop.

One Saturday morning a small girl stepped out between the parked cars which filled one side of the road. She was injured by a car driving down the other side.

He turned to the chap next to him and said, ‘if those foreigners had not been allowed to alter the building that wouldn’t have happened.’

The guy reported him to the police, he was hauled into the County police station and the caution issued.

That’s how bad it gets.

However it hasn’t stopped him and his animosity towards Muslims has only grown.

What they’re trying to achieve is tantamount to thought control. It is almost beyond belief.

Parks Curtis
Parks Curtis
8 years ago
Reply to  logdon

MUSLIM 1984 … THE CENTRAL ISSUE IS STILL LYING ABOUT ” RADICAL ISLAM ” ONCE YOU ADMIT MUHAMMAD WAS A PEDOPHILE TERRORIST LYER ENCITING HATE SPEACH THE OTHER LIES GAMES AND ENABLING FALL FLAT……..ISLAM IS TOTALITARIAN AND SATANIC EXPOSE IT

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  logdon

The stunned insignificant authorities everywhere, do not grasp the simple concept that silencing a person does not convert them. All it does is harden attitudes, puts them out of sight, then, when something triggers it, the civil disobedience gets serious.

Dennis
Dennis
8 years ago

While I would agree that many of us see our President and his underlings/followers as people who are totally clueless about how to deal with the Islamic scourge, I do not want to see happening here what happened in Germany to the Jews and non-Aryan people in Europe prior to and during WWII, and in other places throughout history. It would be mortifying to me and right thinking American’s to see that happen in this great country. We must remain civil, with vigilance.

C2
C2
8 years ago

Thanks for being Real Ms. Geller.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago

The old saying of there being free speech in islamic countries and America, the difference being that in America the speaker is allowed to remain free. The democrats want to conform with the islamic world where free speech is punished.

IzlamIsTyranny
IzlamIsTyranny
8 years ago
Reply to  Mahou Shoujo

The HRC has done the same thing in the Great White North.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
8 years ago
Reply to  IzlamIsTyranny

Absolutely, the assorted kangaroo courts, laughingly called “human rights commissions” are staffed by people who have little or no background in Canadian lifestyles or customs. They will sentence average Canadians for the crime of hurting the feelings of some minority, or refusing to acknowledge the superiority of a third world culture of Canadian. The settlements are usually cash, a lot of it. But, should a Canadian of western Christian persuasion attempt to file a complaint, it will be placed in the garbage immediately.

MerchantseamenD
Merchantseamen
8 years ago

Come and knock on my door Lyncher!!! Muslims are like flies they eat $hit and bother people. How is that for hate and discontent. Now I will pray to Jesus for forgiveness one more time, thank you very much.

joe1429
joe1429
8 years ago

Yes pamela… very fiesty. Lynch got a big pair, threatening the first amendment,, lol

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!